en
out.
>
> If you write such a tool, I'd like to try it.
Perhaps. Time and ambition will tell.
>
> Daniel.
>
Cheers,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. Limbic~Region
d)
I really don't want to have to set up two benchmarks for each program
and then capture the output and then merge the results. I know I
could write some code to do that but if someone already has such a
tool I would just as soon use that.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel.
>
Cheers,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. Limbic~Region
# New Ticket Created by "Joshua Gatcomb"
# Please include the string: [perl #52150]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=52150 >
After learning that some folks were having troubles building parrot
fic purposes of this thread, going
the TPF route may not be the most efficient way to accomplish that goal.
Cheers,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. Limbic~Region
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 4:23 PM, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 21 February 2008 06:25:42 Joshua Gatcomb wrote:
>
>
> I could take a month's sabbatical from my day job for $5000 without losing
> insurance coverage or other benefits. That's sli
elp. I
don't get the tax write off but I know where my money is going.
In closing, what we don't need is something to fight over. Hopefully you
will find the sweet spot - I sure hope you do.
Cheers,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. Limbic~Region
On Nov 18, 2007 12:25 PM, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The next release will be on Tuesday evening. Committers, please review your
> checkins and update NEWS appropriately. Everyone, please submit updates to
> PLATFORMS.
>
> Running make fulltest and reporting any failures would be very
> Per your request, the pasted output of mingw32-make fulltest with gcc
> 3.4.5 on Win32
>
> rev 22919
Ok, I am a dolt - that is the output for Win32 Cygwin
The output for Win32 MinGW is coming soon
>
> /usr/bin/perl.exe t/harness --gc-debug --running-make-test -b
> t/compilers/imcc/*/*.t t/op/
On Nov 18, 2007 12:25 PM, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The next release will be on Tuesday evening. Committers, please review your
> checkins and update NEWS appropriately. Everyone, please submit updates to
> PLATFORMS.
>
> Running make fulltest and reporting any failures would be very
# New Ticket Created by "Joshua Gatcomb"
# Please include the string: [perl #44775]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=44775 >
As far as I can tell, r20659 is the last rev perl6 worked correctly on
FYI all
r20662 builds fine on Win32 with MinGW and Cygwin
Cheers,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. Limbic~Region
# New Ticket Created by "Joshua Gatcomb"
# Please include the string: [perl #43515]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=43515 >
see http://nopaste.snit.ch:8001/10585 for details or paste bel
.5 or compiling a more recent gcc themselves.
That is, as long as it is not causing problems anywhere else.
Cheers,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. Limbic~Region
On 6/12/07, Andy Lester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm very uncomfortable with removing #pragma once from our header
files. It is per
. Just /bin is probably a bit paranoid but that doesn't mean that the
gremlins aren't out to get me.
Cheers,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. Limbic~Region
author that there was a bug which counted lines
after __DATA__ as perl code. I am not sure if that applies in this
situation but it added 10K SLOC to my project which was less than 2K without
it ;-)
Cheers,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. Limbic~Region
On 3/28/07, Ron Blaschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Joshua Gatcomb wrote:
> Really? No one on #parrot has been able to get parrot to work on Cygwin
> for months.
Interesting, didn't know about this.
The issue for the longest time was that miniparrot.exe would silently die
ersion of cygwin1.dll)
Cheers,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. Limbic~Region
Here's the output of "make test" on my box.
Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed
---
t/codingstd/
ake it worth reading. While it has lost a bit of momentum - it is
still
being updated with new posts almost daily.
Allison
Cheers,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. Limbic~Region
uated as it is
parsed while some require additional homegrown code to parse the resulting
parse tree (data structure).
I have not had a chance to look at Flavio's links yet. Since no one who
actually knows rules seemed to be inspired to write an example for me - I
will *eventually* figure it out on my own and post back to the list as an
FYI.
Paul Seamons
Cheers,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. Limbic~Region
run in Perl 5 today
without needing Pugs or Parrot.
Cheers,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. Limbic~Region
ake over nmake. Perhaps
that's wrong.
I don't think it is wrong but perhaps the order of hints/make should
change. I don't know that's why I am asking.
--
Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cheers,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. Limbic~Region
h has
changed from nmake to mingw32-make along the way, which is bound to fail.
Perhaps this is the spot where it is appropriate to warn the user.
I don't mind writing the patch but as I have been away for 1.5 years I would
really like to hear the opinions of where is the best way to do it.
