On Thu, 12 Jun 2003 18:34:54 +1000
"Anthony Farr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When I travelled by Eurostar in 1999 there were scanner points to
> pass through at Gare du Nord. Departing from Waterloo might be a
> different story.
Yeah, but my assumption/hope is just that they are slightly more
The exposure comp. detents may be 'only' at full stops, but they're not very
strongly detented, or sprung towards the detents. It's very easy to set
them at any intermediate point to get fractional stops of compensation.
regards,
Anthony Farr
- Original Message -
From: "Lon Williamson"
I agree with the comment on that page. You get much more noice, no resolution
improvement unless you use some expencive lenses, but maybe some improvement in Moire
and Bayer artifacts.
However, it will look good in the adverticements and brochures...
DagT
> Fra: Caveman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
I agree with the comment on that page. You get much more noise, no resolution
improvement unless you use some expencive lenses, but maybe some improvement in Moire
and Bayer artifacts.
However, it will look good in the adverticements and brochures...
DagT
> Fra: Caveman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
The French security personnel were very friendly, chatty and helpfull. This
was at the height of the Soho nail-bombings in '99 and on board security was
high. There were also frequent announcements that unattended luggage would
be exploded, so a sterner mood might have been expected.
We found Fr
I've had both of my SuperPrograms tested by the local
crusty old repair guy. Synch on both is very close to
1/90th. I posted to PDML about this once upon a time
and got a fair amount of confirmation from other folks
around here.
-Lon
Alan Chan wrote:
Pentax lied about synch speed. It's 1/90th.
That's really deep
Shaun Canning
Cultural Heritage Services
High Street, Broadford,
Vic, 3658
Mob: 0414-967 644
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.heritageservices.com.au
-Original Message-
From: Caveman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 12 June 2003 12:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTE
I've posted about this separately, but it bears re-asking. Do you refer to
the speed of the X-position of the mode dial, or the speed when the
shutter-speed selector is on 1/125sec? I would frequently use that setting
if I wanted to mix TTL ambient and OTF-flash metering (the X-position is
unmete
I don't think this is the case, Anthony. The
shutter speed curve has a wiggle right at 125th
that happens on flash synch or on manual. To me,
this is no big deal. However, someone questing
for a perfect "within a third stop" exposure would
probably have to factor it in.
Anthony Farr wrote:
I rea
Agreed.
Anthony Farr wrote:
The exposure comp. detents may be 'only' at full stops, but they're not very
strongly detented, or sprung towards the detents. It's very easy to set
them at any intermediate point to get fractional stops of compensation.
regards,
Anthony Farr
- Original Message ---
Look, I shoot BW Neg film about 90% of the
time and often shoot WITHOUT meter when
its a clear sunny day outdoors. My exposures
are truly excellent under those conditions and
they could be characterized as "consistently accurate exposures"
but I do not claim them to be within 1/3 stop of absolute p
Should be "Hensel 3200 and 6000 joule packs"
- Original Message -
From: "Anthony Farr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(snip)
> For instance my
> Metz 60CT-1 has full power duration of 1/400sec, and the big Hensel 3200
and
> 600 joule packs I formerly used burned for about 1/100sec at high powers
>
<< Oh, they have a sense of humor all right. I has to do with you bending over
stark naked and them running fingers into your body cavities.
>>
Tom, yes these are the amateur proctologist plod to whom I was referring.
Kind regards
Peter
- Original Message -
From: "Thomas Heide Clausen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Unfortunately a) I fly a lot and b) no matter what the rulebook says
> even for US airport security, a hand-inspection is not always easy to
> get. It depends a lot on the mood of the person at the checkpoint --
> and I
Hi!
An *ist brochure can be downloaded from Pentax Canada:
http://www.pentaxcanada.com/products/pdf/ist_eng.pdf
At the last page, it shows an *ist with the new BG-20 battery pack/hand
grip. Looks very stylish indeed.
To those who complains about cheap build quality etc. - the *ist is entry
le
At 03:44 PM 6/10/2003 +0200, Pål Jensen wrote:
This could also be a factor behind why Pentax would limit 20+ year old
lenses on the *ist D. Perhaps they aren't realy suited for a DSLR?
