Shlomi Fish writes:
> On Wednesday 02 November 2005 08:23, Michael G Schwern wrote:
>
> > Given that the existing interface is pretty simple, I really don't
> > see why one has to completely fork the code base just to put on a
> > new interface. Surely any new code with a fancy new interface can
On Wednesday 02 November 2005 08:23, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 03:16:01PM +0200, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> > > I'd like to see
> > > that sort of thing as patches to Test::Harness rather than in a fork.
> >
> > Well, I started with Test::Harness and gradually revamped it. The pr
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 03:16:01PM +0200, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> > I'd like to see
> > that sort of thing as patches to Test::Harness rather than in a fork.
>
> Well, I started with Test::Harness and gradually revamped it. The problem is
> that some aspects of the T::H interface suck, and I had to
Hi Michael!
Thanks for your commentary.
On Monday 10 October 2005 23:27, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 10:53:34PM +0200, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> > Let me know what you think.
>
> $ perl -Ilib -wle 'use Test::Shlomif::Harness::Obj;
> Test::Shlomif::Harness::Obj->new->runtests(te
Since this is a community, you can also work with
him to make it all work out.
Shlomi and I have already discussed this.
I don't think anyone should have to get
anyone's permission to play with open source code.
That's exactly right, they don't, and I would never presume to tell
them that
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Andy Lester
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 02:52:49PM -0700, chromatic ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > I do NOT want to see that sort of thing as patches to Test::Harness.
> > I have a few ideas myself on how to make T::H a little more clean
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 08:33:48 +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Just as a comment, I used the TAP doco to write a VB console app for
> testing the non-GUI (library) part of a VB application I recently became
> responsible for. The console app writes TAP to STDOUT, and this can be
> picked up by
-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>That said, now that TAP is well documented (yay), there's nothing wrong
>with writing other harnesses.
Just as a comment, I used the TAP doco to write a VB console app for
testing the non-GUI (library) part of a V
Andy Lester wrote in perl.qa :
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 02:52:49PM -0700, chromatic ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> > I do NOT want to see that sort of thing as patches to Test::Harness.
>
>> I have a few ideas myself on how to make T::H a little more clean and
>> useful, but I'd have to do some ref
Andy Lester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The real issue is that, if Shlomi had come to me and discussed the
> issues rather than "I want to fork Test::Harness", we could have worked
> together. Instead, it's "I want color-coding of tests, and T::H doesn't
> do what I want, so I'm gonna go fork it
On Monday 10 October 2005 23:41, Andy Lester wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 02:27:03PM -0700, Michael G Schwern
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > The way you've broken down the nattier bits of Test::Harness, such as
> > _show_results(), into digestable functions has value. I'd like to see
> > that
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 03:38:20PM -0700, chromatic ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I agree that his approach was inappropriate. Still, he has working code
> and that's significant.
>
> http://petdance.com/perl/geek-culture/
I don't think Shlomi's a fuckhead, nor do I have the bozo bit flipped
agai
On Mon, 2005-10-10 at 17:22 -0500, Andy Lester wrote:
> The real issue is that, if Shlomi had come to me and discussed the
> issues rather than "I want to fork Test::Harness", we could have worked
> together. Instead, it's "I want color-coding of tests, and T::H doesn't
> do what I want, so I'm g
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 02:52:49PM -0700, chromatic ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > I do NOT want to see that sort of thing as patches to Test::Harness.
> I have a few ideas myself on how to make T::H a little more clean and
> useful, but I'd have to do some refactorings myself on a private fork to
On Mon, 2005-10-10 at 16:41 -0500, Andy Lester wrote:
> I do NOT want to see that sort of thing as patches to Test::Harness.
>
> I would like anyone who presumes that he's going to change the internals
> of a module I maintain to talk to me about a general overview of the
> changes first, rather
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 02:27:03PM -0700, Michael G Schwern ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> The way you've broken down the nattier bits of Test::Harness, such as
> _show_results(), into digestable functions has value. I'd like to see
> that sort of thing as patches to Test::Harness rather than in a
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 10:53:34PM +0200, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> Let me know what you think.
$ perl -Ilib -wle 'use Test::Shlomif::Harness::Obj;
Test::Shlomif::Harness::Obj->new->runtests(test_files => [EMAIL PROTECTED])'
t/*.t
Can't use an undefined value as an ARRAY reference at
lib/Test/Shlom
17 matches
Mail list logo