Chee
Anyone know what my problems is or is willing to work with me on this would
be most appreciated.
Cheers,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. Limbic~Region
On 4/4/06, Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 09:16:23AM -0400, Joshua Gatcomb wrote:
>
Junctions are not intended for that use. We have Sets for that now.
Ok. So this will work out of the box if you use the right tool. Cool.
The cabal alrea
, etc
without creating your own infix operator?
Cheers,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. Limbic~Region
repository
to the public http://use.perl.org/~nicholas/journal/24649 but is anyone else
working on the project? With the excitement of Perl6, Parrot, and Pugs I
wonder if Ponie is being neglected.
Inquiring minds want to know.
Cheers,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. Limbic~Region
l experience they are
prevalent.
--
> H.Merijn Brand Amsterdam Perl Mongers (http://amsterdam.pm.org/)
>
Cheers,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. Limbic~Region
On 10/24/05, Joshua Gatcomb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 10/24/05, Juerd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > >Feel free to add your own, or fears you heard about!
>
>
This really isn't a fear as much as it is a complaint. It has to do with
of date.
We don't have a single source where people can go for relatively "up to the
minute" facts concerning the project.
Juerd
Cheers,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. Limbic~Region
al parameter that would specify behavior
-min (zip to the smallest list)
-undef (insert undefs as needed)
-error (blow up if the lists are not equal in size)
etc
Juerd
>
Just my 2 cents from the peanut gallery.
Cheers,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. L~R
alidate what I was
seeing. Parrot has changed considerably since then as
has Cygwin and gcc. I would suggest asking the list
if there is anyone interested in carrying on the
Cygwin torch by asking them to reproduce the problem.
I no longer have an environment to do so.
> Thanks,
>
this in long tight running loops and found that the ways to achieve
it (as shown above) are worse then leaving the op in.
Michele
>
Cheers,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. Limbic~Region
On 6/17/05, Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 03:56:50AM +0800, Autrijus Tang wrote:
> :
> : my $x = 3;
> : my $y = \$x;
> : say $y + 10;
> : $y++;
> : say $y;
> : say $x;
> :
> I suspect people will find that counterintuitive. A more consiste
which is determined by previous read
In p5, you need to keep track of your offset and skip that number of
bytes each time. It would be nice if p6 could somehow make that
easier. Again, my focus is on the design docs and not on pack/unpack.
I just used it as a discussion point since it is what I was working
on at the time.
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. L~R
lue i.e. $string.packed, comment about the
'packed' warnings/strictures pragma, and stick it the "right" place.
The patch to S09 has me stumped.
Is there any other reference material I can use to put together solid
frameworks that are closely representative to what @larry might
produce?
> Pm
>
Cheers,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. L~R
On 6/10/05, Joshua Gatcomb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmmm. Thanks. I guess I will have to go back over the questions I
> have asked and see if any decisions were rendered not relfected in
> docs and be a pioneer.
Ok, are there any guidelines for what should and should not be
that
patches had been requested with a volunteer to act as the approving
authority.
Hmmm. Thanks. I guess I will have to go back over the questions I
have asked and see if any decisions were rendered not relfected in
docs and be a pioneer.
>
> Pm
>
Cheers,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. L~R
ite access to be limited to @larry
initially. The community posts patches where the bulk of the work is
done and @larry makes any necessary modifications and commits. If
even that work load proves to be too much, perhaps common mortals get
granted commit access on a case-by-case basis.
Cheers,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. Gat
(240) 568-5675
t know anything about unicode and leaving
the hard choices for doing the "right thing" up to you all. Whatever
the "right thing" is, will there be a way to do what my code snippet
showed?
Cheers,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. L~R
utoconvert but forget it ever
happened, and 1 would be an outright failure.
Ok - so could someone set me straight?
What should that code snippet do? Would it do anything different if
Int had been int?
Cheers,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. L~R
dea of having mutator and non-mutator versions of chomp (and
other functions) have been kicked around the list.
Any definitive word yet?
Cheers,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. L~R
value can
change.
sub some_rourtine {
state $foo = 42;
return $foo++;
}
My apologies if this has been previously discussed or is documented
somewhere. I am still playing catch up. Ok, ok - it's true - I am
looking for a little instant gratification.
