On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
> 05.11.2012 08:40, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov
>> wrote:
>>> 02.11.2012 02:05, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 5:09 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov
wrote:
> 01.11.2012 0
05.11.2012 08:40, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov
> wrote:
>> 02.11.2012 02:05, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 5:09 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov
>>> wrote:
01.11.2012 02:47, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
...
>>
>> One remark about
On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Matthew O'Connor wrote:
>
> On 10/29/2012 08:14 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> Option 3 is where things are headed, however the only distro that ships it
>> today is Fedora-17 (and shortly 18).
>> In this scenario, all components obtain membership and quorum directly
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
> 02.11.2012 02:05, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 5:09 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov
>> wrote:
>>> 01.11.2012 02:47, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>> ...
>
> One remark about that - it requires that gfs2 communicates with dlm
On 10/29/2012 08:14 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> Option 3 is where things are headed, however the only distro that ships it
> today is Fedora-17 (and shortly 18).
> In this scenario, all components obtain membership and quorum directly from
> corosync.
> So far OCFS2 is the only component that ha
02.11.2012 02:05, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 5:09 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov
> wrote:
>> 01.11.2012 02:47, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> ...
One remark about that - it requires that gfs2 communicates with dlm in
the kernel space - so gfs_controld is not longer required.
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 5:09 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
> 01.11.2012 02:47, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> ...
>>>
>>> One remark about that - it requires that gfs2 communicates with dlm in
>>> the kernel space - so gfs_controld is not longer required. I think
>>> Fedora 17 is the first version with th
01.11.2012 02:53, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 6:15 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov
> wrote:
>> 29.10.2012 19:51, Bernardo Cabezas Serra wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> disclaimer: I have posted this issue to linux-ha list too a couple of
>>> days ago. I'm sorry if this is not the correct list
01.11.2012 02:47, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
...
>>
>> One remark about that - it requires that gfs2 communicates with dlm in
>> the kernel space - so gfs_controld is not longer required. I think
>> Fedora 17 is the first version with that feature. And it is definitely
>> not available for EL6 (centos6
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 8:42 PM, Bernardo Cabezas Serra
wrote:
>
> El 2012-10-30 02:14, Andrew Beekhof escribió:
>
>
>> Have you read Section 8.1 and 8.2 of Clusters from Scratch?
>>
> http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/en-US/Pacemaker/1.1-plugin/html/Clusters_from_Scratch/ch08.html#id985586tl:dr
>>
>
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 6:15 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov
wrote:
> 29.10.2012 19:51, Bernardo Cabezas Serra wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> disclaimer: I have posted this issue to linux-ha list too a couple of
>> days ago. I'm sorry if this is not the correct list, and thanks if you
>> can give me a hint about w
ctober 29, 2012 11:51:51 AM
>>> Subject: [Pacemaker] Build dlm_controld for pacemaker stack
>>> (dlm_controld.pcmk)
>>>
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> disclaimer: I have posted this issue to linux-ha list too a couple of
>>> days ago. I'
El 2012-10-30 09:15, Vladislav Bogdanov escribió:
What exactly errors do you see? Pacemaker APIs used there received
some
changes between 1.1.7 and 1.1.8.
I was doing things wrong, mixing suse dlm code with upstream pacemaker
versions, and got lots of API errors, I think are not relevant, th
El 2012-10-30 02:14, Andrew Beekhof escribió:
Have you read Section 8.1 and 8.2 of Clusters from Scratch?
http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/en-US/Pacemaker/1.1-plugin/html/Clusters_from_Scratch/ch08.html#id985586tl:dr
- its very important that all parts of the stack are making decisions
based o
29.10.2012 19:51, Bernardo Cabezas Serra wrote:
> Hello,
>
> disclaimer: I have posted this issue to linux-ha list too a couple of
> days ago. I'm sorry if this is not the correct list, and thanks if you
> can give me a hint about which cluster stack should I use for ocfs2 by now.
>
> I'm trying
29.10.2012 22:10, David Vossel wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Bernardo Cabezas Serra"
>> To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
>> Sent: Monday, October 29, 2012 11:51:51 AM
>> Subject: [Pacemaker] Build dlm_controld for pacemaker st
On 30/10/2012, at 3:51 AM, Bernardo Cabezas Serra wrote:
> Hello,
>
> disclaimer: I have posted this issue to linux-ha list too a couple of days
> ago. I'm sorry if this is not the correct list, and thanks if you can give me
> a hint about which cluster stack should I use for ocfs2 by now.
>
- Original Message -
> From: "Bernardo Cabezas Serra"
> To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
> Sent: Monday, October 29, 2012 11:51:51 AM
> Subject: [Pacemaker] Build dlm_controld for pacemaker stack
> (dlm_controld.pcmk)
>
>
> Hello,
>
> discl
Title: APSL
Hello,
disclaimer: I have posted this issue to linux-ha list too a couple
of days ago. I'm sorry if this is not the correct list, and thanks
if you can give me a hint about which cluster stack should I use for
ocfs2 by now.
I'm trying to com
19 matches
Mail list logo
