Remember that in Europe we set the clocks back an hour this past
weekend, but in the USA they havent yet.
Officially, this is when the meeting is in UTC time:
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?hour=14&min=0&sec=0
That would be at 15:00 in Europe, at 07:00 in California, an
Here are the minutes of meeting from today's meeting:
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-sfc/2016/opnfv-sfc.2016-11-02-14.00.html
Regards,
Brady
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.o
In case you havent seen it, here is the OPNFV SFC Danube release plan:
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/sfc/OPNFV+SFC+Danube+Release+Plan
Here is a useful link with all of the OPNFV Danube release plans:
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/SWREL/Summary+of+Project+Release+Plans+for+Danube
Regards,
Justin,Compass.
I added the OPNFV SFC tech discuss list to share this with the rest of
the community.
Currently we have the following scenarios for SFC:
* os-odl_l2-sfc-ha
* os-odl_l2-sfc-noha
And we will be creating this new scenario to work with the FD.io VPP
virtual switch:
* os-o
Today, I would like to discuss the following
* Changes to functest that affected SFC
* Moving functest SFC code into the OPNFV SFC git repo
* Boron SR1 and Colorado 3.0
Now that USA has also done the daylight savings time change, the meeting
time will be back to normal.
Regards,
Brady
Here are the Minutes of meeting from today's meeting:
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-sfc/2016/opnfv-sfc.2016-11-09-15.05.html
Regards,
Brady
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.o
Thanks to Ferenc for looking up the actual scenario names.
Brady
Forwarded Message
Subject:sfc fd.io/vpp scenarios
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2016 16:59:32 +0100
From: Ferenc Cserepkei
To: Brady Allen Johnson
Hello Brady,
here they are: https://wiki.opnfv.org
The functest code has been moved from the functest git repo to the SFC
repo, as can be seen in this patch [0].
A big thanks to George Paraskevopoulos for doing this.
Regards,
Brady
[0] https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/24233
___
opnfv-tech-discuss
Hello,
Lets talk about the following today:
1 - Test running in master, although there is an external problem which
made it fail once
2 - Tests moved to sfc repo
3 - Status of the merge to Colorado stable
4 - Tacker fix committed for tackerclient version
5 - Performance issues
6 - Status of F
Here [0] are the minutes from todays meeting.
Regards,
Brady
[0]
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-sfc/2016/opnfv-sfc.2016-11-16-14.59.html
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opn
We've made great progress with the end-to-end SFC testing in OPNFV SFC.
Success on the last 4 runs of the SFC scenario in Colorado branch!!
https://build.opnfv.org/ci/view/functest/job/functest-fuel-baremetal-daily-colorado/646/
https://build.opnfv.org/ci/view/functest/job/functest-fuel
Agenda for today's meeting:
* Now that OPNFV SFC testing is working great [0], lets start adding
more complex test cases
o multiple computes
o multiple SFs
o symmetric chains
o etc
* Changing the directory structure of our tests
* VPP scenario updates
* Above and beyo
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-sfc/2016/opnfv-sfc.2016-11-23-15.00.html
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
Lets talk about the following today:
* Status and possible workarounds for OVS problems with multiple VXLAN
ports [0]
* Status of testing refactoring
* Performance profiling (presentation by George)
* SFC/VPP integration task roadmap
Regards,
Brady
[0]
https://lists.opendaylight.org/p
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-sfc/2016/opnfv-sfc.2016-11-30-15.03.html
Brady
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
Im out of the office this week on a business trip, so lets cancel the weekly
meeting.
Regards,
Brady
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
Here's what we will cover in today's meeting:
* Testing different topologies
o Yesterday Manuel reported this problem [0]
o Lets discuss and make sure we plan to cover topologies that
could cause us problems
* Stateful character of the tests
o We should probably tear eve
Here are the meeting minutes for today's meeting:
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-sfc/2016/opnfv-sfc.2016-12-14-15.00.html
Brady
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailm
I wont be able to host the OPNFV SFC meeting today, December 21. And due
to the holiday schedule, I'll go ahead and cancel the meeting next week
on December 28.
I hope everybody has a great holiday season.
Talk to you next year, for the next meeting on January 4, 2017.
Best Regards,
Brady
Have you applied this workaround, section 5.8?
http://artifacts.opnfv.org/sfc/colorado/docs/design/index.html
If Im not mistaken, the Fuel and Apex SFC scenarios should do this. The
OVS flows are written by ODL.
Regards,
Brady
On 21/12/16 15:08, Srikanth Lingala wrote:
Hi,
I deployed OS
Srikanth,
I briefly analyzed the flows and have seen the following:
table=11, cookie=0x1110010002380255 is the Netvirt classifier flow, and
there are no packet matches there, meaning that the packets are not
getting to the classifier.