Another matter is that there are probably other criterias in optical
performance that is more important in a le
i just received an announcement of the release of the Nikon Coolpix 5400 in the US.
that is more or less the direct replacement to the Coolpix 5000. the newer camera has
5.4 megapixels versus 5 megapixels. the most interesting thing is that the sensor on
the new camera is about 75% of the size o
Yeah, there's not much disagreement over here about *ist being entry
level, as it is about digital ist falling into this area. Not
judging Pentax future by the *ist D specifications is too much to
ask from most of us, common mortals with normally sized pockets. At
this price tag we expec
Smaller sensor = less silicon = lower cost.
The average buyer will believe they are getting more, 400,000 pixels more in
fact. But they'll also be getting more noise and less sensitivity. Will
the Coolpix 5400 sell for less than the Coolpix 5000? Perhaps it will,
stranger things have happened.
Hi Dave,
I use muslin, its cheaper for one. I have this lady who makes custom muslin
& canvas backgrounds to any colour/design you wish. She'll also make it in
any size, a buddy just had one made thats 15m X 8m. It covers a class of 40
pupils standing and seated in 3 rows.
I don't have to care to
> I just hope they don't find out where I live.
Why, Bill, will that hurt your credibility ???
Fred
Bill Owens wrote:
>Apparently the Optio S uses a flash system similar to the MZ-S. In normal
>flash mode there are 2 quick flashed and in red eye reduction there are
>three. Has Pentax been able to get a flash sensor inside something this
>small?
I don't know how the MZ-S flash works, but I can
>Screw the Yanks. C'mon to Canada for a visit. I wanna see you, Caveman
>and Wheatfield sitting at the same table!!
>
>cheers,
>frank
Har! That would be a picture, wouldn't it ? Only if you wear some bunny
ears, and bring some bunny girls ;-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | Peo
>Now that would be a sight I'd like to see on Grandfather Mountain, a bloke
>and 2 canucks !
Seeing as this is a decent off topic thread and hopefully only those sad
sacks like me and you dip in to have a look, I'll tell you about the
security guard in our Gloucester office, colloquially known as
After reading the instruction manual AGAIN, I find that the Optio S delivers
3 flashes per exposure, both for normal and for redeye reduction, the
difference being there is a greater delay when using redeye reduction. I'm
guessing that this flash sequence is similar to that of the MZ-S, where the
Actually, I just popped into my local camera pusher's shop and
demanded to borrow and *ist with an FA-J lens. I played around with
it for a while before returning it, and my observations were
generally positive. For an entry-level camera, it seems quite good:
packed with features (which I found fai
Hi Bill,
Most likely there's no dedicated flash sensor. Instead it relies on
the ambient light sensor that measures during the pre-flash. Very
similarly to MZ-S operation in P-TTL mode.
Servus, Alin
Bill wrote:
BO> Apparently the Optio S uses a flash system similar to the M
Hi,
Thomas Heide Clausen wrote:
> I think that the big LCD on the back is superflorus
I'm not buying one, then. My hayfever and the thought of having to
stand it in water when you are not using it..
mike
Unfortunately according to the keeper of the schedule and the checkbook the
Hansons are predisposed this weekend. I'm all free next week, though.
Evan
Hello
There has been a lot of discussion lately on the future of Pentax. And
everything is nothing but pure speculation. When the MZ-50 was released, I
don't remember that we had a discussion about an aperture-less future. And
when the MZ-30 was released, I don't remember that we had a thread
>Sounds good, beware, we may really do it ;-) I'll bring the maple syrup,
>to feed Cotty with some ;-)
>
>William Robb wrote:
>>
>> The three of you are invited to my house for supper one weekend next
>> summer. I am pretty easy about which weekend, you guys choose and get
>> back to me.
>> We wi
I'll make it a point to brew some stout for you and Mark, and lagers and/or
ales for the rest of us.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "Cotty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 9:09 AM
Subject: Re: Various and sundry
> >We will eat red
It makes sense that 75% size reduction (if it's linear) leads to a 50% effective light
sensitivity reduction. If we interpolate further what will the sesnitivity of a
sensor with 2 micron sensors be? 50 ISO?
