http://home.earthlink.net/~pdml-pics/not-dead.jpg
Just a quick and dirty snap ... but it depicts a Universal Truth
Can
you find the deeper meaning hidden within the arcane symbolism?
Hmm. "Stuffed toy mooseheads support film forever?"
Godfrey
Daniel Liu wrote:
Hi, just want to get some opinions. I'm planning on getting an istds
and a 28mm prime, and I like to do low-light work. Which lens would
you pick, the sigma 28mm 1.8 or the FA pentax 28mm 2.8? I'm used to
shooting at a very crappy-looking iso400 on a canon g3 at f/2, but I
figu
Hello Daniel,
Depending on your shooting style, KEH has two Pentax M series 28/2.0
lenses. This will give you the speed and good ISO performance - best
of both worlds.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Friday, June 24, 2005, 9:04:06 PM, you wrote:
DL> Hi, just want to get some opinions. I'm planning on
- Original Message -
From: "Shel Belinkoff"
Subject: PAW PESO GESO POW WOW ZOWIE - Film is Not Dead
http://home.earthlink.net/~pdml-pics/not-dead.jpg
Just a quick and dirty snap ... but it depicts a Universal Truth
Can
you find the deeper meaning hidden within the arcane symbolis
Daniel,
You have to define low-light work to me. I customarily shoot in
'concert-like' settings; dark surroundings with spotlights on performers...
I do not have either of the lenses you mention. I do use the FA* 24/2
simply because it has the largest aperture. This way I can adjust the
I
Hi, just want to get some opinions. I'm planning on getting an istds
and a 28mm prime, and I like to do low-light work. Which lens would
you pick, the sigma 28mm 1.8 or the FA pentax 28mm 2.8? I'm used to
shooting at a very crappy-looking iso400 on a canon g3 at f/2, but I
figure i'll be getting a
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Tom Reese"
Subject: Re: Are your photos too good?
Mark (the Enabler) Roberts wrote:
Tom Reese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I really would like to shoot some landscapes with one. I bet that
thing gives some incredible full frame persp
Tom Reese wrote:
Bill Robb made a most generous offer:
If you promise not to steal it, maybe we could arrange a loan (of his A
15/3.5).
Thank you for the offer Bill. I really appreciate it but I never borrow
anything I can't easily replace. I couldn't stand the guilt if something
hap
Hey, are you suggesting I only use Pentax?
Shel (Leica-Yashicamat-Sony-Olympus-Rollei owner/user)
> [Original Message]
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> If everyone on this left because they bought something other than a
> Pentax, it would just be Shel and some guy in downtown Toronto
> left.An
Herb Chong wrote:
the Sigma 12-24 is pretty good and not hugely expensive. mine is very
sharp. from comments here and other places, it seems that it suffers
from the usual Sigma problem of not so great QC. i got lucky and got a
good example. won't be as flare resistant as the Pentax, and bokeh
Hey Don.
No need to leave just because you bought a Canon.
If everyone on this left because they bought something other than a Pentax, it
would just
be Shel
and some guy in downtown Toronto left.And maybe Cotty as he has assimulated some
equipment.
LOL
Stick around and do some Paw's
Dave(who ha
Hi Tim.
As the resident Equine guy, i'll give that one a thumbs up.:-)
I like the loose forlock and the focus on my monitor looks very good.
Nice photo and the lighting is fine IMO
Dave
> Another horse: It is the "friend" of
my last one. This one was
2 8x10 modern film holders. Ex. Cond.
$30 each.
4 8x10 wood film holders. Ex. Cond.
$20 each.
8x10 sheet film -- a bunch of Ilford, all good, and some Super XX that I've
not tried.
At least 75 sheets, probably closer to 90 or 100 sheets.
$100
Fuji film changing tent. W
ActiveUndelete for 39.95 will let me undelete the files on the 512 card &
recover all the lost ones.
They've note been over-written yet.
So it looks like they can be recovered.
:)
Collin
Film photographers have antlers?
On Jun 24, 2005, at 6:41 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
http://home.earthlink.net/~pdml-pics/not-dead.jpg
Just a quick and dirty snap ... but it depicts a Universal Truth
Can
you find the deeper meaning hidden within the arcane symbolism?
