Hi there,
I have 36 Sun-AMD based systems and customer is running Solaris-10 on it. Would
like to do benchmarking of the same, but finding some difficulty in compiling
the Atlas and HPL both. I have searched a lot but i have not found any document
on compiling HPL on Solaris. Is it different th
Jim Fiori wrote:
Lock contention Matt. See what locks are hot:
# lockstat -o lockstat.out -D20 sleep 10
Matt V. wrote:
OK, I tried the DTrace script "hotkernel" et the result is:
[...]
ce`ce_intr 1245 0.4%
unix`page_lookup_nowait
David Lutz wrote:
lwp_park() was called with a timeout period. An exit
with ETIME just means that the timeout expired. It isn't
necessarily an error.
Yeah, it seems these are just expiring connections.
Looking at the problem from a different view, it looks almost like the
e1000g bug 671
Mika Borner wrote:
>
> Mika Borner wrote:
> >Darren Reed wrote:
> >>
> >>Is any of this driven out of inetd?
> >>
> >>
> >No, its a separate process, that spawns LWPs
> >
>
> I have now trussed the irresponsive process and can see:
>
> /3:lwp_park(0xFEFD7DA8, 0)Err#62 ETIME
>
> Is this assumption correct, and how can we make the
> machine run with the increased clock speed based on
> the frequency multiplier?
O.k., replying to myself: for Linux, we verified with a small custom benchmark
that in spite of the kernel status output, the machine *does* run at the
increase
Mika Borner wrote:
Darren Reed wrote:
Is any of this driven out of inetd?
No, its a separate process, that spawns LWPs
I have now trussed the irresponsive process and can see:
/3:lwp_park(0xFEFD7DA8, 0)Err#62 ETIME
A couple of minutes later all network interfaces sta
Greetings,
we are running an overclocked Intel Core i7-3.3GHz box (for a specific
purpose). The BIOS shows the increased CPU frequency correctly, but after
booting OpenSolaris 06/09, psrinfo reports the original 3,3GHz. The same thing
happens with Linux, but not with Windows where the machine
Lock contention Matt. See what locks are hot:
# lockstat -o lockstat.out -D20 sleep 10
Matt V. wrote:
OK, I tried the DTrace script "hotkernel" et the result is:
[...]
ce`ce_intr 1245 0.4%
unix`page_lookup_nowait 1
OK, I tried the DTrace script "hotkernel" et the result is:
[...]
ce`ce_intr 1245 0.4%
unix`page_lookup_nowait 1330 0.5%
genunix`rm_assize1448 0.5%
genunix`segmap_getmapflt
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 7:23 AM, Chad Mynhier wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 6:47 AM, Matt V. wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On a Solaris 10 server, with 'top' command, we have:
>> CPU states: 28.9% idle, 14.2% user, 56.9% kernel, 0.0% iowait, 0.0% swap
>>
>> How to know where is spent kernel usage plea
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 6:47 AM, Matt V. wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On a Solaris 10 server, with 'top' command, we have:
> CPU states: 28.9% idle, 14.2% user, 56.9% kernel, 0.0% iowait, 0.0% swap
>
> How to know where is spent kernel usage please ?
>
> Thank you in advance.
> Matt
There are a number of t
Matt V. stated:
< Hi,
<
< On a Solaris 10 server, with 'top' command, we have:
< CPU states: 28.9% idle, 14.2% user, 56.9% kernel, 0.0% iowait, 0.0% swap
<
< How to know where is spent kernel usage please ?
lockstat can lock, so too can the hotkernel script from the DTrace Toolkit.
If you
Hi,
On a Solaris 10 server, with 'top' command, we have:
CPU states: 28.9% idle, 14.2% user, 56.9% kernel, 0.0% iowait, 0.0% swap
How to know where is spent kernel usage please ?
Thank you in advance.
Matt
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
13 matches
Mail list logo
