Done. Committed as r10516 & r10517.
-J
--
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 05:31:02PM -1000, Joshua Hoblitt wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 06:14:21PM -0800, jerry gay wrote:
> > specifically, joshua, when do you think you'll have tuits to dive into
> > the jit config system? no pressure--if it waits un
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 06:14:21PM -0800, jerry gay wrote:
> specifically, joshua, when do you think you'll have tuits to dive into
> the jit config system? no pressure--if it waits until next year, so be
> it. i have some testing tasks i can keep busy with in the meantime.
> based on that info, i
On 12/10/05, jerry gay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> pf/ has been moved to src/packfile/, types/ to src/types/, and with a
> little cleanup from leo due to a mistake i made (sorry!), ops/ has now
> been moved to src/ops/.
>
> next on the list is io/.
>
io/ has been moved under src/io/.
classes/ is n
On 12/8/05, jerry gay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/8/05, jerry gay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > the first phase of the directory reorganization is complete. all
> > directory moves which do not involve the src/ directory are done. hope
> > this clears things up a bit. next, i'll be addressi
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 03:28:19PM -0800, jerry gay wrote:
> On 12/8/05, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Dec 8, 2005, at 18:54, jerry gay wrote:
> > > chip proposed changing the src/ dir to vm/. nobody complained,
> >
> > I have said several times that I don't see any reasons to r
On 12/8/05, jerry gay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the first phase of the directory reorganization is complete. all
> directory moves which do not involve the src/ directory are done. hope
> this clears things up a bit. next, i'll be addressing src/ dirs. if
> you'll recall from recent discussion..
On 12/8/05, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 8, 2005, at 18:54, jerry gay wrote:
> > chip proposed changing the src/ dir to vm/. nobody complained,
>
> I have said several times that I don't see any reasons to rename src.
>
okie-dokie, then. that's all the controversy i need for
On Dec 8, 2005, at 18:54, jerry gay wrote:
chip proposed changing the src/ dir to vm/. nobody complained,
I have said several times that I don't see any reasons to rename src.
There is no benefit at all. And src/ is quite common in distributions
for holding, well, the src.
leo
the first phase of the directory reorganization is complete. all
directory moves which do not involve the src/ directory are done. hope
this clears things up a bit. next, i'll be addressing src/ dirs. if
you'll recall from recent discussion...
On 11/29/05, jerry gay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On
On 11/29/05, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 29, 2005, at 1:45, jerry gay wrote:
> > the parrot directory structure is large and a bit disorganized.
> > let me give you some examples:
> > * build_tools/, util/, and tools/*/ each contain utility perl
> > scripts. these should b
On 11/28/05, Matt Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd really like to see imcc/docs/ get moved to docs/imcc/ while we're
> moving things around. I know that some people consider imcc to be
> rather separate from parrot, but as a compiler writer, I see it as a
> core feature. I always seem to
On 11/28/05, Chip Salzenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 04:45:33PM -0800, jerry gay wrote:
> > i propose reorganizing the tree to improve clarity and cohesion.
>
> Reorganization would be good at this point, but should be undertaken
> cautiously so as to minimize unpleasan
On 11/29/05, jerry gay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/29/05, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This doesn't really work for me. imcc/t* used to test some general
> > parsing features, code generation and register allocation. Therefore it
> > should run early in the tests.
> >
> you
On 11/29/05, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> jerry gay wrote:
>
> > +---t
> > | +---compilers
> > | | +---imcc # moved from imcc/t/
> > | | |
>
> This doesn't really work for me. imcc/t* used to test some general
> parsing features, code generation and reg
jerry gay wrote:
+---t
| +---compilers
| | +---imcc # moved from imcc/t/
| | |
This doesn't really work for me. imcc/t* used to test some general
parsing features, code generation and register allocation. Therefore it
should run early in the tests.
What about
On Nov 29, 2005, at 1:45, jerry gay wrote:
the parrot directory structure is large and a bit disorganized.
let me give you some examples:
* build_tools/, util/, and tools/*/ each contain utility perl
scripts. these should be grouped together under tools/, which
already contains subdirectori
jerry gay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the parrot directory structure is large and a bit disorganized.
> let me give you some examples:
Agreed. I find this confusing sometimes, not being intimately familiar
with all of parrot.
> i propose reorganizing the tree to improve clarity and cohesion.
> h
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 05:37:19PM -1000, Joshua Hoblitt wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 04:45:33PM -0800, jerry gay wrote:
> > * the editor/ directory contains files for text editors and has
> > a generated makefile. there is no reason for this to be a make
> > target. a perl script should be
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 04:45:33PM -0800, jerry gay wrote:
> the parrot directory structure is large and a bit disorganized.
> let me give you some examples:
> * build_tools/, util/, and tools/*/ each contain utility perl
> scripts. these should be grouped together under tools/, which
> already
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 04:45:33PM -0800, jerry gay wrote:
> i propose reorganizing the tree to improve clarity and cohesion.
Reorganization would be good at this point, but should be undertaken
cautiously so as to minimize unpleasantness.
* I can't find a rationale for putting both 'imcc' and 'c
On 11/28/05, Luke Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Jerry,
>
> I'm just curious, I don't mean to criticize your ideas. Just, give
> some "why"s for the "should"s.
>
no worries--this isn't criticism, it's feedback.
> On 11/29/05, jerry gay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > the parrot directory s
Hi Jerry,
I'm just curious, I don't mean to criticize your ideas. Just, give
some "why"s for the "should"s.
On 11/29/05, jerry gay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the parrot directory structure is large and a bit disorganized.
> let me give you some examples:
> * build_tools/, util/, and tools/*/ e
22 matches
Mail list logo