Cheers,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. L~R
On 5/4/05, Luke Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/4/05, Joshua Gatcomb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ok - this isn't what I was expecting at all. That doesn't make it a
> > bad thing. Given something that looks a lot more like a typical
> >
On 5/4/05, Luke Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/4/05, Joshua Gatcomb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So without asking for S17 in its entirety to be written, is it
> > possible to get a synopsis of how p6 will do coroutines? I ask
> > because after re
a coroutine", it is
clear there is more than one way to dictate behavior.
http://www.sidhe.org/~dan/blog/archives/000178.html
Cheers,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. L~R
from
where I am sitting - you all are the ones that have done the hard
work. Having answered the questions enough times in p5 circles
though, it would be nice to have a real simple easy answer for p6.
Cheers,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. L~R
to find out what, if anything, is the proper way
to do what I want. The worst that could happen is that I find out
there isn't a way to get a what matched from an any() eq any()
comparison.
Cheers,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. L~R
> @array { ... }
is what I think it might be modeling it after the for
loop, but the closest thing I see for while is:
while =$*IN -> $line {...}
I am happy to write tests to get the appropriate
functionality in Pugs, but I am not sure what is
appropriate???
Cheers,
Joshua Gatc
> @array { ... }
is what I think it might be modeling it after the for
loop, but the closest thing I see in while is:
while =$*IN -> $line {...}
I am happy to write tests to get the appropriate
functionality in Pugs, but I am not sure what is
appropriate???
Cheers,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. L~R
he test
suite my prompt some one with tuits to fix this. It
may be that the fix itself is a design decision and
there is as of yet no ruling.
>
> Joshua Gatcomb should comment on whether or not this
> should be applied.
Apply away. I have held off making any modifications
waiting on anothe
All,
Please read Clinton's reply - especially the part
about being blocked from the list for about a year.
Cheers,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. Limbic~Region
--- "Clinton A. Pierce" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 11:34:05 -0500
> To: Joshua Gatcomb
continuing maintenance?
And just to be clear for those reading at homejust
because I am asking doesn't mean I am volunteering.
Cheers
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. Limbic~Region
__
Do you Yahoo!?
The all-new My Yahoo! - Get yours free!
ave 2 questions:
1. Would people prefer missing data for benchmarks
where they won't work or a manually entered high
number to draw attention to them?
2. Should we be checking that the output of the
benchmarks (right or wrong) is consistent?
Cheers
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. Lim
e may cross post
to other Perl forums such as PerlMonks
(http://www.perlmonks.org). This is a perfect way for
non C programmers and those who have no knowledge of
Parrot to still contribute in a meaningful way.
Cheers
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. Limbic~R
> At 11:08 PM -0800 11/2/04, Jeff Clites wrote:
> >On Nov 2, 2004, at 7:10 PM, Matt Diephouse wrote:
> >
> >>Joshua Gatcomb and I have been working a little
> under a week to set up
> >>an automated build system for parrot that tracks
> performance (with
>
oon with it :)
pass the --cgoto=0 flag to Configure.pl. I also have
RH 9.0 and would love someone to confirm that make
testj will fail on 3 tests (unless you additionally
pass it another flag). Interestingly enough - the
same failure ocurrs on Cygwin.
> Kind regards,
> Alberto
Cheer
ks to me like a LD_LIBRARY_PATH issue. One
> simple fix
> is to set the environment variable
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib
> export LD_LIBRARY_PATH
> (in Bourne shell syntax).
>
> Does that help?
This indeed corrects this problem.
>
--- Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joshua Gatcomb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> All tests pass normally, but I get 3 tests
> failing
> >> under JIT
> >>
> >> t/op/interp.t #7
> >> t/pmc/coroutine.t #10
> >>
--- Joshua Gatcomb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> ok, so I did investigate a little further. make
> testj
> works fine (all tests pass) if I don't pass the
> --optimize flag to Configure.pl.
Ok, so optimizations break things - why not add more.
Interestingly, adding
--- Joshua Gatcomb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- Joshua Gatcomb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > 1. Transfer ICU 3.0 and build from source
> > 2. Do a fresh CVS checkout of parrot, transfer
> and
> > build
> >
--- Joshua Gatcomb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> 1. Transfer ICU 3.0 and build from source
> 2. Do a fresh CVS checkout of parrot, transfer and
> build
>
> $ perl Configure.pl --optimize
>
>
> $ make
>
>
> c++ -o parrot -L/usr/local/lib -Wl
/parrot/include/parrotlib.pbc] Error
127
ICU libs are in /usr/local/lib
/usr/local/lib is in my path
all libs are executable
libicuuc.so.30 indeed does exist in that directory
Any advice?