The effective sensitivity depends on the pixel area, since the quantum efficiency of
t
> Unfortunately according to the keeper
> of the schedule and the checkbook the
> Hansons are predisposed this weekend.
That's fine since Cory is busy this weekend also. He's checking on next weekend
(Saturday, June 21) and will probably get back to me soon. With respect to
weather, I think (a
From: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: Exposure (WAS: Re: OK Survey time)
Weve been down this road before, unless your
aiming your camera at a full screen 18% reflectance
subject the meter will over or under expose
the subject. the only way you could be accurate
is if you manual
The camera is located in St. Paul, MN. I would prefer
to sell everything at once, but am willing to
compromise.
Scott
--- Keith Whaley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Or Best Offer.
>
> keith
>
> Ann Sanfedele wrote:
> >
> > Scott Krahn wrote:
> >
> > > Pentax K1000 with 300mm zoom lens, wide ang
WHAT! Owens brewed stout, lagers, and ales (Oh my)
Better than lions, tigers, and bears? (oh my)
I wanna be there! I need, I need.
Folks tell me I'm a good whiner. grin.
Bill Owens wrote:
I'll make it a point to brew some stout for you and Mark, and lagers and/or
ales for the rest of us.
Bill
NIck , thanks!
Yeah and I may be able to find a smaller piece there. A much better price than K&M.
Ta,
ann
Nick Zentena wrote:
> On June 10, 2003 10:29 pm, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
> > I MUST be able to get a piece of 12" x 12" for
> > less than the $79 K and M wanted to charge me -
> > and they w
Herb Chong wrote:
> drat, i just threw out a roll about 8x20 inches.not long ago.
>
> Herb
aarrrggh! Where is telepathy when one needs it? :)
ann
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Ann Sanfedele" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 22:29
> Su
- Original Message -
From: Roland Mabo
Subject: *ist and BG-20
> And to those who judge Pentax future cameras and lenses by the entry
level
> *ist and FAJ - it's not fair to Pentax. Different market segments
needs
> different products. I see no reason to fear that the upcoming high-end
- Original Message -
From: Roland Mabo
Subject: Compatibility
> Hello
>
> There has been a lot of discussion lately on the future of Pentax. And
> everything is nothing but pure speculation. When the MZ-50 was
released, I
> don't remember that we had a discussion about an aperture-less
- Original Message -
From: Caveman
Subject: Re: Exposure
> > He sez "Perfect exposure is the exposure I want. "
> > True, this is, on the surface, a somewhat vague sounding definition,
but
> > I think that is a really good definition of the perfect exposure.
>
> I think it is just a despe
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
>
> I dont agree with your statement below that the cameras/lenses
> dont have to be very ACCURATE as well as consistent accross
> all settings to achieve 1/3 stop exposure accuracy
> under ALL conditions like he claims.
As long as they are con
Alin Flaider a écrit:
Hi Bill,
Most likely there's no dedicated flash sensor. Instead it relies on
the ambient light sensor that measures during the pre-flash. Very
similarly to MZ-S operation in P-TTL mode.
The Optio S has a flash sensor,under the flash windows !
See owner manual p
Now we see what your real definition of "perfect" exposure
is, just make everything you point the camera at medium gray regardless
of what it is in a real life scene. Absurd.
Look at what you said below. Even assuming "100%" accuracy in
METERS AND SHUTTERS which is definitely not true,
but just th
For example:
Say his lens is consistently f8 at f8 setting.
same lens is consistently f16 at f11 setting (over exaggeration).
The meter assumes both are perfect and assigns 1/125 for
the F8 setting, 1/60 for the F11 setting. THIS IS
THE MAIN FLAW OF OPEN APERTURE METERING. It doesn't
take the rea
Paul
Thanks for the link. I tried to pick my favourite, but concluded that they
were all my favourite.
Kind regards
Peter
Glenn wrote:
> IIRC the _checked_baggage_ X-ray machines can vary the
intensity.
> (Not that this contradicts anything folks have said about
the
> carry-on X-rays, even if I'm right.) I didn't think the
carry-on
> scanners could be turned up.
Hi Glenn,
At the UK's busiest international airports
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003 14:10:29 +0100
mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thomas Heide Clausen wrote:
> > I think that the big LCD on the back is superflorus
>
> I'm not buying one, then. My hayfever and the thought of having to
> stand it in water when you are not using it...
