Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
I'm not at all arguing that this automatically means we should call
them "methods", but at a conceptual level they certainly seem a lot
like methods, and the vtable implementations contain references to
things like SELF and STATICSELF that make them look awfully method-
jerry gay wrote:
i believe (without looking) that the pmc pdd calls them "vtable functions".
i really wish the "vtable methods" meme would die. they're not
methods. they are a collection functions which define the api to
access the pmc, parrot's abstract data type.
Yup. "vtable functions" is
That fixes it, thanks!
Closing ticket,
Pm
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 9:11 AM, Patrick R. Michaud (via RT)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by Patrick R. Michaud
> # Please include the string: [perl #59374]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?i
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 07:25:35AM -0700, Chris Davaz wrote:
> Fixed a bug in the doc where the method name and doc where mismatched.
Thanks.
> Fixed a small bug where, even if the user sets the prompt, a default
> prompt '> ' is still printed. Changed it so that a default prompt is
> only printe
# New Ticket Created by Patrick R. Michaud
# Please include the string: [perl #59374]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=59374 >
Summary: pmc2c produces incorrect code for returning negative
integer constants,
# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak"
# Please include the string: [perl #59360]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=59360 >
Rakudo r31409 assumes that all flags that it hasn't heard about are
program files.
$ ./
# New Ticket Created by "Chris Davaz"
# Please include the string: [perl #59366]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=59366 >
Fixed a bug in the doc where the method name and doc where mismatched.
Fixed a small b
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 11:31 PM, Patrick R. Michaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 10:05:25PM +0200, Stéphane Payrard wrote:
>> One of parrot current limitation is that eval is always a closure.
>> When using rakudo interactively, one want to introduce new
>> lexical variable
Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> Lines 46-52 of t/spec/S02-literals/pairs.t claims that
> the colonpair notation should produce a Bool instead of
> an Int:
>
> #?rakudo todo 'Adverbial pairs without should produce a Bool (not Int)'
> is f2(:a), "Bool", "':a' is a named";
> #?rakudo
10 matches
Mail list logo
