Who needs them with digital... "you just crank up the ISO speed dial"
The faster it was turned, the higher the ISO was.
regards,
Alan Chan
_
The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=f
Who needs them with digital... "you just crank up the ISO speed dial"
Alan Chan wrote:
LOL. Maybe Nikon's larger mount will be compatible to the Pentax
645NII...;-) Or even larger - 67?
Cool! Canon will be no match to Nikon for any super fast lenses.
regards,
Alan Chan
_
LOL. Maybe Nikon's larger mount will be compatible to the Pentax
645NII...;-) Or even larger - 67?
Cool! Canon will be no match to Nikon for any super fast lenses.
regards,
Alan Chan
_
MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 mon
Hi Caveman,
on 12 Jun 03 you wrote in pentax.list:
>Bruce R is probably eating his foot now...
LOL. Maybe Nikon's larger mount will be compatible to the Pentax
645NII...;-) Or even larger - 67?
Cheers, Heiko
Here's a question. How comparable do people find the meters on their
different cameras?
For example, ought one not to get (+ or - 1 stop) the same exposure reading
from a grey card in the same light using the same lens on an LX, K1000 and
ME Super?
I compared the readings of my Z-1p & MX against m
I think Audrey Hepburn made her first movie appearance in this film. Can't
recall if got an Academy Award for her performance. A young Eddie Albert was
in it too. He didn't gain fame until "Green Acres" on TV with one of the
Gabor sisters.
Jim A.
> From: frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Or
Believe it or not, yes - there's one in the next town over from us.
>
> Hmmm... do some of those drive-in cinemas still exist there in yankee-land
?
>
> cheers,
> caveman
>
>
At 04:49 PM 6/9/2003 +1000, Rob Studdert wrote:
OK the D *ist isn't in our hands so we can only speculate based on what's
been
reported. So given what is known who of those of us that envisage moving into
digital are likely to purchase a D *ist and why?
Who of us think it's time to move to the d
A vivitar 283 with an omni-bounce would do it, though "smallish" isn't
necessarily a word I'd use to describe a 283...
-Mat
tom wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Does any one know of a smallish flash that will work with a
24mm lens?
I'm just after some
Dunno whether anyone else will find this the least bit interesting,
but it kind of amused me to figure it out. A friend asked how many
rolls to take on a 15-day trip to England and Germany, which got me
wondering how many rolls I burn in one day of shooting. She wanted
to know what an "average"
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Hi,
>
> Does any one know of a smallish flash that will work with a
> 24mm lens?
>
> I'm just after something basic with auto and manual.
>
A Sto-Fen Omnibounce will allow you to cover 24mm with any flash.
tv
My MZ-3 and PZ-20 are also about 1/3 a stop metering
off a grey card, and they are with in a 1/3 of my
gossen luna six digtal pro to.
--- Mat Maessen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My ME
Super, Super Program, and MX are all within a
> third of a stop of
> each other, metering off a grey card that
Hi,
Does any one know of a smallish flash that will work with a 24mm lens?
I'm just after something basic with auto and manual.
Pauk
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
as a teen... lots of other great things, too. THe consumate movie star - and
oh those eyebrows!
annfan :)
Hmmm... do some of those drive-in cinemas still exist there in yankee-land ?
cheers,
caveman
Kevin Waterson wrote:
> What was the Peck movie where Peck played a man returned from war. Later he must
> admit to his wife that during his service he had a liason with a women and from
> that liason a child was born. The woman contacts Peck and asks for money to help
> support the child.
>
> Thi
Jim Apilado wrote:
> I enjoyed his performances in "Twelve O'Clock High" and "Roman Holiday".
> "To Kill a Mockingbird" is a video used by English lit teachers at the high
> school I just retired from.
>
> Jim A.
>
I just wrote Frank privately mentioning that old silly movie Duel in the Sun.
I ac
Kevin Waterson spake thusly:
"What was the Peck movie where Peck played a man returned from war. Later he must
admit to his wife that during his service he had a liason with a women and from
that liason a child was born. The woman contacts Peck and asks for money to help
support the child."
I bel
So, just curious, how quickly do the pentax flashes fully discharge?
eg, 200T, 280T, 200SA, 400T, and others?
--Daniel Liu
"It's no longer a question of staying
healthy. It's a question of finding a
sickness you like."
On Thursday, Jun 12, 2003, at 03:33 U
My ME Super, Super Program, and MX are all within a third of a stop of
each other, metering off a grey card that fills the frame.
Haven't done any testing to see if the weighting is different, but they
seem pretty close in that regard too.
My Gossen LunaPro F also agrees with the metering in all
> http://groups.msn.com/wsawyerphotography/shoebox.msnw
nice photos, Bill. Out of the flower category, I particularly like "Sworled
Flower". I find that shot quite outstanding for some reason, and I'm not much
of a "botanical guy".
As for the wildlife images... dem is some colorful frogs! In
. "Eagles 101" is also a great shot - name it "Bush & Cheney"
and sell it to Time or Newsweek :-0
Actually, Mark, I was thinking of the opposite end of a different species
for that shot, but, then, that's for another time and place, huh. ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Mark Cassino
Quoting Albano Garcia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> www.gratisweb.com/albanogarcia
Nice shots, Albano. Of course, I've seen most of them over time in the PUG, but
it's even better being able to see them collectively. I still think the shot
with the shoe and the guy lounging around (I think you titled
We get tons (gaggles?) of the latter, too. And I got vaccinated for the
former two years ago, I'm around them quite a bit.
-Original Message-
From: Herb Chong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: June 12, 2003 10:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: My Website
all we seem to
Thank you, Sridhar.
-Original Message-
From: arathi-sridhar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: June 12, 2003 9:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: My Website
havent seen it fully. but liked what I saw.
nice neat categorization. easy.
good pics ofcourse.
congrats!
-Sridhar
Thanks, Ken.
-Original Message-
From: Ken Archer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: June 12, 2003 5:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: My Website
"Two Fawns" is just too much. Wish I had taken it. ;-)
On Friday 13 June 2003 01:01 am, Bill Sawyer wrote:
> Well, it's not
all we seem to get around here is deer. Lyme's Disease capital of the world. and
Canada geese.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Sawyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 22:27
Subject: RE: My Website
> Just outside of Detroit, where I li
Replay interspersed...
My favs:
- Unknown plant 103.jpg
Does anybody know what it is?
- Sworled Flower
I like that one myself...
- Eagles 101 (you already got a cave award for that one, didn't you ;-)
You're forgiven ;-)
- The "miscellaneous images"
I need to do more
- The phallic B&W ones ;-)
Ye
"Two Fawns" is just too much. Wish I had taken it. ;-)
On Friday 13 June 2003 01:01 am, Bill Sawyer wrote:
> Well, it's not markcassino.com. In fact, it's just MSN.Groups, but I
> have some of my photos up on a website. Finally.
>
> http://groups.msn.com/wsawyerphotography/shoebox.msnw
>
> Your
C'est bon, Paul!
Great day's work and many fascinating glimpses into the city. Must of been
fun!
- MCC
At 01:08 PM 6/9/2003 -0400, you wrote:
On a recent business trip to Paris I decided to stay over one day and
shoot some film. I had only my 1953 vintage Leica iiif and Summicron
50/2, but t
Just outside of Detroit, where I live, Herb. It's a large park with a very
good nature center. Name is Kensington Metropark. The Michigan PDML has met
there couple of times. Others are at our Zoo. I spend a lot of time in both
locations.
-Original Message-
From: Herb Chong [mailto:[EMA
Hey Bill -
Looks great!
I have always admired your deer photos, and it's great that they are out
for all to see. "Doe in Lace" and "Whitetail Fawn" are particularly
excellent. "Eagles 101" is also a great shot - name it "Bush & Cheney"
and sell it to Time or Newsweek :-0
I like all of the
where do you take most of your wildlife photos?
Herb
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Sawyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 21:01
Subject: My Website
> Well, it's not markcassino.com. In fact, it's just MSN.Groups, but I have
> some of my
To busy with my newly acquired Canon FS4000 scanner. You'll have to do
your own research.
BR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bruce R could finally do something useful and give us a summary on
what's up on the Nikon list ;-)
Alan Chan wrote:
According to reliable sources...
If this was true, then
Bruce R could finally do something useful and give us a summary on
what's up on the Nikon list ;-)
Alan Chan wrote:
According to reliable sources...
If this was true, then Nikon fans would be pixxed big time. What would
happen to those already expensive AF-S & VR lenses?
regards,
Alan Chan
__
My favs:
- Unknown plant 103.jpg
- Sworled Flower
- Eagles 101 (you already got a cave award for that one, didn't you ;-)
- The "miscellaneous images"
- The phallic B&W ones ;-)
cheers,
caveman
Bill Sawyer wrote:
Well, it's not markcassino.com. In fact, it's just MSN.Groups, but I have
some of my
havent seen it fully. but liked what I saw.
nice neat categorization. easy.
good pics ofcourse.
congrats!
-Sridhar
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Sawyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 6:31 AM
Subject: My Website
> Well, it's not markcassino.com.
According to reliable sources...
If this was true, then Nikon fans would be pixxed big time. What would
happen to those already expensive AF-S & VR lenses?
regards,
Alan Chan
_
Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online
http
> -Original Message-
> From: frank theriault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I know this has nothing to do with Pentax or photography, but I just
> heard that Gregory Peck died in his sleep last night. He
> was among my
> favourite actors, and his portrayal of Atticus Finch in To Kill a
> Mo
I know this has nothing to do with Pentax or photography, but I just
heard that Gregory Peck died in his sleep last night. He was among my
favourite actors, and his portrayal of Atticus Finch in To Kill a
Mockingbird was one of the most powerful screen performances I've ever
seen.
His Atticus Fin
Had some trouble getting onto that temporary GFM page when Mark Roberts first
referenced it, but I tried again just now and am duly blown away (as in, super
impressed) by his images.
I've just been unsubbed. I think I've now re-subbed. We'll see...
-frank
--
"What a senseless waste of human life"
-The Customer in Monty Python's Cheese Shop sketch
Daniel Liu schrieb:
>
> Well, this is a little bit arcane to say the least, but i just looked
> at this old zoom lens' mount. It sports a KA mount, only it also
> features a tiny protruding contact that doesn't touch any of the
> contacts on the camera. I looked at the inside of the lens, and it
>
Daniel Liu schrieb:
>
> Well, this is a little bit arcane to say the least, but i just looked
> at this old zoom lens' mount. It sports a KA mount, only it also
> features a tiny protruding contact that doesn't touch any of the
> contacts on the camera. I looked at the inside of the lens, and it
Will it work with the next Pentax lens mount flavour ? Will any of the
current Pentax FA lenses, including the limiteds, work with the next
Pentax lens mount flavour ? What about a new Kaf4 mount that has USM,
but is not compatible with any lens that has an aperture ring ?
These are now valid q
Bet you can
keith
Cotty wrote:
>
> >My jerked pork or chicken is to die for
>
> Blimey - can't remember the last time I had my pork jerked.
>
> BB
Peter wrote:
No, I think he's worried about the famous Pentax ninjas being dispatched.
At 08:26 AM 6/12/03 -0400, you wrote:
> > I just hope they don't find out where I live.
Are those the ones in the black pajamas (they are professional you know)
with the AHOC emblem on the hood?
BUTCH
E
Cotty wrote:
>
> >We will eat red meat cooked rare and drink fermented fruit juices.
> >WW
>
> Fish n chips and a stout for me mate.
Oh? Ooo's yer mate, then? And yer having nothin'?
keith
> BB
>
> (British Bloke)
>
> Cheers,
> Cotty
Roland Mabo wrote:
The Nikon F/N 75 is in the same market segment as the *ist.
Isn't it strange that all Nikon's models below the F/N 80 are so bad
(under featured cameras with strange restrictions), and still manage to
sell in bucket loads?
It is not at all strange. It is a matter of public per
You may include the 80 too. It also has restrictions like no metering
with older manual focus lens. Ask Bruce, he bought one and personally
checked that for at least 6 months. Funny, it really worked as in the
specs.
Roland Mabo wrote:
The Nikon F/N 75 is in the same market segment as the *ist.
can't help there since i have never shot any 100S. for the time being, i am still
sticking with Provia 100F.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Cassino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 12:26
Subject: Re: Velvia 100 - F
It's the name, the name, just say Nikon, Nikon, Nikon, your
growing sleepily when you awake you will go to your local camera retailer
and buy whatever Nikon he has in stock, tomorrow all your problems will
be solved, your exposures will be perfect, (within 1/6th stop), your
composition will win awa
yes, that is the linear reduction deduced from the change in true lens focal length
will maintaining 35mm effective focal length. the 5000 and 5400 both have 35mm
equivalent widest FOV of a 28mm, but the 5000 uses a 7.1 mm lens while the 5400 uses a
5.8 mm.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: "whickersworld" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Compatibility
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 18:19:58 +0100
When claiming that Nikon's two top 'pro' Nikon film bodies
(F100 and F5) offer matrix metering with manual focus
lenses, you are obviously unaware that neither AI nor AIS
lenses cannot provide
same retail price. the 5400 is missing a couple of features and has a couple more
compared to the 5000, so it is a wash. i am one of the ones that will, if at all
possible, get a DSLR in the next year. i would like it to be a Pentax one, but if i
have to, i will pick one of the others. primary c
Now, now, boys this is a family list or so they tell me.
At 06:54 PM 6/12/03 +0100, you wrote:
>My jerked pork or chicken is to die for
Blimey - can't remember the last time I had my pork jerked.
BB
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=| www.macads.co.uk/snaps
From: Caveman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Compatibility
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 13:08:10 -0400
Roland Mabo wrote:
Just compare it with the new Nikon F/N 75.
C'mon. Don't set the reference that low.
The Nikon F/N 75 is in the same market segment as the *ist.
Isn't it strange that all Nikon's mo
>My jerked pork or chicken is to die for
Blimey - can't remember the last time I had my pork jerked.
BB
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=| www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_
Free UK Mac Ads www.macads.co.uk
>So, in 10 words or less, how would you define "perfect exposure"?
The smudge left over after binning all the duds mate!
BB
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=| www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_
Free UK Mac Ads www.macads.co.uk
Yes, this stupid type of argument comes up again and again.
I dont need to go to Alaska to know it snows there. Besides
I said IF in my statement
JCO
> -Original Message-
> From: Caveman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 1:30 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:
Yea, they usually cost more there than if you buy from B&H. But they're used!
At 12:56 PM 6/12/03 -0400, you wrote:
Ebay
--- T Rittenhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >
This brings up a question. Since no one on the list
> ever buys a new camera
> (as has been stated authoritively, by you-know-w
Bruce, would you please cut the c**p. No one needs to buy the whole line
of Nikon cameras and use them for 6 months in order to decide if they
have a shutter release. Or maybe... is that how *you*'re doing it ?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You made a definitve statment about a definitve product that
"As for velvia, being "screaming obvious" different
to a 1/3 stop exposure difference, I don't use it but if it
was that sensitive, it would have an exposure latitude
of something like +/- 1/6 stops which would be
so narrow to make it unworthy of my consideration.
I doubt FUJI would even market a
Roland Mabo wrote:
>
>Many says "Pentax are following Nikon" and seems to have
forgotten that
Nikon still supports mechanical aperture rings in their
higher end bodies. I
see no reason to why Pentax should remove full compatibility
in the semi-pro
and pro models when Nikon has showned no signs of d
Pål Jensen wrote:
It is about being able to set metering within 1/3 of a stop.
You don't set a meter, you read it.
Or, uh, are you talking about calibrating your meters yourself ?
cheers,
caveman
You said you would not use a particular film, because it had 1/6 stop of latitude. How
do you know what the latitude of the film is? You don't use it. You made a definitve
statment about a definitve product that you don't know anything about.
BR
"J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I
I'd beleive that when it for myself and
with testing equipment accurate to 1/100
of a stop becuase that is what is would require to be able to measure
that accurately. And your still not taking into account
his TTL metering technique which into itself
is not going to give correct results with
EVERY
Roland Mabo wrote:
Pentax has promised three filmbased *ist models. One is released. Two
more is to come.
Really soon.
cheers,
caveman
T Rittenhouse wrote:
Wow, Caveman. Gee thanks, I was hoping to get that camera cheap. Now
everyone on the list knows about it. Seems to me that he gave an accurate
description of the lens, "it is perfect except for..."