Shel
> Hi!
>
> Dave, there is a program called "Oscar Renamer" that makes bulk renaming
> as easy as editing a text file in text editor...
>
> If you wish I can send you its setup file. It is free-ware...
>
> Boris
>
Thanks Boris.
Mark enlightend moi with
Only one... That we know of
Mat Maessen wrote:
I thought they had bunny ears...
-Mat
On 6/24/05, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Film photographers have antlers?
--
A man's only as old as the woman he feels.
--Groucho Marx
> Jim Hemenway wrote:
>
> > Yup, I'm very happy with the 14mm on my isDS. It's about equal to a
> > 21mm on a 35mm film SLR.
> >
> > Jim
> >
> >
> > Herb Chong wrote:
> >
> >> well, on the *istD, the DA 14 is a good substitute.
>
> GHAA
>
> To
I thought they had bunny ears...
-Mat
On 6/24/05, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Film photographers have antlers?
> ann
>
> p.s. Frank will not have to sleep directly on the
> floor - I have a big
> air mattress and a small foam one. (future
> reference for possible
> pentaxian visits)
Ya had to bring up foam did'nt you.
Dave
Actually we are trying to stop our Trakehner from doing this. Distracts the
judges.LOL
Nice link, thanks Herb
Dave
>
http://www.workshop.org/pages/digital/pages/zuckerman_dig_dram_nature.html
>
> Herb
> - Original Message -
> From: <[EMAIL PROTE
Navitar 1" f2.8 projection lens. For carousel projectors.
Excellent condition.
This ultra-wide lens will fill a wall at close proximity!
$50 shipped in US
Hey, I knew a guy named Verne Kalpers ... sold autos in Georgia, he did
could this be the same guy?
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Rob Studdert
> I just found a magnet strong enough to extract the BB and it's 1.98mm
diameter
> according to my vernier calipers.
Hi Pat,
Yes, that's an Optio X, the moose isn't real ...
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Pat Kong
> Film may not be dead, but is that a real dead moose? Along w/ an Optio X
on
> display?
>
> -Pat in SF
>
> --- Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > http://home.earthlink.net/~pdml-p
On 24 Jun 2005 at 15:41, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> http://home.earthlink.net/~pdml-pics/not-dead.jpg
>
> Just a quick and dirty snap ... but it depicts a Universal Truth Can
> you
> find the deeper meaning hidden within the arcane symbolism?
Neither is the moose, it's all just pretend :-)
Rob
the Sigma 12-24 is pretty good and not hugely expensive. mine is very sharp.
from comments here and other places, it seems that it suffers from the usual
Sigma problem of not so great QC. i got lucky and got a good example. won't
be as flare resistant as the Pentax, and bokeh is different in a w
On 24 Jun 2005 at 12:27, pentax-discuss@pdml.net wrote:
> The one in an A50/1.2 (which I just happen to have in bits at the moment) is
> about 2mm in diameter (it's quite difficult to get this one out of its recess)
I just found a magnet strong enough to extract the BB and it's 1.98mm diameter
a
PAW PESO GESO POW WOW ZOWIE
Enough acronyms for sure.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
http://home.earthlink.net/~pdml-pics/not-dead.jpg
Just a quick and dirty snap ... but it depicts a Universal Truth Can
you find the deeper meaning hidden within the arcane symbolism?
Shel
--
A man's only
Very, very true.
Tom Reese wrote:
Herb Chong replied to my comments about wanting a 15/3.5 by writing:
well, on the *istD, the DA 14 is a good substitute.
That might be but it's a terrible substitute for a slide shooter using
an MZ-S.
Tom Reese
--
A man's only as old as the woman h
On 24 Jun 2005 at 9:50, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hello, I'm new to the list, but not photography..
>
> My first Pentax was a Spotmatic around 1968. For film, I mostly shoot old
> Leica M, For all slr stuff including macro work, I use a Pentax *ist Ds.
>
> I have done a PAW for four
Jim Hemenway wrote:
Yup, I'm very happy with the 14mm on my isDS. It's about equal to a
21mm on a 35mm film SLR.
Jim
Herb Chong wrote:
well, on the *istD, the DA 14 is a good substitute.