- Original Message -
From: Roland Mabo
> Ok, I understand your point. But why make assumptions, such as limited
> compatibility in future upgrade *ist bodies, about products not
relesed nor
> showned yet?
We have seen lenses for release with no aperture ring, and camera bodies
that won't
- Original Message -
From: Fred
Subject: Re: To Pentax in Japan (does anybody have their email address?)
> > I just hope they don't find out where I live.
>
> Why, Bill, will that hurt your credibility ???
No, but i don't want my home renovation project to get any bigger than
it n
- Original Message -
From: Cotty
Subject: Re: Various and sundry
> I'm cutting back on infarction-inducing fatty foods and increasing my
> intake of lipids inhibitors. Hence, I'll just have the red wine
thanks.
Well if I must cool for a parmy bloke, how about blackened catfish?
I make
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: Exposure
> For example:
>
> Say his lens is consistently f8 at f8 setting.
> same lens is consistently f16 at f11 setting (over exaggeration).
>
> The meter assumes both are perfect and assigns 1/125 for
> the F8 setting, 1/60 for
- Original Message -
From: Roland Mabo
Subject: Re: *ist and BG-20
> Pentax has promised three filmbased *ist models. One is released. Two
more
> is to come.
> I find it hard to believe that all of them is going to be entry level.
I won't believe any of them have full lens mount compat
This brings up a question. Since no one on the list ever buys a new camera
(as has been stated authoritively, by you-know-who), where are you guys
finding all those used MZ-S camera bodies?
Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
- Original Message -
From: "Ryan Charron" <[
Ebay
--- T Rittenhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >
This brings up a question. Since no one on the list
> ever buys a new camera
> (as has been stated authoritively, by you-know-who),
> where are you guys
> finding all those used MZ-S camera bodies?
>
> Ciao,
> Graywolf
> http://pages.prodigy.ne
I have a small collection of Pentax manuals I don't need, and a few
that aren't in English, so I can't read them anyway ...
Pentax MG -- original instruction manual, English
Pentax ME Super -- original instruction manual, English
Pentax Super Program -- Photocopied/bound/trimmed instruction manua
William Robb wrote:
So, in 10 words or less, how would you define "perfect exposure"?
Depends on the purpose you're taking the photos.
I already mentioned the arteestec one: "the exposure that gives the most
pleasing interpretation and visual rendition of a scene". (which is very
interesting esp
Wow, Caveman. Gee thanks, I was hoping to get that camera cheap. Now
everyone on the list knows about it. Seems to me that he gave an accurate
description of the lens, "it is perfect except for..."
Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
- Original Message -
From: "Caveman"
It's nice to hear they improved, a few years ago, before Sept. 11th I traveled
through BWT quite a few times, my connection often required I leave one
security
aria and enter another. One memorable time my wrist watch was accidently
stripped
off my wrist by contacting a security machine, I was t
No, I think he's worried about the famous Pentax ningas being dispatched.
At 08:26 AM 6/12/03 -0400, you wrote:
> I just hope they don't find out where I live.
Why, Bill, will that hurt your credibility ???
Fred
To grasp the true meaning of socialism, imagine a world where everything is
d
Roland Mabo wrote:
Just compare it with
the new Nikon F/N 75.
C'mon. Don't set the reference that low.
cheers,
caveman
I simply stated I would not use a film with 1/6 stop latitude.
If you dont like it tough. I didnt state he was wrong in using
the film, I stated he was wrong about a whole number of things
based on FACT.
JCO
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: T
T Rittenhouse wrote:
Wow, Caveman. Gee thanks, I was hoping to get that camera cheap. Now
everyone on the list knows about it. Seems to me that he gave an accurate
description of the lens, "it is perfect except for..."
Yeah, it has no faults he can see. If he can't see what the focus ring
looks li
Roland Mabo wrote:
Pentax has promised three filmbased *ist models. One is released. Two
more is to come.
Really soon.
cheers,
caveman
I'd beleive that when it for myself and
with testing equipment accurate to 1/100
of a stop becuase that is what is would require to be able to measure
that accurately. And your still not taking into account
his TTL metering technique which into itself
is not going to give correct results with
EVERY
You said you would not use a particular film, because it had 1/6 stop of latitude. How
do you know what the latitude of the film is? You don't use it. You made a definitve
statment about a definitve product that you don't know anything about.
