Hi Michael,
Thank you for fixing this.
FWIW, I created a PR that you can see at:
https://github.com/IETF-OPSAWG-WG/draft-ietf-opsawg-pcap/pull/154/files. Please
grab whatever you think useful out there.
I think that it would be useful to have a new column to easily tag the status
of an assign
Hi Eliot,
Thank you for addressing these. Please find some additional comments:
1. I created a PR for some minor points:
https://github.com/elear/opsawg-ol/pull/3/files: TLP + follow the guidance for
the list names.
2. I know that you don’t use the security template in 8520, but given that you
Hi Med,
Thanks. The impetus for this work is that some think that MUD files
need a license statement. As such, the augment should be sufficient in
this case; but I will raise the question in netmod. As to this:
On 06.05.2024 11:16, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote:
2. I know that you do
Hi Joel,
Thank you for the review.
You got it right. Please see more context at [1].
I updated the text to address your review. Please check the diff [1] and let
me know if any further change is needed. Thanks.
Cheers,
Med
[1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/g-cXqAHzazaA_gOf7Wo
{please ignore unicast message I sent thirty seconds ago}
mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote:
> I think that it would be useful to have a new column to easily tag the
> status of an assignment. Deprecated ones can be marked as such using
> that new column, instead of having this in th
Hi Robert,
Thanks for the review.
The changes made to take into account your comment can be seen at:
https://author-tools.ietf.org/api/iddiff?url_1=https://boucadair.github.io/udp-ipfix/draft-ietf-opsawg-tsvwg-udp-ipfix.txt&url_2=https://boucadair.github.io/udp-ipfix/Robert-Sparks-Review/draft-
Hi Watson,
Thank you for the review.
The review will be ACKed in the next iteration:
https://github.com/boucadair/udp-ipfix/pull/5/commits/d1ea84a92a972e4ed00f408fd70362c2101b26a9
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Watson Ladd via Datatracker
> Envoyé : dimanche 5 mai 2024 23:2
Hi Donald,
Thanks for the review.
All good suggestions. I went with all of the suggestions, except the refs:
https://author-tools.ietf.org/api/iddiff?url_1=https://boucadair.github.io/simple-ipfix-fixes/draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-fixes.txt&url_2=https://boucadair.github.io/simple-ipfix-fixes/Donald
Re-,
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Michael Richardson
> Envoyé : lundi 6 mai 2024 12:18
> À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET ;
> opsawg@ietf.org
> Objet : Re: [OPSAWG] advancing PCAP drafts
>
>
> {please ignore unicast message I sent thirty seconds ago}
>
Thank you. Those edits do the job nicely.
Joel
On 5/6/2024 5:49 AM, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote:
Hi Joel,
Thank you for the review.
You got it right. Please see more context at [1].
I updated the text to address your review. Please check the diff [1] and let
me know if any further
OK, thanks for the quick response and update.
Thanks,
Donald
===
Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA
d3e...@gmail.com
On Mon, May 6, 2024 at 8:16 AM wrote:
>
> Hi Donald,
>
>
>
> Thanks for the review.
>
>
>
>
mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote:
>> okay, I couldn't quite understand this from the diff, but in
>> principal I have no problem with that.
> [Med] Actually, I didn't make that change in the PR as I wanted to
> discuss it first here. As you are Ok with it, so please update the
12 matches
Mail list logo
