From: "James Keenan via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 10:05:16 -0700
I don't know much about MethodEmitter.pm, so I don't have any
preferences. I think tewk has done most of the recent work in this
area, so he may have a preference.
kid51
Maybe we should als
Bob Rogers wrote:
So far, such values have not been observed, and would probably
indicate that something was broken upstream. Do you have a preference
for letting these fail hard?
I don't know much about MethodEmitter.pm, so I don't have any
preferences. I think tewk has done most of t
On Saturday 11 August 2007 07:57:55 Bob Rogers wrote:
>I find the following patch necessary to build PMCs in r20605. I'm
> using Perl 5.8.1, so it may be that newer Perls autovivify differently.
> This changed since r20358, but I'm not sure it's worth tracking down.
> If I hear no objections,
From: "James Keenan via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 08:55:25 -0700
Your commit statement says:
+ $decs is not always defined, at least in older Perls.
However, your patch required that $decs be not merely defined, but true:
+$decorators = $decs && le
Bob Rogers wrote:
# New Ticket Created by Bob Rogers
# Please include the string: [perl #44567]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=44567 >
I find the following patch necessary to build PMCs in r20605. I'm