GHAA
Tom Reese
Herb Chong replied to my comments about wanting a 15/3.5 by writing:
well, on the *istD, the DA 14 is a good substitute.
That might be but it's a terrible substitute for a slide shooter using
an MZ-S.
Tom Reese
Thanks Godfrey, the data sheet makes it worse by listing Tri-X Pan,
and Tri-X Pan Professional as the same dev. time and Professional
Tri-X 400 as a seperate item at 6 3/4 minutes.
I guess the word "Pan" is the key to the older consumer film.
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: Godfrey DiGi
They list the 320 seperately at 9 minutes at 68F.
Tri-X Pan and Tri-X Pan Pro at 8 minutes.
Professional Tri-X 400 at 6 3/4 minutes.
Wierd.
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: J. C. O'Connell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, June 24, 2005 6:49 PM
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Sub
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 13:49:18 -0400, Dave Kennedy wrote:
> I'm going to have to get off this list. LensLust is getting too much to bear.
> On 6/24/05, mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Chad wrote:
> > > FA*28-70/2.8 $500
Yep, I want an FA* 28-70/2.8 so bad I can taste it, myself.
TTY
Dredging out of my memory of film things, Tri-X Pan was the standard,
normal, consumer film you found in most photo stores. Tri-X
Professional had a softer gamma curve with a longer toe region.
They're similar but different emulsions.
Godfrey
On Jun 24, 2005, at 4:34 PM, Don Sanderson wro
because Im pretty sure one is rated 320 instead of 400.
JCO
-Original Message-
From: Don Sanderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2005 7:35 PM
To: PDML
Subject: OT: Tri-X question for you B&W shooters.
I see Tri-X packaged as "Tri-X Pan" and "Tri-X Professional".
I ass
i got mine from KEH in EX condition probably better than described for $560
last summer. the lens was there maybe a day before i bought.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: "mike wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2005 1:26 PM
Subject: Re: FS: *istD, FA*24, FA* 28-
Yup, I'm very happy with the 14mm on my isDS. It's about equal to a
21mm on a 35mm film SLR.
Jim
Herb Chong wrote:
well, on the *istD, the DA 14 is a good substitute.
Herb...
- Original Message - From: "Tom Reese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2005 6:28 AM
Subject
I see Tri-X packaged as "Tri-X Pan" and "Tri-X Professional".
I assumed there was no real difference as I've also seen it
advertised as Pro when the package said Pan and the other
way around.
Talking strictly about the ISO 400 flavor here.
Kodak only lists the Pro on their web site as near as I can
having owned the Sigma 15-30 and now the Sigma 12-24, both of which were
usable on a film body, i have to say that wide is good and wider is
insurance.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Reese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2005 7:32 AM
Subject: Re: Are your pho
well, on the *istD, the DA 14 is a good substitute.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Reese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2005 6:28 AM
Subject: Re: Are your photos too good?
BTW, curse you and that 15/3.5 lens. You got my curiosity up and I've been
wanting on
do the book anyway, but looking for a moderately large local non-profit
nature organization is the best for this kind of thing. you probably don't
have the rigor and coverage that an educational institution would require.
along with the images, i suggest setting up an education fund to continue
Film may not be dead, but is that a real dead moose? Along w/ an Optio X on
display?
-Pat in SF
--- Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://home.earthlink.net/~pdml-pics/not-dead.jpg
>
> Just a quick and dirty snap ... but it depicts a Universal Truth Can
> you find the deeper meani
http://home.earthlink.net/~pdml-pics/not-dead.jpg
Just a quick and dirty snap ... but it depicts a Universal Truth Can
you find the deeper meaning hidden within the arcane symbolism?
Shel
The numbers dont tell the whole story, you have to see it through a
viewfinder, (and in a picture).
Tom Reese wrote:
P. J. Alling wrote this about the different angle of view between the 15mm
and 20mm pentax lenses:
The actual 5° would make an enormous difference, 15° would make a
stupend
#1. Pentax K-1000 in excellent condition. $80 shipped in US
#2. Sears 135/2.8, 1:5 macro, clean, M-class, $20 shipped in US
#3. JC Penny 135/2.8, clean, M-class, $15 shipped in US.
Or all 3 together for $100 shipped in US.
PayPal.
Collin
Hi Sonny,
Welcome aboard.
