On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 05:37:19PM -1000, Joshua Hoblitt wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 04:45:33PM -0800, jerry gay wrote:
> > * the editor/ directory contains files for text editors and has
> > a generated makefile. there is no reason for this to be a make
> > target. a perl script should be created to replace makefile,
> > and the dir moved with the other tool & utility scripts.
>
> I disagree. A Perl script won't do any better of a job and will be more
> complex then that rather simple makefile.
I mildly agree with Joshua about Makefiles. More to the point, I
don't like changing directory tree and build tech at the same time.
They're separate changes.
> > * imcc test files are not grouped with other tests (this is
> > already on my TODO list and should be done RSN.)
>
> Does it make sense for the tests to even refer to imcc? IMHO Parrot
> ability to digest PIR is whats really being tested. However unlikely,
> it's worth keeping in ind that Parrots internal PIR compiler may be
> replaced someday.
Oh, one other thing for the renaming game:
IMC vs. PIR
Two names enter
One name leaves
/me giggles
--
Chip Salzenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
