>The Adobe RAW pre-sets don't align at all well with the camera pre-sets
>and you monitor doesn't need to be calibrated to remedy the problem.
>Your query prompted me to do something that I've thought about on and
>off but had not yet done. I've just created a set of camera RAW WB
>pre-sets for
The Adobe RAW pre-sets don't align at all well with the camera pre-sets
and you monitor doesn't need to be calibrated to remedy the problem.
Your query prompted me to do something that I've thought about on and
off but had not yet done. I've just created a set of camera RAW WB
pre-sets for the
oftware.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: "Frantisek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Joseph Tainter"
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2005 12:03 PM
Subject: Re: CS2 Raw Converter Query
it's not unusal for the camera maker own software to have quite better &
more accur
except Joe's problem isn't a color temperature problem, it's a color
management problem.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2005 7:50 AM
Subject: Re: CS2 Raw Converter Query
The
JT> My gripe/query is that the presets in Pentax's Raw converter (for
JT> daylight, shade, flash, etc.) always gave good color, with no color
JT> cast. I bought CS2 mainly because I had read about how good the Raw
JT> converter is. I find that its presets imparts a warm color cast. My
JT> computer,
Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>The color temperature is completely adjustable with the PSCS RAW
>converter. Just look for the slider that says "temperature." You can
>vary it from way too cold to way too warm on any RAW image.
Pixmantec's free "Rawshooter Essentials" also lets you d
Thanks Rob.
I usually use either auto or manual WB, but will give them a try with the Ds.
Powell
>Down-load the following file:
>
>http://www.home.aone.net.au/audiobias/temp/ist_D_WB_settings.zip
>
>..and place the files in:
>
>\Program Files\Adobe\Photoshop CS\Presets\Camera Raw
>
>You can th
I find the "As Shot" temperature to be very accurate as well. I
sometimes change it a bit for aesthetic reasons, but it's certainly not
difficult to end up exactly where you want to be.
Paul
On Jun 26, 2005, at 10:43 PM, Rob Studdert wrote:
On 26 Jun 2005 at 22:26, Paul Stenquist wrote:
You c
On 26 Jun 2005 at 22:26, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> You can't adjust "color ting," but you can adjust color tint. Rob's
> presets should help you start closer to where you want to be.
I forgot to add that the "As Shot" WB is accurate, it is derived from the WB
data integrated in the file whether
On 26 Jun 2005 at 19:02, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> I can't speak for everyone on this list, but I've been running color-
> managed image processing for at least the last decade, although there
> have been massive improvements in stability and ease of setup in the
> past 4-5 years.
I run a fu
You can't adjust "color ting," but you can adjust color tint. Rob's
presets should help you start closer to where you want to be.
On Jun 26, 2005, at 10:06 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
The color temperature is completely adjustable with the PSCS RAW
converter. Just look for the slider that says "
On 26 Jun 2005 at 19:20, Joseph Tainter wrote:
> My gripe/query is that the presets in Pentax's Raw converter (for
> daylight, shade, flash, etc.) always gave good color, with no color
> cast. I bought CS2 mainly because I had read about how good the Raw
> converter is. I find that its presets
The color temperature is completely adjustable with the PSCS RAW
converter. Just look for the slider that says "temperature." You can
vary it from way too cold to way too warm on any RAW image. You can
also adjust overall ting.
On Jun 26, 2005, at 8:27 PM, Joseph Tainter wrote:
I am not happy
On Jun 26, 2005, at 6:48 PM, Joseph Tainter wrote:
Okay, you guys may be right. I may have to look into color
management. What I've read about it so far, though, I haven't found
comprehensible. Is there a decent source in ordinary English for
non-technos?
Color Management theory is compl
"If you are using Photoshop CS2 and you haven't set up its color
management preferences, you cannot get consistency and accuracy in your
color rendering. You can set it up with no additional cost, using
software calibration approximations, or you can buy a decent hardware
colorimeter and calibr
idn't
change anything, they are all wrong.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: "Joseph Tainter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2005 9:13 PM
Subject: Re: CS2 Raw Converter Query
"how are your color profiles and color management set up? what pro
On Jun 26, 2005, at 6:13 PM, Joseph Tainter wrote:
"how are your color profiles and color management set up? what
profile are you shooting in, what profile are you specifying at
conversion time? what have you got set up for color settings when
reading an image that has an embedded color pro
My gripe/query is that the presets in Pentax's Raw converter (for
daylight, shade, flash, etc.) always gave good color, with no color
cast. I bought CS2 mainly because I had read about how good the Raw
converter is. I find that its presets imparts a warm color cast. My
computer, monitor, and pr
"how are your color profiles and color management set up? what profile
are you shooting in, what profile are you specifying at conversion time?
what have you got set up for color settings when reading an image that
has an embedded color profile?"
Beats me, Herb. I haven't ventured into color m
how are your color profiles and color management set up? what profile are
you shooting in, what profile are you specifying at conversion time? what
have you got set up for color settings when reading an image that has an
embedded color profile?
Herb
On 26 Jun 2005 at 18:27, Joseph Tainter wrote:
> I am not happy with the Photoshop CS2 Raw converter. It consistently
> gives images that are much too warm. I did not have this problem with
> Pentax's Raw converter. I would just go back to using the Pentax
> converter except that the Photoshop
I am not happy with the Photoshop CS2 Raw converter. It consistently
gives images that are much too warm. I did not have this problem with
Pentax's Raw converter. I would just go back to using the Pentax
converter except that the Photoshop one has so many nice features.
Any thoughts or advice?
22 matches
Mail list logo
