Hi, Jiaju
Thank you for merging it!
Thanks,
Yusuke
(2013/05/29 14:52), Jiaju Zhang wrote:
Hi Yuusuke,
Merged, thanks!
Regards,
Jiaju
On Mon, 2013-05-27 at 16:26 +0900, Yuusuke Iida wrote:
Hi, Jiaju
I made the daemon who supervises the resource depending on a ticket, in
order to solve this
Hi Yuusuke,
Merged, thanks!
Regards,
Jiaju
On Mon, 2013-05-27 at 16:26 +0900, Yuusuke Iida wrote:
> Hi, Jiaju
>
> I made the daemon who supervises the resource depending on a ticket, in
> order to solve this problem.
>
> I have sent the following "pull request".
> https://github.com/jjzhang/bo
Hi, Jiaju
I made the daemon who supervises the resource depending on a ticket, in
order to solve this problem.
I have sent the following "pull request".
https://github.com/jjzhang/booth/pull/52
The feature is as follows.
- The information on the ticket to supervise is acquired from the
configur
Hi, Jiaju
Thank you for reply.
(2012/03/05 14:00), Jiaju Zhang wrote:
> Hi Yuusuke,
>
> On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 11:49 +0900, Yuusuke Iida wrote:
>> Hi, Jiaju
>>
>> I thought about a plan to deal when a resource did not change in sites.
>> I think that I make daemon working outside booth.
>>
>> Thi
Hi Yuusuke,
On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 11:49 +0900, Yuusuke Iida wrote:
> Hi, Jiaju
>
> I thought about a plan to deal when a resource did not change in sites.
> I think that I make daemon working outside booth.
>
> This daemon watches it whether a resource can work in sites.
> And it executes revoke
Hi, Jiaju
I thought about a plan to deal when a resource did not change in sites.
I think that I make daemon working outside booth.
This daemon watches it whether a resource can work in sites.
And it executes revoke command for booth when the state that a resource
cannot manage was confirmed.
boo
Hi, Jiaju
(2012/02/24 19:38), Jiaju Zhang wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 11:10 +0900, Yuusuke Iida wrote:
>> Hi, Jiaju
>>
>> I want to ask some questions about booth.
>>
>> I confirm movement of booth by the following constitution.
>> node1, node2 - siteA(grant ticket)
>> node3, node4 - siteB
>> a
On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 11:10 +0900, Yuusuke Iida wrote:
> Hi, Jiaju
>
> I want to ask some questions about booth.
>
> I confirm movement of booth by the following constitution.
> node1, node2 - siteA(grant ticket)
> node3, node4 - siteB
> arbitrator
>
> 1.
> boothd which moved in node1 did failov
Hi, Jiaju
I want to ask some questions about booth.
I confirm movement of booth by the following constitution.
node1, node2 - siteA(grant ticket)
node3, node4 - siteB
arbitrator
1.
boothd which moved in node1 did failover by trouble to node2.
Though booth is rebooted then during the validity of
