Hi,
I have read draft-ietf-opsawg-pcaplinktype-05 and would like to point
out a few nits with suggestions for improvements:
* Section 3.2, item "Reference":
The description seems somewhow mangled, perhaps replace it with:
"Indicates a document as authoritative reference for the LinkType,
The WG LC on this draft has concluded. There were several nit/typo comments
raised and substantial concern about the collection of link type descriptions.
Given that, I’d like to get some feedback from the authors as to how they want
to proceed before moving this on for publication. Both the
