At 11:55 AM -0300 1/24/03, Daniel Grunblatt wrote:
Ah, OK. No function preambles/postambles in the CG case. Hrm, time to go learn PPC assembly, I guess... :)On Friday 24 January 2003 04:43, Dan Sugalski wrote:I just gave a run of examples/assembly/mops_p.pasm, getting some performance numbers. Here's an interesting timing.no jit: 24.9 seconds with jit: 33.6 seconds This is... odd. And on PPC, FWIW, and I'm not sure if it happens on x86. Someone care to check it out and poke around a bit?CG vs JIT (running with non jitted opcdes) wins CG, always.
--
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk