Hi,
I have read draft-ietf-opsawg-pcaplinktype-05 and would like to point
out a few nits with suggestions for improvements:
* Section 3.2, item "Reference":
The description seems somewhow mangled, perhaps replace it with:
"Indicates a document as authoritative reference for the LinkType,
or a requester reference."
* Section 3.2.2, first paragraph, s/documented/document/:
OLD:
It is noted that many
enterprise web sites do not maintain URLs over a long period of time,
and a documented in a "wp-uploaded" section is highly likely to
disappear.
NEW:
It is noted that many
enterprise web sites do not maintain URLs over a long period of time,
and a document in a "wp-uploaded" section is highly likely to
disappear.
* Section 3.2.2, second paragraph, s/needs to be/need to be/:
OLD:
then the octets
between the beginning of the link type and the IP header needs to be
very clearly specified in that document.
NEW:
then the octets
between the beginning of the link type and the IP header need to be
very clearly specified in that document.
* Section 3.2.2, fourth paragraph,
s/Linktypes may be allocated /Linktype allocations/:
OLD:
Linktypes may be allocated for specifications not publically
available may be made within the First-Come/First-Served area.
NEW:
Linktype allocations for specifications not publically
available may be made within the First-Come/First-Served area.
Best regards,
Erik
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list -- opsawg@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to opsawg-le...@ietf.org
