On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Matthew O'Connor <m...@ecsorl.com> wrote: > > On 10/29/2012 08:14 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> Option 3 is where things are headed, however the only distro that ships it >> today is Fedora-17 (and shortly 18). >> In this scenario, all components obtain membership and quorum directly from >> corosync. >> So far OCFS2 is the only component that hasn't been updated to support this. >> This option requires corosync 2.x + pacemaker 1.1.7 or later > > This is an interesting thread to me because I am about to upgrade from > Ubuntu 11.10 to 12.04. Consequently, it seems I'll have to update > OCFS2's cluster stack from PCMK to CMAN. I can't seem to figure a way > past it. (Why wasn't CMAN compiled into v1.1.5 for U-11.10? > Nevermind...it's unimportant now.)
It may not have been fully baked at that point. > > I'd love to go to Option 3, but if OCFS2 isn't there...well...any idea > when it will be? Probably an OCFS2-maintainer question - if so, I > apologize for asking it here. Right, its pretty much up to the OCFS2 maintainer and/or SUSE. Although I wouldn't expect SUSE to take much interest until they start thinking about SLES12 (I have no idea when that might be). > > Considering that the Pacemaker package is built and ready, but is stuck > back on v1.1.6, would v1.1.8 be worth building from source and deploying? Absolutely. > > -- Matthew > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org > _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
