that new
revision is pushed, I’ll review it as shepherd.
Joe
From: Guy Harris
Date: Thursday, April 10, 2025 at 14:36
To: Joe Clarke (jclarke)
Cc: opsawg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG]Re: WG LC: Link-Layer Types for PCAP and PCAPNG Capture
File Formats
On Apr 10, 2025, at 8:57 AM, Joe Clarke
On Apr 10, 2025, at 8:57 AM, Joe Clarke (jclarke)
wrote:
> As a contributor. I have read this document, and I appreciate the formatting
> changes the authors have made. I think it is ready for publication.
As the person listed as editor, I think that the version at
https://datatrac
As a contributor. I have read this document, and I appreciate the formatting
changes the authors have made. I think it is ready for publication.
As a chair, I assume that mcr and Guy would be willing to act as initial
designated experts on this?
I have assigned myself the shepherd role, and I
On Apr 1, 2025, at 12:38 PM, Guy Harris wrote:
> *I* claim no IPR on the document.
Document*s*, plural. (All of them, Katie!) I've better things to do with my
time than care about having any copyright myself or taking out any patents on
this.
___
O
On Aug 27, 2024, at 8:48 AM, Joe Clarke (jclarke)
wrote:
> The WG LC on this draft has concluded. There were several nit/typo comments
> raised and substantial concern about the collection of link type
> descriptions. Given that, I’d like to get some feedback from the authors as
> to how th
The WG LC on this draft has concluded. There were several nit/typo comments
raised and substantial concern about the collection of link type descriptions.
Given that, I’d like to get some feedback from the authors as to how they want
to proceed before moving this on for publication. Both the
On Aug 12, 2024, at 1:29 PM, Joe Clarke (jclarke)
wrote:
> For now, please review this document and provide all feedback on the list.
There are some link-layer types whose description is either:
1) insufficiently detailed, e.g. LINKTYPE_WIHART, which has a description on
the source site for
