|
Hello,
disclaimer: I have posted this issue to linux-ha list too a couple of days ago. I'm sorry if this is not the correct list, and thanks if you can give me a hint about which cluster stack should I use for ocfs2 by now. I'm trying to compile all stack for corosync + pacemaker + dlm + ocfs2 (with dlm_controld.pmk), without cman stack. I'm following the "From source" Pacemaker guide. After some days trying to compile the correct combination of sources/versions, I have no success, and I'm not sure if at this moment this is possible. The fist problem was that cluster removed support for dlm_controld with pacemaker stack. Last version with support was 3.0.17. But this was done some years ago, and as far as I have been able to understand, things are still broken. The most relevant info found about this issue are these threads from Andrew Beekhof and Vladislav Bogdanov, wich suggest to compile dlm_controld from Cluster, applying some patches. They report it worked (whith some remaining issues): http://oss.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/2009-October/003064.html http://www.mail-archive.com/pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org/msg09959.html But most recent issue about this is a year ago, and seems that things are still broken. I haven't been able to compile, with lots of errors, so I'm currently asking if this is the right way, becouse seems that nobody else is willing to use this... At cluster page, they state that now DLM code has been separated from cluster: https://fedorahosted.org/cluster/wiki/HomePage But this dlm project (that seems to have pcmk support), depends on corosync 2.0, so it can't run with last pacemaker (1.1.8). (can it?) http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/dlm.git Before spending more time with this, I wanted to ask for the right way to do things. So Questions are: (1) Is it by now possible to get an ocfs2 corosync + pacemaker cluster, without cman, and dlm_controld with pcmk stack? (if yes which repos/versions)? (2) What is the future roadmap about this? Will future corosync2.0 cluster have dlm issues addressed? Also, I have read (also Andrew post) that OCFS2 cluster could have problems on top of corosync 2.0, as OCFS2 has't ben ported (GFS2 was ported). http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/pacemaker/78538 so: (3) Is GSF2 a better future option in terms of support, for linux-ha clusters? More details about pcmk dlm_controld: I found that Suse have always been mantaining cman-free cluster stack, so I have tried to find dlm in its packages. Found: http://rpmfind.net//linux/RPM/opensuse/factory/x86_64/libdlm-3.00.01-24.5.x86_64.html But also I have had lots of compilation problems, trying several pacemaker, versions, also the suse-patched ones. Haven't been able to successfully complie a dlm_controld. Thanks and Regards, Bernardo --
|
_______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
