Re: Re[2]: VIrtual cable.

2006-06-14 Thread Brent Harding
rick Perdue" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 1:33 AM Subject: Re[2]: VIrtual cable. > Hello Brent, > > On Tuesday, June 13, 2006, 9:36:09 PM, you bellowed the following: >> I was thinking of it for recording Sk

Re[2]: VIrtual cable.

2006-06-13 Thread Patrick Perdue
Hello Brent, On Tuesday, June 13, 2006, 9:36:09 PM, you bellowed the following: > I was thinking of it for recording Skype since I don't want to send > the callers sound back to himself and make conferences sound like trash. Well, Skype conferences sound like trash by default, so that's out alre

Re[2]: VIrtual cable.

2006-06-13 Thread Patrick Perdue
Hello Brent, On Tuesday, June 13, 2006, 2:53:16 PM, you bellowed the following: > Oh, I found some instructions around once that allow you to use Winamp > plugins on the whole output if you set Vac as the default card, but this > would cause me to get no speech as the screen reader would want to

Re: Re[2]: VIrtual cable.

2006-06-11 Thread Brent Harding
ather having me use CMedia drivers with my Turtle Beach, which sounds about telephone quality as I accidentally did it once. - Original Message - From: "Patrick Perdue" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 11:36 P

Re[2]: VIrtual cable.

2006-06-09 Thread Patrick Perdue
Brent: You really don't want to do that! Since there is no hardware involved, you get no anti-aliasing. So, unless you only want everything to come out at 11,025 khz, you'll get tons of aliasing over the virtual cable. Plus, you'll lose a good deal of responsiveness by using a software synth over