- MCC
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Mark Cassino Photography
Kalamazoo, MI
www.markcassino.com
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- Original Message -
From: "Herb Chong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, July 04, 2005 7:25 AM
Subject: Re: To Herb Chong et al
in th
- Original Message -
From: "Bob W" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, July 04, 2005 2:50 PM
Subject: RE: To Herb Chong et al
I give up on this thread. You really don't get it. You're so far away from
understanding why people object to what you've said
> Sent: 04 July 2005 12:53
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: To Herb Chong et al
>
> as far as i am concerned that generically describes a photo
> that will sell.
> all i have seen in the last couple of days is a few people
> who are insecure about their pho
:
Sent: Monday, July 04, 2005 1:03 AM
Subject: Re: To Herb Chong et al
IMO - If you can look at a photo for a year and still like it, if you can
articulate what the photo means and how it expresses that, if you can
understand how the design elements in the image work, then it's probab
y, July 04, 2005 1:03 AM
Subject: Re: To Herb Chong et al
And, of course, the trite and the hackneyed have tremendous
marketability - even more than the innovative and sublime. So at the end
of they day, I don't think sales really tell you much.
Hi Mark
This was by far the best contribution to this theme for me, very well
written!
thanks
Markus
>>-Original Message-
>>From: Mark Cassino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Sent: Monday, July 04, 2005 7:04 AM
>>To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
>>Subject: Re: To Her
This is one the fellow on the list who is saving quotes should save. Well
said and very true.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Mark Cassino
> Hi Boris -
>
> I have not been following the 'stinkin filters thread, but I'll jump in
here
> anyhow :-0
>
> I sell a fair number of photos, both as
On 4 Jul 2005 at 1:03, Mark Cassino wrote:
> IMO - If you can look at a photo for a year and still like it, if you can
> articulate what the photo means and how it expresses that, if you can
> understand how the design elements in the image work, then it's probably a
> good
> photo. If other p
Hi Boris -
I have not been following the 'stinkin filters thread, but I'll jump in here
anyhow :-0
I sell a fair number of photos, both as individual prints and for
publication, and I also do the occasional art fair and stint on the sales
floor in gallery co-ops, so I've had a chance to see
well, there were enough people who thought it was much better than some
minimum threshold of "goodness". after that, you have to decide if you think
the people judging had any sense or not. it certainly means that the
submitter thought they were were the best of what they had in the types of
im
Boris,
I didn't read more than the last few of the "stinkin' filters" mails,
but I think "Sales" is too broad a category to answer univocally about
it. Selling for editorial purposes means you have a useable photo at
the right time for the editor who needs it. Selling for decoration of
people'
On 3/7/05, Boris Liberman, discombobulated, unleashed:
>What about those photos that participate in (international) contests and
>get mentions or even prizes?
No use asking me Boris. I believe all photographic competitions to be
meaningless, because in my opinion it is not possible to judge art.
12 matches
Mail list logo
