On Fri, 24 Jan 2003 12:26:10 -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote: >At 11:55 AM -0300 1/24/03, Daniel Grunblatt wrote: >>On Friday 24 January 2003 04:43, Dan Sugalski wrote: >>> I just gave a run of examples/assembly/mops_p.pasm, getting some >>> performance numbers. Here's an interesting timing. >>> >>> no jit: 24.9 seconds >>> with jit: 33.6 seconds >>> >>> This is... odd. And on PPC, FWIW, and I'm not sure if it happens on x86. >>> >>> Someone care to check it out and poke around a bit? >> >>CG vs JIT (running with non jitted opcdes) wins CG, always. > >Ah, OK. No function preambles/postambles in the CG case. Hrm, time to >go learn PPC assembly, I guess... :)
IBM hosts a tutorial on Linux PowerPC assembly, with links to instruction set, ABI, and optimization: http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-ppc/ You were probably joking, but my knee jerked :) -- Hope this helps, Bruce Gray
