John,
We (authors) believe version 12 (
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-color/12/) addresses
all the comments that have been raised so far.
Regards,
-Pavan (on behalf of the authors)
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 7:57 AM John Scudder wrote:
> Hi Authors,
>
> It looks like there
Christer,
Thanks for the review.
Please see inline (prefixed VPB).
Regards,
-Pavan (on behalf of the authors)
On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 5:52 AM Christer Holmberg via Datatracker <
nore...@ietf.org> wrote:
> Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
> Review result: Ready with Nits
>
> I am the assigned Gen-AR
For formality:
* Draft: draft-many-pce-stateful-amendment (to be posted this weekend) /
coupled with draft-koldychev-pce-operational (hopefully a new 08to be posted
before IETF lock but TBD)
* Presenter: Andrew Stone
* In person
* Duration 5 -10m
* Reminder to WG of this d
Hi PCE WG, friendly reminder for the below!
Thanks
Andrew
PCE Secretary
From: Dhruv Dhody
Date: Friday, February 14, 2025 at 11:22 PM
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: pce-chairs
Subject: Call for slot in the PCE WG at IETF 122
CAUTION: This is an external email. Please be very careful when clicking links
Pavan (and Dhruv),
Thanks for your reply and the change in -12.
As a side note about “less continue what PCE did in other docs”, this would
prevent evolution though ;-) But, this is a detail
Regards
-éric
From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram
Date: Thursday, 27 February 2025 at 08:47
To: Dhruv Dhody
Cc