I admire your web site and the many pictures it contains.
It is a great display of works.
Regards, Bob S.
On 6/24/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello, I'm new to the list, but not photography..
>
> My first Pentax was a Spotmatic around 1968.
Hi!
Dave, there is a program called "Oscar Renamer" that makes bulk renaming
as easy as editing a text file in text editor...
If you wish I can send you its setup file. It is free-ware...
Boris
Hi!
Fresh out of the oven...
http://www.photosight.ru/photo.php?photoid=918724&ref=author
After I took the shot I had a very good laff...
Boris
Good grab. And yes, it is quite humorous. Nice one.
Paul
> Hi!
>
> Fresh out of the oven...
>
> http://www.photosight.ru/photo.php?photoid=918724&ref=author
>
> After I took the shot I had a very good laff...
>
> Boris
>
Nice to meet you and a bit of your "Fri Flowers". Well
done.
Have you been posting to another list? Leica?
Welcome,
Jack (35mm/6x6 film)
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
this adds a few more shots
http://www.alphoto.com/co05/page1.htm
I'm going to have to get off this list. LensLust is getting too much to bear.
dk
On 6/24/05, mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Chad wrote:
>
> > Shipping to U.S. only.
>
>
>
> > FA*28-70/2.8 $500
> > EX condition. I bought this lens used. I only have the lens, front and
> > back ca
Chad wrote:
Shipping to U.S. only.
FA*28-70/2.8 $500
EX condition. I bought this lens used. I only have the lens, front and
back caps, and the hood. The glass is in great shape. The hood shows
some wear and tear. Mainly rub and scuff marks. The body of the lens
is in like new condition.
Nice work! And welcome to the list. When I get a chance, I'll look
back through some of your other stuff. Hope to see you contributing.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Friday, June 24, 2005, 6:50:27 AM, you wrote:
Sac> Hello, I'm new to the list, but not photography..
Sac> My first Pentax was a
Terms of sale:
To inquire about any of these items, or other concerns you might have,
please send a Email. I have taken pics of most of the items. I can
Email a image upon request.
The condition of each item is noted along with any accessories,
manuals, cables, etc that might be included.
Paymen
On 24/6/05, Cohn Don, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I have finally made the jump to a DSLR and after much hand wringing I
>decided to go with the 20D. Horrible, I know. I have been a silent lurker
>here for many years. I made one single photo contribution to the PUG back in
>January of 2002. But I
The actual 5° would make an enormous difference, 15° would make a
stupendous difference
Tom Reese wrote:
Mark (the Enabler) Roberts wrote:
Tom Reese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I really would like to shoot some landscapes with one. I bet that
thing gives some incredible full frame perspec
On Jun 23, 2005, at 4:47 PM, William Robb wrote:
I have yet to decide whether I consider the hot pixels important
enough to send the camera in for service, given that my usual RAW
image processing workflow eliminates them. I might hold off until
I purchase my planned second body as othe
After viewing this a couple of times, I rather like it. Your
positioning of him off center works for me, and I think that some of
his personality really comes out.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Thursday, June 23, 2005, 10:11:30 PM, you wrote:
SB> When this fellow saw that I had a camera, he asked to
On 24/6/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>Hello, I'm new to the list, but not photography..
>
>My first Pentax was a Spotmatic around 1968. For film, I mostly shoot old
>Leica M, For all slr stuff including macro work, I use a Pentax *ist Ds.
>
>I have done a PAW for fo
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
To recapture their lost youth?
Shel
Maybe. Lost something.
This "kid" has lost a lot, and prospects are pretty dim, but he tries to
put on an aura of devil-may-care distain at the world...
Sad.
- keith
[Original Message]
From: keithw
I've a 48 year old ex-son-i
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Thanks ... I tried several times and the page just doesn't come up for me.
Plus, email to you bounces.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: luben karavelov
Hello Shell,
I have made the cuts and crops of the test. These are 2 shots made on f8
at about 1/125 by hand. Th
On 24/6/05, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
>http://www.robertstech.com/graphics/pages/7d202422.htm
Hm.
Look mighty familiar!!!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
Hi Sonny
Welcome to the list. Spectacular flower shot. I especially liked the
lighting on it. The bee was a plus.
