Op een zonnige zomerdag (Monday 18 August 2003 21:48), schreef Thomas Klausner:
> Hi! > > Just yesterday I was thinking of something like validator.cpan.org > (parallel to validator.w3.org): > > Upload a dist and let it be checked by a future version of Module::CPANTS. > > You should get back a report and/or a "kwalitee" rating. If the kwalitee is > too low, improve your distribution (where improve means: code the module so > that it gets a high kwalitee). The hard part of this validation service is > definitly deciding how to calculate kwalitee. Perhaps the way Web Content Accessebility Guidelines is setup, is a better way to get this off to a start. I like the way Bobby (http://bobby.cast.org) checks and reports your (non)use of the guidelines. IMO it is better to have guidelines than laws carved in stone. There are already a lot of good guidelines discussed in the thread and most of them can be checked for or an indication can be given to module authors as to how to follow the guideline. Good luck, Abe -- Rafael> Actually you're thinking aloud, here ? Yes? No? Maybe? -- Jarkko Hietaniemi on p5p @ 2003-02-17
