Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 8:14 PM +0100 1/24/03, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Of course, you should know, how to prepare arguments for function
Heh, I'm not worried--it certainly won't be the first assembly language
I've learned. :)
I knew that.
Just a matter of getting the time to do it, whi
At 8:14 PM +0100 1/24/03, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 11:55 AM -0300 1/24/03, Daniel Grunblatt wrote:
CG vs JIT (running with non jitted opcdes) wins CG, always.
Ah, OK. No function preambles/postambles in the CG case. Hrm, time
to go learn PPC assembly, I guess... :)
Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 11:55 AM -0300 1/24/03, Daniel Grunblatt wrote:
CG vs JIT (running with non jitted opcdes) wins CG, always.
Ah, OK. No function preambles/postambles in the CG case. Hrm, time to go
learn PPC assembly, I guess... :)
Ne need to have a deep understanding of $arch's as
At 12:17 PM -0600 1/24/03, Bruce Gray wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jan 2003 12:26:10 -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 11:55 AM -0300 1/24/03, Daniel Grunblatt wrote:
On Friday 24 January 2003 04:43, Dan Sugalski wrote:
I just gave a run of examples/assembly/mops_p.pasm, getting some
performance numbers.
On Fri, 24 Jan 2003 12:26:10 -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>At 11:55 AM -0300 1/24/03, Daniel Grunblatt wrote:
>>On Friday 24 January 2003 04:43, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>>> I just gave a run of examples/assembly/mops_p.pasm, getting some
>>> performance numbers. Here's an interesting timing.
>>>
>>>
At 11:55 AM -0300 1/24/03, Daniel Grunblatt wrote:
On Friday 24 January 2003 04:43, Dan Sugalski wrote:
I just gave a run of examples/assembly/mops_p.pasm, getting some
performance numbers. Here's an interesting timing.
no jit: 24.9 seconds
with jit: 33.6 seconds
This is... odd. An
On Friday 24 January 2003 04:43, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> I just gave a run of examples/assembly/mops_p.pasm, getting some
> performance numbers. Here's an interesting timing.
>
>no jit: 24.9 seconds
>with jit: 33.6 seconds
>
> This is... odd. And on PPC, FWIW, and I'm not sure if it happens
Dan Sugalski wrote:
I just gave a run of examples/assembly/mops_p.pasm, getting some
performance numbers. Here's an interesting timing.
no jit: 24.9 seconds
with jit: 33.6 seconds
This is... odd. And on PPC, FWIW, and I'm not sure if it happens on x86.
Someone care to check it out and p
Dan Sugalski wrote:
I just gave a run of examples/assembly/mops_p.pasm, getting some
performance numbers. Here's an interesting timing.
no jit: 24.9 seconds
with jit: 33.6 seconds
This is... odd. And on PPC, FWIW, and I'm not sure if it happens on x86.
I'm pretty new to this, so I apolo
I just gave a run of examples/assembly/mops_p.pasm, getting some
performance numbers. Here's an interesting timing.
no jit: 24.9 seconds
with jit: 33.6 seconds
This is... odd. And on PPC, FWIW, and I'm not sure if it happens on x86.
Someone care to check it out and poke around a bit?
--
10 matches
Mail list logo