Yeah, it has no faults he can see. If he can't see what the focus ring
looks li
I simply stated I would not use a film with 1/6 stop latitude.
If you dont like it tough. I didnt state he was wrong in using
the film, I stated he was wrong about a whole number of things
based on FACT.
JCO
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: T
Roland Mabo wrote:
Just compare it with
the new Nikon F/N 75.
C'mon. Don't set the reference that low.
cheers,
caveman
No, I think he's worried about the famous Pentax ningas being dispatched.
At 08:26 AM 6/12/03 -0400, you wrote:
> I just hope they don't find out where I live.
Why, Bill, will that hurt your credibility ???
Fred
To grasp the true meaning of socialism, imagine a world where everything is
d
It's nice to hear they improved, a few years ago, before Sept. 11th I traveled
through BWT quite a few times, my connection often required I leave one
security
aria and enter another. One memorable time my wrist watch was accidently
stripped
off my wrist by contacting a security machine, I was t
Wow, Caveman. Gee thanks, I was hoping to get that camera cheap. Now
everyone on the list knows about it. Seems to me that he gave an accurate
description of the lens, "it is perfect except for..."
Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
- Original Message -
From: "Caveman"
William Robb wrote:
So, in 10 words or less, how would you define "perfect exposure"?
Depends on the purpose you're taking the photos.
I already mentioned the arteestec one: "the exposure that gives the most
pleasing interpretation and visual rendition of a scene". (which is very
interesting esp
I have a small collection of Pentax manuals I don't need, and a few
that aren't in English, so I can't read them anyway ...
Pentax MG -- original instruction manual, English
Pentax ME Super -- original instruction manual, English
Pentax Super Program -- Photocopied/bound/trimmed instruction manua
Ebay
--- T Rittenhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >
This brings up a question. Since no one on the list
> ever buys a new camera
> (as has been stated authoritively, by you-know-who),
> where are you guys
> finding all those used MZ-S camera bodies?
>
> Ciao,
> Graywolf
> http://pages.prodigy.ne
This brings up a question. Since no one on the list ever buys a new camera
(as has been stated authoritively, by you-know-who), where are you guys
finding all those used MZ-S camera bodies?
Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
- Original Message -
From: "Ryan Charron" <[
- Original Message -
From: Roland Mabo
Subject: Re: *ist and BG-20
> Pentax has promised three filmbased *ist models. One is released. Two
more
> is to come.
> I find it hard to believe that all of them is going to be entry level.
I won't believe any of them have full lens mount compat
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: Exposure
> For example:
>
> Say his lens is consistently f8 at f8 setting.
> same lens is consistently f16 at f11 setting (over exaggeration).
>
> The meter assumes both are perfect and assigns 1/125 for
> the F8 setting, 1/60 for
- Original Message -
From: Cotty
Subject: Re: Various and sundry
> I'm cutting back on infarction-inducing fatty foods and increasing my
> intake of lipids inhibitors. Hence, I'll just have the red wine
thanks.
Well if I must cool for a parmy bloke, how about blackened catfish?
I make
- Original Message -
From: Fred
Subject: Re: To Pentax in Japan (does anybody have their email address?)
> > I just hope they don't find out where I live.
>
> Why, Bill, will that hurt your credibility ???
No, but i don't want my home renovation project to get any bigger than
it n
- Original Message -
From: Roland Mabo
> Ok, I understand your point. But why make assumptions, such as limited
> compatibility in future upgrade *ist bodies, about products not
relesed nor
> showned yet?
We have seen lenses for release with no aperture ring, and camera bodies
that won't
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003 14:10:29 +0100
mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thomas Heide Clausen wrote:
> > I think that the big LCD on the back is superflorus
>
> I'm not buying one, then. My hayfever and the thought of having to
> stand it in water when you are not using it...
Glenn wrote:
> IIRC the _checked_baggage_ X-ray machines can vary the
intensity.
> (Not that this contradicts anything folks have said about
the
> carry-on X-rays, even if I'm right.) I didn't think the
carry-on
> scanners could be turned up.
Hi Glenn,
At the UK's busiest international airports
Paul
Thanks for the link. I tried to pick my favourite, but concluded that they
were all my favourite.
