Yip yip yip yip yahoo like Rush Limbaw says. I love it. Yeah I was never
a big fan of MP3. But maybe the PTR1's yucky 64 KBPS MP3 jaded me.
On 5/16/2017 6:14 PM, Dane Trethowan wrote:
Yep subject line says everything, the format is dead and no new
licences will be issued to continue supporting
Geez, such negativity around here!
There is nothing in the world wrong with a 320 k mp3 at 44.1 khz stereo.
Listen on a good set of speakers and you will see. Not as good as a
lossless file for sure, but unless you're an audio snob, there's nothing
wrong with it.
and now that the li
Ah than saddly I guess I am an audio snob then. lol I can hear the
mp3ness to some MP3s. Fair though some are better than others. But meh I
prefer PCM WAV thanks. lol Na but maybe the matalicness of the PTR
incoder jaded me like I said before.
On 5/17/2017 1:30 PM, Chris Skarstad wrote:
I've been doing my cd, vinyl and tape rips all at 320k-bit, and hear nothing
wrong. Quite offen some transcode their stuff making it look like it's been
done at 320k-bit, but it's artificial. I'll continue to use the format until
suddenly it magicly stops working, but that will happen when john
Yeah and in all honesty the MP3 incoder of the LS-14 is pretty good.
Like I said before I think I'm just jaded because of the PTR1 and 2 then
the MileStone 311.
On 5/17/2017 1:40 PM, Byron Stephens wrote:
I've been doing my cd, vinyl and tape rips all at 320k-bit, and hear
nothing wrong. Quit
Does this now mean that new recorders and recording software will not
offer mp3 anymore? Or will they make it open sorce for use with open
sorce software?
On 17/05/2017, Hamit Campos wrote:
> Yeah and in all honesty the MP3 incoder of the LS-14 is pretty good.
> Like I said before I think I'm jus