Butch
I'll second that (in fact I was just about to suggest them myself).
I first encountered Johnsonville Brats in the midwest (at Road America).
Upon arriving home, I was extremely pleased to find them on the shelves
of my local supermarket (Nob Hill Foods, now a part of Raleys).
On Fri, Jun 24, 20
Hello Tim,
It catches your attention. It does seem a bit flat, more like you
need to work with levels a bit - more so than just exposure.
I do have to say, that while it is very different, it doesn't really
hold much interest or intrigue for me.
Thanks for sharing,
Bruce
Friday, June 24, 200
P. J. Alling wrote this about the different angle of view between the 15mm
and 20mm pentax lenses:
> The actual 5° would make an enormous difference, 15° would make a
> stupendous difference
Hmmm. I used the Field Of View Calculator on Boz's website:
http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/technology/fov.ht
Welcome to the list Sonny.
Hope you can handle the traffic!
A very nicely done image. I might crop it a bit more tightly, but I'd be happy
if this was mine as is.
BTW are you the originator of the 'Sonny 16' "rule"
Kenneth Waller
(whose been thru Natchitoches, Louisiana)
-Original Messag
Hi,
I've been messing with microscopes and
the cameras I use are not Pentax. But
I'd love to put a *ist D on the top of
the trinocular tube! It would save an
awful lot of time used for processing
and scanning.
But it's quite amazing what a modified
Webcam can do at 1280 x 960.
Best,
D
Very nice. Wonderfully sharp, given the subject.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/24/05 9:50 AM >>>
Hello, I'm new to the list, but not photography..
My first Pentax was a Spotmatic around 1968. For film, I mostly shoot old
Leica M, For all slr stuff including macro work, I use a Pentax *ist Ds
I usually turn off the red focus indicators on the screen when doing
manual focus too.
I don't like having the central focus indicator pop up in the middle
of my trying to see the sharpest focus point. I usually ignore the
green indicator too. ... It seems to me that one sometimes lights an
Hello Sonny
Good to see you here! The PDML is way more active than either PAW or
SeePhoto ... Haven't been on the LEG for many years now, but it's
certainly at least equal to what that was at its height for me.
Godfrey
On Jun 24, 2005, at 6:50 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello, I'm new
Thanks ... I tried several times and the page just doesn't come up for me.
Plus, email to you bounces.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: luben karavelov
> Hello Shell,
> I have made the cuts and crops of the test. These are 2 shots made on f8
> at about 1/125 by hand. The film is Ilford PAN
Bill Robb made a most generous offer:
> If you promise not to steal it, maybe we could arrange a loan (of his A
15/3.5).
Thank you for the offer Bill. I really appreciate it but I never borrow
anything I can't easily replace. I couldn't stand the guilt if something
happened to it while it was in
Right now, with a great help from Boris, I'm bidding on a 28MM 2.8 CSJ
I really hope that it worth the trouble to get your credit card over the
net...
otherwise i will come back looking for a cheap M42 Russian lens like Mir
or something like that at the local photo-junk stores.
BTW... tomorrow
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Reese"
Subject: Re: Are your photos too good?
I really would like to shoot some landscapes with one. I bet that thing
gives some incredible full frame perspective.
If you promise not to steal it, maybe we could arrange a loan.
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Reese"
Subject: Re: Are your photos too good?
Mark (the Enabler) Roberts wrote:
Tom Reese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I really would like to shoot some landscapes with one. I bet that thing
gives some incredible full frame perspective.
http://ww
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the offer. Unfortunately I'm on a slow, dialup connection and
it would take forever to download those photos. I'm assuming they are in
16bit Tiff format. Perhaps if converted to 8bit and saved as a high
resolution JPEG their size would be more manageable.
Welcome to the list, Sonny. Very nice flower pic. Great DOF control. Looking
forward to seeing more of your work.
Paul Stenquist
> Hi, Sonny
>
> Welcome to the list. I sometimes visit the LEG and have been surprised at
> the number of people using various non-Leica digital cameras. My GF
Cory Papenfuss wrote:
How is that? I'll try it, but I'm just wondering how it's
easier... less distraction while you twiddle to find the "green hex?"
