Version 2 attached. This version includes the suggested commit message
and removes any white space changes, which should keep the patch more
on topic and shorter for review.
- Original Message -
From: "Andrew Beekhof"
To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager"
Sent: Friday, April 29
Version 2. I updated to apply cleanly on top of the previous patch and provided
the following commit message:
Medium: stonith: Allow clients to avoid use of Glib mainloop.
Allow an application to avoid use of the Glib mainloop by polling
on the asyncronous file descriptor provided in the connec
On 2011-04-29 09:23, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 9:16 AM, wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Using the MailTo resource I want to generate a more specific message, like
>> this: Having 2 resources running on a node like MailTo and Dummy (besides
>> some other resources) . Adding a or
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Florian Haas wrote:
> On 2011-04-27 20:55, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
>> On 2011-04-26T23:34:16, Yan Gao wrote:
>>> And the cibs between different sites would still be synchronized?
>>
>> The idea is that there would be - perhaps as part of the CTR daemon - a
>> pr
Hi,
This is the next DRBD MC release 0.9.2. DRBD MC is DRBD, Pacemaker and
cluster virtual manager GUI.
In this release the parts of the GUI that enable to setup a live VM
migration were enhanced and fixed. The virtual manager works now in a
cluster as promised.
Another nice feature, that someon
With such a long email, assume agreement for anything I don't
explicitly complain about :-)
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 8:55 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2011-04-26T23:34:16, Yan Gao wrote:
>
> Hi Yan,
>
> thanks for the good questions, let's get a discussion started!
>
>> >IntroductioN: At LP
On 2011-04-29 09:26, Florian Haas wrote:
> All of that being said, I do notice that the conntrackd RA incorrectly
> advertises its monitor operations,
Fixed:
https://github.com/ClusterLabs/resource-agents/commit/9da916f48434edfe2b5e904f87ba35a4d1ba30dc
> and the man pages we generate could
> use
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Holger Teutsch wrote:
> Hi Dejan,
>
> On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 17:58 +0200, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
>> Hi Holger,
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 04:31:33PM +0200, Holger Teutsch wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 20:50 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> > > why?
>> > >
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 3:33 PM, wrote:
>
> Hi List,
> http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
>
> my configuration consists of a 2 node cluster running a haproxy/apache
> environment. The active apache/haproxy config is bound to a pair of virtual
> addresses
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 9:23 AM, wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> given a 2 node cluster running on vmware VMs on rhel6. We have two interfaces
> eth0 and eth1. Cluster (multicast) communication is delegated to eth1 (due to
> special multicast rules within our data center). So now if I would bring down
The author in question is Sebastian Koch
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Thomas wrote:
> Michael Schwartzkopff writes:
>> > > What about solving the unterlying problem that monitoring does not
>> > > geenrate any failures any more?
>> >
>> > So I understand your recommendation would be the solu
On 2011-04-28 23:48, CeR wrote:
> When I added the resources:
>
> root@fw1:~# crm configure primitive slave_conntrackd heartbeat:conntrackd \
> op monitor depth="0" timeout="20" interval="20" role="Slave"
This is not how you're supposed to configure mas
Hi all,
given a 2 node cluster running on vmware VMs on rhel6. We have two interfaces
eth0 and eth1. Cluster (multicast) communication is delegated to eth1 (due to
special multicast rules within our data center). So now if I would bring down
eth1 I will run in a split brain situation. What is
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 9:16 AM, wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Using the MailTo resource I want to generate a more specific message, like
> this: Having 2 resources running on a node like MailTo and Dummy (besides
> some other resources) . Adding a order rule like "order Dummy-before-Notify
> inf: Du
Again, "glib prune mainloop stuff" just isn't good enough as a commit message.
You've gone to the effort to describe the reason for the patch below,
thats the sort of stuff that should go in the commit message.
The patch itself is good though.
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Marcus Barrow wrote
Hi all,
Using the MailTo resource I want to generate a more specific message, like
this: Having 2 resources running on a node like MailTo and Dummy (besides some
other resources) . Adding a order rule like "order Dummy-before-Notify inf:
Dummy MailTo". So if the Dummy resource is started it wi
There are some spurious whitespace changes that need to be removed and
"more glib prune from API" isn't really acceptable as the commit
message.
: : something descriptive
In this case...
Medium: stonith: Remove Glib data types from the API arguments
This is the first step towards purging Glib
17 matches
Mail list logo
