Patrick R. Michaud writes:
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 07:14:11AM -0700, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 12:49:48AM -0700, Luke Palmer wrote:
> > > It's likely that the p6ge_compile should be in P6GE, and that P6GEMatch
> > > should be P6GE::Match (that is, [ "P6GE", "Match" ]).
> > > 
> > > Anyone disagree?
> > 
> > Looks great to me -- I'll switch things around to (pardon the pun) match.
> > They'll become "P6GE::compile" (compiler sub) and "P6GE::Match", with
> > a note that P6GE::compile is still subject to change.
> 
> Actually, a comment came up this morning that with the additional
> parsers that are being developed for the engine (e.g., p5 regular
> expressions, wildcarding globs, etc.) it might be more appropriate to
> call this the "Parrot Grammar Engine" instead of the "Perl 6 Grammar
> Engine".  (And somehow "PGE" seems a nicer acronym than "P6GE", and
> somewhat easier to type.)

I had been thinking at all along.  Though, perhaps we should keep it
just "PGE", so we can decide to backronymize it to "Perl Grammar
Engine."

Anyway, don't forget Parrot::Test::P6GE.  There's a reference to the
namespace in there...

Luke

Reply via email to