Right
-Cory
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005, Joaquim Carvalho wrote:
It's a lot easier to use the focus assist with the central LED
switched off
I have finally made the jump to a DSLR and after much hand wringing I
decided to go with the 20D. Horrible, I know. I have been a silent lurker
here for many years. I made one single photo contribution to the PUG back in
January of 2002. But I must say, I have learned a lot from all of you and to
t
Hi, Sonny
Welcome to the list. I sometimes visit the LEG and have been surprised at
the number of people using various non-Leica digital cameras. My GF enjoys
your flower pics.
This is a much more active list than the LEG. We have a PAW and PESO
(Picture Every So Often) thing going here,
How is that? I'll try it, but I'm just wondering how it's
easier... less distraction while you twiddle to find the "green hex?"
-Cory
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005, Joaquim Carvalho wrote:
It's a lot easier to use the focus assist with the central LED switched off
(an option on the settings menu)
To recapture their lost youth?
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: keithw
> I've a 48 year old ex-son-in-law who lives there now. Spikey purple and
> orange hair. He and this guy would be a pair!
> Why the old guys still go for the outrageous haircuts and colors, who
knows?
danilo wrote:
My girlfriend has a Vivitar 19/3.5 (for yashica, but I think it is
also available for pentax K).
I'm not able to tell if it is a good lens or not, but from what I saw
it seems to ship contrasty (?) pics and is also well flare-resistant
(even with the sun in the pic flare are few).
O
Hello, I'm new to the list, but not photography..
My first Pentax was a Spotmatic around 1968. For film, I mostly shoot old
Leica M, For all slr stuff including macro work, I use a Pentax *ist Ds.
I have done a PAW for four years. I also do a weekly series called "Friday
Flowers," now
It's a lot easier to use the focus assist with the central LED switched
off (an option on the settings menu)
This is in very good condition, all systems go, no cosmetic or functional
issues other than the missing eye cup, which I lost because they come off
easily. To make up for that, I'm including the cable release for this camera.
$160 includes shipping.
http://members.cox.net/mark.lindamood/ZX5n
mike wilson wrote:
> You must be living in a different country to me. Are you on
> chalk? We have a clay substrate here and it takes much
> longer for the rainwater to disperse, if it's not causing
> flash floods.
I can guide this back on topic to photography at this point, because in the
la
Sid,
I know of a Pro who has an arrangement with an institution (Library or some
such, might be a charity - I can't remember) that upon his demise, his images
and all the rights will pass into their control.
You might approach an appropriate arboretum or museum or the like and see if
they migh
>
> From: "Doug Franklin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2005/06/24 Fri PM 12:42:31 GMT
> To: "pentax-discuss@pdml.net"
> Subject: Re: Re: Paw: The scent of early summer
>
> On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 7:38:04 +, mike wilson wrote:
>
> > On an industrial estate in town (east coast of England) next to
>
> From: Boris Liberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2005/06/24 Fri PM 01:37:39 GMT
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: PESO: Tight horse, no title.
>
> Hi!
>
> > Another horse: It is the "friend" of my last one. This one was less shy.
> > It is slightly out of focus. I'm used to a man
Looks like a FREE camera to me.
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Jun 24, 2005 8:41 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PAW PESO - Sidewalk Universe: The Accidental Astronaut
Hi Frank what kind of camera is a f*** ?
Shel
> [
What Shel said ?
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PAW PESO - Sidewalk Universe: The Accidental Astronaut
Boris,
I'm surprised that you don't see the universality of the allegorical
metaphor defined by the randomness of largest g
Don Williams wrote ...
HEY! You're back!!
When did you come back? Have you been lurking?
Good to see you.
ERNR
Looks more like the heavy shade on the underside of a tree.
Nice doodle.
But is it art?
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: Boris Liberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PAW PESO - Sidewalk Universe: The Accidental Astronaut
Hi!
> It's certainly not a photograph While playin
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 13:24:00 +0200, Tim Øsleby wrote:
> http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildegalleri/vis_bilde.cgi?id=181143
I like it. I'd also like to see a shot from the same position that's
vertically oriented, so you see more of his nose and mane.
TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 21:08:22 +1200, David Mann wrote:
> Already got one.
"I told him we already got one. [snicker]"
TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ
1 - 100 of 142 matches
Mail list logo
