On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 11:10 +0900, Yuusuke Iida wrote: > Hi, Jiaju > > I want to ask some questions about booth. > > I confirm movement of booth by the following constitution. > node1, node2 - siteA(grant ticket) > node3, node4 - siteB > arbitrator > > 1. > boothd which moved in node1 did failover by trouble to node2. > Though booth is rebooted then during the validity of the ticket, as for > the ticket, it is done failover to siteB. > As for me, boothd was started in node2 and hoped that grant was > maintained in siteA. > Will you examine a correction of the present behavior?
Yes, what you wanted is also the expected behavior, it should be a bug. > > 2. > When the resource that there is in conjunction with the ticket breaks > down in succession and was not able to start in site A, booth does nothing. > In this case I think that site B is not used effectively. > Does booth have the plan corresponding to such a problem? Yes. Thanks for reporting this! I'll take this in my bug list. For now, I have just set up an environment in my lab to do more integrated testing. There are some known issues founded, and the fixes will happen soon. Thanks a lot;) Jiaju _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
