Herb Chong wrote:
the Sigma 12-24 is pretty good and not hugely expensive. mine is very
sharp. from comments here and other places, it seems that it suffers
from the usual Sigma problem of not so great QC. i got lucky and got a
good example. won't be as flare resistant as the Pentax, and bokeh is
different in a way that you may not like, but it works on a film body
and isn't as expensive as a good example of a Pentax A 15/3.5. i can't
recommend the Sigma 15-30. you can try the Tamron 14. it works on a film
body, has AF, and is better than the Sigma 14. it'll cost you though.
Thanks for the info Herb. I wasn't aware that the Tamron lens existed.
You're right, it is expensive.
Tom Reese
- Re: Are your photos too good? Tom Reese
-