Re: W3C validator

Op een mooie lentedag (Monday 08 May 2006 20:01),schreef Gabor Szabo: > I checked it again, one can download the source code of their service > from here http://validator.w3.org/source/ > and it is even packaged in some of the linux distros. > > (It is of course slightly outdated on Debian) > > So

Re: Smoke [5.9.4] 27938 FAIL(X) linux 2.6.15-20-386 [debian] (i686/1 cpu)

Op een mooie winterdag (Monday 24 April 2006 00:21),schreef Abe Timmerman: > Op een mooie winterdag (Sunday 23 April 2006 17:30),schreef Steve Peters: I am so sorry, I got you mixed up with the other Steve (Hay that

Re: Smoke [5.9.4] 27938 FAIL(X) linux 2.6.15-20-386 [debian] (i686/1 cpu)

Op een mooie winterdag (Sunday 23 April 2006 17:30),schreef Steve Peters: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Automated smoke report for 5.9.4 patch 27938 > > kirk: Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 2.00GHz (GenuineIntel 1994MHz) (i686/1 cpu) > > onlinux - 2.6.15-20-386 [debian] > > using cc

Re: Test::Smoke reports archive ?

Op een zonnige zomerdag (Monday 02 August 2004 01:25), schreef Jim Cromie: > for various reasons, it would be nice to have a newsgroup, > ex this one (perl.test, but sending failed), or perhaps > [EMAIL PROTECTED], that gets full-reports for smoke-tests when > something breaks. http://www

Re: PERL_UNICODE and smokes

Op een druilerige winterdag (Wednesday 10 March 2004 12:00), schreef Rafael Garcia-Suarez: > Abe Timmerman wrote in perl.daily-build : > >> The recent smoke failures noticed by Merijn are reproducible with > >> the environment variables > >> PERL_UNICODE=&qu

Re: Testing complex web site

Op een druilerige winterdag (Monday 19 January 2004 19:10), schreef Gabor Szabo: > If this is OT, please point me to some better place to find an answer. > > I am looking for a way to functional and load test a web site. > > On the functional level: > Basic things can be achieved by WWW::Mechaniz

Re: testing File::Finder

Op een winterige herfstdag (Thursday 18 December 2003 22:44), schreef Randal L. Schwartz: > > "Michael" == Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Michael> If you're not planning on your tests modifying the test tree at > all, Michael> you can probably just get away with having t/tr

Re: Scrutinizing CPAN distributions (was Testing for valid path names...)

Op een zonnige zomerdag (Monday 18 August 2003 21:48), schreef Thomas Klausner: > Hi! > > Just yesterday I was thinking of something like validator.cpan.org > (parallel to validator.w3.org): > > Upload a dist and let it be checked by a future version of Module::CPANTS. > > You should get back a r

Re: Testers & PASS

Op een zonnige zomerdag (Sunday 03 August 2003 10:42), schreef Leon Brocard: > Leon Brocard sent the following bits through the ether: > > Secondly, who do I need to convince to add the "make test" results for > > PASSes too? ;-) > > So, does anyone actually have an opinion on this? If you are ta

Re: Test-Smoke questions

Op een zonnige zomerdag (Friday 27 June 2003 20:26), schreef John Peacock: > Abe Timmerman wrote: > > T::S::S::Hardlink uses *all* of the source directory, so if you are using > > a working copy (under version control) the MANIFEST check will report all > > .svn stuff in the

Re: Test-Smoke questions

Op een zonnige zomerdag (Friday 27 June 2003 17:19), schreef John Peacock: > Now that I have a subversion repository of the APC (All Perl Changes) on a > machine that is largely unloaded, I can set up a smoke process nightly. In > order to do that, I have a couple of questions: > > 1) When runnin