BR
"J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I
Pål Jensen wrote:
It is about being able to set metering within 1/3 of a stop.
You don't set a meter, you read it.
Or, uh, are you talking about calibrating your meters yourself ?
cheers,
caveman
Roland Mabo wrote:
>
>Many says "Pentax are following Nikon" and seems to have
forgotten that
Nikon still supports mechanical aperture rings in their
higher end bodies. I
see no reason to why Pentax should remove full compatibility
in the semi-pro
and pro models when Nikon has showned no signs of d
"As for velvia, being "screaming obvious" different
to a 1/3 stop exposure difference, I don't use it but if it
was that sensitive, it would have an exposure latitude
of something like +/- 1/6 stops which would be
so narrow to make it unworthy of my consideration.
I doubt FUJI would even market a
Bruce, would you please cut the c**p. No one needs to buy the whole line
of Nikon cameras and use them for 6 months in order to decide if they
have a shutter release. Or maybe... is that how *you*'re doing it ?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You made a definitve statment about a definitve product that
Yea, they usually cost more there than if you buy from B&H. But they're used!
At 12:56 PM 6/12/03 -0400, you wrote:
Ebay
--- T Rittenhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >
This brings up a question. Since no one on the list
> ever buys a new camera
> (as has been stated authoritively, by you-know-w
Yes, this stupid type of argument comes up again and again.
I dont need to go to Alaska to know it snows there. Besides
I said IF in my statement
JCO
> -Original Message-
> From: Caveman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 1:30 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:
>So, in 10 words or less, how would you define "perfect exposure"?
The smudge left over after binning all the duds mate!
BB
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=| www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_
Free UK Mac Ads www.macads.co.uk
>My jerked pork or chicken is to die for
Blimey - can't remember the last time I had my pork jerked.
BB
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=| www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_
Free UK Mac Ads www.macads.co.uk
From: Caveman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Compatibility
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 13:08:10 -0400
Roland Mabo wrote:
Just compare it with the new Nikon F/N 75.
C'mon. Don't set the reference that low.
The Nikon F/N 75 is in the same market segment as the *ist.
Isn't it strange that all Nikon's mo
Now, now, boys this is a family list or so they tell me.
At 06:54 PM 6/12/03 +0100, you wrote:
>My jerked pork or chicken is to die for
Blimey - can't remember the last time I had my pork jerked.
BB
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=| www.macads.co.uk/snaps
same retail price. the 5400 is missing a couple of features and has a couple more
compared to the 5000, so it is a wash. i am one of the ones that will, if at all
possible, get a DSLR in the next year. i would like it to be a Pentax one, but if i
have to, i will pick one of the others. primary c
From: "whickersworld" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Compatibility
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 18:19:58 +0100
When claiming that Nikon's two top 'pro' Nikon film bodies
(F100 and F5) offer matrix metering with manual focus
lenses, you are obviously unaware that neither AI nor AIS
lenses cannot provide
yes, that is the linear reduction deduced from the change in true lens focal length
will maintaining 35mm effective focal length. the 5000 and 5400 both have 35mm
equivalent widest FOV of a 28mm, but the 5000 uses a 7.1 mm lens while the 5400 uses a
5.8 mm.
Herb
- Original Message -
It's the name, the name, just say Nikon, Nikon, Nikon, your
growing sleepily when you awake you will go to your local camera retailer
and buy whatever Nikon he has in stock, tomorrow all your problems will
be solved, your exposures will be perfect, (within 1/6th stop), your
composition will win awa
can't help there since i have never shot any 100S. for the time being, i am still
sticking with Provia 100F.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Cassino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 12:26
Subject: Re: Velvia 100 - F
You may include the 80 too. It also has restrictions like no metering
with older manual focus lens. Ask Bruce, he bought one and personally
checked that for at least 6 months. Funny, it really worked as in the
specs.
Roland Mabo wrote:
The Nikon F/N 75 is in the same market segment as the *ist.
Roland Mabo wrote:
The Nikon F/N 75 is in the same market segment as the *ist.