Kind regards
Peter
For example:
Say his lens is consistently f8 at f8 setting.
same lens is consistently f16 at f11 setting (over exaggeration).
The meter assumes both are perfect and assigns 1/125 for
the F8 setting, 1/60 for the F11 setting. THIS IS
THE MAIN FLAW OF OPEN APERTURE METERING. It doesn't
take the rea
Now we see what your real definition of "perfect" exposure
is, just make everything you point the camera at medium gray regardless
of what it is in a real life scene. Absurd.
Look at what you said below. Even assuming "100%" accuracy in
METERS AND SHUTTERS which is definitely not true,
but just th
Alin Flaider a écrit:
Hi Bill,
Most likely there's no dedicated flash sensor. Instead it relies on
the ambient light sensor that measures during the pre-flash. Very
similarly to MZ-S operation in P-TTL mode.
The Optio S has a flash sensor,under the flash windows !
See owner manual p
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
>
> I dont agree with your statement below that the cameras/lenses
> dont have to be very ACCURATE as well as consistent accross
> all settings to achieve 1/3 stop exposure accuracy
> under ALL conditions like he claims.
As long as they are con
- Original Message -
From: Caveman
Subject: Re: Exposure
> > He sez "Perfect exposure is the exposure I want. "
> > True, this is, on the surface, a somewhat vague sounding definition,
but
> > I think that is a really good definition of the perfect exposure.
>
> I think it is just a despe
- Original Message -
From: Roland Mabo
Subject: *ist and BG-20
> And to those who judge Pentax future cameras and lenses by the entry
level
> *ist and FAJ - it's not fair to Pentax. Different market segments
needs
> different products. I see no reason to fear that the upcoming high-end
- Original Message -
From: Roland Mabo
Subject: Compatibility
> Hello
>
> There has been a lot of discussion lately on the future of Pentax. And
> everything is nothing but pure speculation. When the MZ-50 was
released, I
> don't remember that we had a discussion about an aperture-less
Herb Chong wrote:
> drat, i just threw out a roll about 8x20 inches.not long ago.
>
> Herb
aarrrggh! Where is telepathy when one needs it? :)
ann
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Ann Sanfedele" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 22:29
> Su
NIck , thanks!
Yeah and I may be able to find a smaller piece there. A much better price than K&M.
Ta,
ann
Nick Zentena wrote:
> On June 10, 2003 10:29 pm, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
> > I MUST be able to get a piece of 12" x 12" for
> > less than the $79 K and M wanted to charge me -
> > and they w
WHAT! Owens brewed stout, lagers, and ales (Oh my)
Better than lions, tigers, and bears? (oh my)
I wanna be there! I need, I need.
Folks tell me I'm a good whiner. grin.
Bill Owens wrote:
I'll make it a point to brew some stout for you and Mark, and lagers and/or
ales for the rest of us.
Bill
The camera is located in St. Paul, MN. I would prefer
to sell everything at once, but am willing to
compromise.
Scott
--- Keith Whaley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Or Best Offer.
>
> keith
>
> Ann Sanfedele wrote:
> >
> > Scott Krahn wrote:
> >
> > > Pentax K1000 with 300mm zoom lens, wide ang
From: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: Exposure (WAS: Re: OK Survey time)
Weve been down this road before, unless your
aiming your camera at a full screen 18% reflectance
subject the meter will over or under expose
the subject. the only way you could be accurate
is if you manual
> Unfortunately according to the keeper
> of the schedule and the checkbook the
> Hansons are predisposed this weekend.
That's fine since Cory is busy this weekend also. He's checking on next weekend
(Saturday, June 21) and will probably get back to me soon. With respect to
weather, I think (a
It makes sense that 75% size reduction (if it's linear) leads to a 50% effective light
sensitivity reduction. If we interpolate further what will the sesnitivity of a
sensor with 2 micron sensors be? 50 ISO?
The effective sensitivity depends on the pixel area, since the quantum efficiency of
t
I'll make it a point to brew some stout for you and Mark, and lagers and/or
ales for the rest of us.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "Cotty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 9:09 AM
Subject: Re: Various and sundry
> >We will eat red
1 - 100 of 131 matches
Mail list logo