Cheers
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. Limbic~Region
__
Do yo
--- Matt Fowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joshua Gatcomb accidentally introduced a dependency
> on
> Config::IniFiles. Since it is implemented in pure
> perl he offered to
> add it to the repository. Warnock applies.
>
> http://xrl.us/div3
In the note offeri
was to just continue telling it about
my system ICU and not let it try to figure it out.
perl Configure.pl --icuheaders=/usr/local/include
--icushared='-L/usr/local/lib -lcygicuuc -lcygicudt'
>
> jens
>
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. Limbic~Region
___
--- Joshua Gatcomb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Threads: Y*
> Tests:Y***
>
> * You need to enable the threading tests by adding
> cygwin to t/pmc/threads.t though a handful of tests
> will fail due to an outstanding IO issue likely
> caused
> by Cygwin
>
&g
--- Joshua Gatcomb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I happened to have found the last cygwin1.dll lying
> around in /tmp that I kept as a backup. I swapped
> it
> with the current cygwin1.dll just to see if it would
> make the IO problem go away and much to my happy
> surpris
cygwin1.dll-1.5.11-1 - current stable build, blows up
I will be pinging the Cygwin list momentarily to see
if they have any insight.
Cheers
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. Limbic~Region
___
Do you Yahoo!?
Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
http
gwin
** You need to enable the signal tests by adding
cygwin to t/pmc/signals.t
*** The only failing tests are if you enable the
threading tests as annotated above
> leo
I used to have Win ME to test but no longer so I don't
know what 9x/ME would turn up
Joshua Gatcomb
While it has introduced a new IO bug that is failing a
handful of threads tests, it also appears to have
fixed a different bug where some of the trigonomic
functions would blow up under JIT.
Cheers,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. Limbic~Region
___
Do you
ping the Cygwin
list if anyone thinks it might help.
Cheers,
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. Limbic~Region
___
Do you Yahoo!?
Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
http://vote.yahoo.com
on a regular basis.
>
> leo
>
>
Cheers
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. Limbic~Region
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
rather confused as to why it is passing
without the patch since it only ever prints "thread"
> jens
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. Limbic~Region
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
--- Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joshua Gatcomb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > After the change - case 3 now prints thread 1.
>
> Strange.
indeed
> > You mentioned in the previous email that you were
> > interested in knowing
rite my own
parsing code if that would be more desired. We could
revert back to the previous version which did not have
the requirement.
Just let me know
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. Limbic~Region
___
Do you Yahoo!?
Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
http://vote.yahoo.com
--- Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joshua Gatcomb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ... only 1 of the
> > two messages is displayed
>
> I've fixed a flaw in the IO flush code. Please try
> again, thanks.
Still not working, but thanks! The be
XPECTEDLY
SUCCEEDED).
Files=1, Tests=21, 7 wallclock secs ( 4.03 cusr +
2.02 csys = 6.05 CPU)
> jens
Glad to see I am not the only Cygwin user out there
;-)
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. Limbic~Region
__
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo!
--- Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Joshua Gatcomb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>> I had submitted a patch some time ago that never
got
>> applied enabling tests for threads, timer, and
>> extend_13.
> Overlooked? Please rediff and resend
--- Joshua Gatcomb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Up until a couple of weeks ago, all the threads
> tests
> were passing on Cygwin. I had submitted a patch
> some
> time ago that never got applied enabling tests for
> threads, timer, and extend_13 that never got
> appl
read 1
It is almost as if by the time the time the second
print happens, the filehandle is already closed
So - since threads aren't officially supposed to be
working on Cygwin - is this something I should care
about or not?
Cheers
Joshua Gat
--- Jens Rieks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 29 September 2004 18:40, Joshua Gatcomb
> wrote:
> > cannot find -licui18n
> I am not sure, is this library used by parrot?
I have no idea - first I have seen it other than when
I built ICU many moons ago.
>
>
re.
That's what I am doing for now
>
> jens
>
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. Limbic~Region
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
Divorce internals from interface.
2. Add what's missing.
3. Fix what's broke.
4. Delay optimizing working code in favor of 2 & 3.
Since the usual purpose of a point release is to have
features finished and bugs squashed, it may be a good
time for another release.
What say you?
