Patrick R. Michaud wrote: > Lines 46-52 of t/spec/S02-literals/pairs.t claims that > the colonpair notation should produce a Bool instead of > an Int: > > #?rakudo todo 'Adverbial pairs without should produce a Bool (not Int)' > is f2(:a), "Bool", "':a' is a named"; > #?rakudo todo '.() sub calls' > is(f2.(:a), "Bool", "in 'f2.(:a)', ':a' is a named"); > #?rakudo todo 'Adverbial pairs without should produce a Bool (not Int)' > is $f2(:a), "Bool", "in '\$f2(:a)', ':a' is a named"; > > However, S02 says that C<:a> corresponds to C<< a => 1 >> in > fatarrow notation, which seems to argue that C<:a> should in > fact have an Int value. > > Are the tests correct here, or am I reading too much into > the synopsis description?
Most likely the tests are wrong. Moritz -- Moritz Lenz http://moritz.faui2k3.org/ | http://perl-6.de/