Isn't it strange that all Nikon's models below the F/N 80 are so bad
(under featured cameras with strange restrictions), and still manage to
sell in bucket loads?
It is not at all strange. It is a matter of public per
Cotty wrote:
>
> >We will eat red meat cooked rare and drink fermented fruit juices.
> >WW
>
> Fish n chips and a stout for me mate.
Oh? Ooo's yer mate, then? And yer having nothin'?
keith
> BB
>
> (British Bloke)
>
> Cheers,
> Cotty
Peter wrote:
No, I think he's worried about the famous Pentax ninjas being dispatched.
At 08:26 AM 6/12/03 -0400, you wrote:
> > I just hope they don't find out where I live.
Are those the ones in the black pajamas (they are professional you know)
with the AHOC emblem on the hood?
BUTCH
E
Bet you can
keith
Cotty wrote:
>
> >My jerked pork or chicken is to die for
>
> Blimey - can't remember the last time I had my pork jerked.
>
> BB
Will it work with the next Pentax lens mount flavour ? Will any of the
current Pentax FA lenses, including the limiteds, work with the next
Pentax lens mount flavour ? What about a new Kaf4 mount that has USM,
but is not compatible with any lens that has an aperture ring ?
These are now valid q
Daniel Liu schrieb:
>
> Well, this is a little bit arcane to say the least, but i just looked
> at this old zoom lens' mount. It sports a KA mount, only it also
> features a tiny protruding contact that doesn't touch any of the
> contacts on the camera. I looked at the inside of the lens, and it
Daniel Liu schrieb:
>
> Well, this is a little bit arcane to say the least, but i just looked
> at this old zoom lens' mount. It sports a KA mount, only it also
> features a tiny protruding contact that doesn't touch any of the
> contacts on the camera. I looked at the inside of the lens, and it
>
I've just been unsubbed. I think I've now re-subbed. We'll see...
-frank
--
"What a senseless waste of human life"
-The Customer in Monty Python's Cheese Shop sketch
Had some trouble getting onto that temporary GFM page when Mark Roberts first
referenced it, but I tried again just now and am duly blown away (as in, super
impressed) by his images.
I know this has nothing to do with Pentax or photography, but I just
heard that Gregory Peck died in his sleep last night. He was among my
favourite actors, and his portrayal of Atticus Finch in To Kill a
Mockingbird was one of the most powerful screen performances I've ever
seen.
His Atticus Fin
> -Original Message-
> From: frank theriault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I know this has nothing to do with Pentax or photography, but I just
> heard that Gregory Peck died in his sleep last night. He
> was among my
> favourite actors, and his portrayal of Atticus Finch in To Kill a
> Mo
According to reliable sources...
If this was true, then Nikon fans would be pixxed big time. What would
happen to those already expensive AF-S & VR lenses?
regards,
Alan Chan
_
Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online
http
havent seen it fully. but liked what I saw.
nice neat categorization. easy.
good pics ofcourse.
congrats!
-Sridhar
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Sawyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 6:31 AM
Subject: My Website
> Well, it's not markcassino.com.
My favs:
- Unknown plant 103.jpg
- Sworled Flower
- Eagles 101 (you already got a cave award for that one, didn't you ;-)
- The "miscellaneous images"
- The phallic B&W ones ;-)
cheers,
caveman
Bill Sawyer wrote:
Well, it's not markcassino.com. In fact, it's just MSN.Groups, but I have
some of my
Bruce R could finally do something useful and give us a summary on
what's up on the Nikon list ;-)
Alan Chan wrote:
According to reliable sources...
If this was true, then Nikon fans would be pixxed big time. What would
happen to those already expensive AF-S & VR lenses?
regards,
Alan Chan
__
To busy with my newly acquired Canon FS4000 scanner. You'll have to do
your own research.
BR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bruce R could finally do something useful and give us a summary on
what's up on the Nikon list ;-)
Alan Chan wrote:
According to reliable sources...
If this was true, then
where do you take most of your wildlife photos?
Herb
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Sawyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 21:01
Subject: My Website
> Well, it's not markcassino.com. In fact, it's just MSN.Groups, but I have
> some of my
1 - 100 of 131 matches
Mail list logo