Cheer
is b0rk. I would think
portability is a good thing but don't go changing
things on my account yet. When I get the time, I will
investigate.
Cheers
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. Limbic~Region
__
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
result
is different:
loaded runtime/parrot/dynext/libnci.so
vs
loaded libnci.so
Before I started digging around I was wondering if
someone might want to whack me with the clue stick.
Cheers
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. Limbic~Region
__
Do you Yaho
--- Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think I could track it down. It wasn't strictly
> NCI related, though.
I guess you didn't need me to track down the CVS
changes as this fixed the problem - THANKS.
Cheers
Joshua Gatcom
pe = const_string(interpreter,
< PMC_struct_val(lib_pmc) ? "Ops" :
"PMC");
< }
< /*
< * call init, if it exists
< */
---
> /* get init_func */
298,299c314,316
< if (init_func)
< (init_func)(interpreter, lib_pmc);
---
&g
--- Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joshua Gatcomb wrote:
> > This might help shed some light:
> >
> > $ cd t/pmc
> > $ parrot nci_1.pasm
>
> Not really. bash: parrot: command not found ;)
> You got an old parrot around somewhere in the
--- Joshua Gatcomb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Enhancements:
> 1. Should be platform independent now
> 2. Much greater control using ini configuration
> 3. Output is "pretty"
> 4. Lots of bugs squashed (probably more introduced)
I found a few and have erradicat
--- Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joshua Gatcomb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > t/pmc/nci.t28 716835 28 80.00%
> 1-27
>
> strange.
>
> > t/pmc/perlhash.t1 256361 2.78% 20
>
> Only that one is
2.78% 20
2 tests and 53 subtests skipped.
Failed 2/120 test scripts, 98.33% okay. 29/1828
subtests failed, 98.41% okay.
make: *** [test] Error 14
Not that you need to ask, but Cygwin ;-)
Cheers
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. Limbic~Region
___
Do you Yahoo!?
> Additionaly, maybe later it would be better to just
> drop the sqlite database and ue rrd directly?
I still have a few ideas for improving parrotbench.pl.
When I am done with those, I will confer with you on
getting the storage format worked out.
> Regards,
> Jerome
> --
> [EMA
Much greater control using ini configuration
3. Output is "pretty"
4. Lots of bugs squashed (probably more introduced)
5. POD updated
6. Multiple regexes allowed for benchmarks to be run
7. Multiple regexes allowed for benchmarks to be
skipped
8. Probably some stuff I am forgetting
--- Joshua Gatcomb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Here is the modified parrotbench script along with
> the
> new data collection script and the script to make it
> into a web page.
>
> I don't know what kind of layout/data would be
> useful
> to people so let
data collection script and the script to make it
into a web page.
I don't know what kind of layout/data would be useful
to people so let me know if you want something else.
I will update every Tuesday morning.
Cheers
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. Limbic~Region
___
if I can't
get back to what I was seeing before.
Either way - I think it is a good thing to keep track
of our performance impact when making changes -
perhaps I will get more motivated and make the code a
bit more robust and use parrotbench instead of my
homegrown stuff.
Cheers
Joshua Ga
chmark
It is also a very quick hack because I was on my lunch
break.
Enjoy
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. Limbic~Region
___
Do you Yahoo!?
Win 1 of 4,000 free domain names from Yahoo! Enter now.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/goldrush
benchmark
Description: benchmark
table version of ICU source, build it, and note
anything "special" they needed to do to get it
working. Those things should make putting a newer
version into CVS a realistic possibility. I am
volunteering for Cygwin (yeah I know - big surprise
there).
Cheers
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a
Ok - so which way do we go?
A. Leave it as is
B. Upgrade to a bare bones 3.0
C. Upgrade to a full version of 3.0
D. Improve the config/gen/icu.pl with any of the
previous options
E. Something else entirely?
Joshua Gatcomb
a.k.a. Gat
(240) 568-5675
_
--- Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joshua Gatcomb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > All:
> > The ICU that is bundled with Parrot is old.
>
> > George Rhoten, an ICU developer, has suggested we
> > start shipping version 3.0 because:
>
to a system ICU we do that.
C. Have someone volunteer to strip stuff out of the
3.0 version and start bundling that.
There are likely other options but as George pointed
out - we appear to be spending an awful lot of effort
making the old ICU work when upgrading would solve all
our problems (my
1 - 100 of 143 matches
Mail list logo