Since no flows get to the classifier, then no flows get t
Hello Ehsan,
I included the OPNFV SFC email list so that others that may have similar
questions to yours can benefit from this information.
A much better document to use for OPNFV SFC is the Colorado design
document [0].
To answer your first question: Yes there should be an IP for the SFs
I didnt send out an agenda for this week's meeting, and as a result
there was much less attendance. Im still getting back on track after the
holidays, and did have much going on anyways.
The attendees were the following:
* Paraskevopoulos Georgios
* Veena Lingadahalli
* Juan Vidal
Geo
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-sfc/2017/opnfv-sfc.2017-02-01-15.00.html
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
Srikanth,
The reason wget works and doesnt send packets to the VM is because your
classification rule (pasted below) matches on srcPort=2000 and
dstPort=80, but you dont specify the srcPort with wget, so the packets
dont match classification, and subsequently dont get sent to SFC (hence
they
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-sfc/2017/opnfv-sfc.2017-02-08-15.03.html
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
ttributes? Is that
possible with single classifier?
Regards,
Srikanth.
*From:*sfc-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org
[mailto:sfc-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org] *On Behalf Of
*Srikanth Lingala
*Sent:* Wednesday, February 08, 2017 11:30 PM
*To:* Sam Hague ; Brady Allen Johnson
*Cc:
Just a reminder that Milestone 6 is due next week, Friday February 17.
Here is what we need completed:
_
_
_Test Case Implementation_
As you recall, test cases were documented in the test case database
as of Milestone 2 last fall. For milestone 6, those test cases must
be implement
Lets cover the following today:
* Preparations for MS6 this Friday
* Documentation changes
* Test cases implemented
* Review the current backlog
* Nice-To-Have improvements as suggested by Juan Vidal
* https://jira.opnfv.org/browse/SFC-76
* Updates on VPP and
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-sfc/2017/opnfv-sfc.2017-02-15-14.59.html
Brady
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
David et al,
Here is the status of MS6 for the SFC project:
Here are the new test cases in Danube:
* Symmetric service chains: https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/28523
* Service chains in multiple topologies:
https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/28921
And here are the Gerrit patches for the
The subject says it all :)
Brady
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
Here's the agenda for today's weekly meeting:
* CI stability
* symmetric_chain testcase problems, and way forward
* Milestone 7 preparations
* Current tasks/status
* Upcoming OPNFV PlugTest in Paris
Brady
___
opnfv-tech-discuss ma
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-sfc/2017/opnfv-sfc.2017-03-01-14.59.html
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
Since this is more of an issue with OPNFV SFC than ODL SFC, I will add that
mail list.
Regards,
Brady
-Original Message-
From: Srikanth Lingala
mailto:srikanth%20lingala%20%3csrikanth.ling...@nxp.com%3e>>
To: sfc-...@lists.opendaylight.org
mailto:%22sfc-...@lists.opendaylight.org%22%
ped by the VXLAN port.
Can you do a tcpdump on the first compute host to see if you are experiencing
the same problem?
I believe this was fixed, but I cant remember where the solution is. Hopefully
Yi Yang can provide details about this.
Regards,
Brady
-Original Message-----
From: Brady All
h%20lingala%20%3csrikanth.ling...@nxp.com%3e>>,
Brady Allen Johnson
mailto:brady%20allen%20johnson%20%3cbrady.allen.john...@ericsson.com%3e>>,
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
mailto:%22opnfv-tech-disc...@lists.opnfv.org%22%20%3copnfv-tech-disc...@lists.opnfv.org%3e>>,
s
Agenda:
* Solutions found for CI issues (Manuel)
* Tacker authorization issue solved (George)
* Status of the test cases being developed - need to be completed by this
Friday
* Preparations for MS7 this Friday (March 10)
Regards,
Brady
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-sfc/2017/opnfv-sfc.2017-03-08-14.58.html
Brady
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
I plan to create the stable/danube branch for OPNFV SFC today at 17:30 GMT+1.
This is the final piece missing for us to complete Danube MS7.
If anyone has any objections with that, please let me know ASAP.
Regards,
Brady
___
opnfv-tech-discuss maili
Correction: Aric Gardner, the OPNFV sys admin, will create the branches for us
today.
Regards,
Brady
-Original Message-
From: Brady Allen Johnson
mailto:brady%20allen%20johnson%20%3cbrady.allen.john...@ericsson.com%3e>>
To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
mailto:%22opnfv-tec
Aric,
Thanks for the info.
Im assuming SFC is considered a "participating project". If not, can you still
branch our project please?
We're ready to go for MS7 and for the branching, so whenever you're ready,
branch away from the latest commit :)
Thanks,
Brady
-Original Message-
Fr
Trinath,
The OPNFV SFC project is based on OpenDaylight SFC only.
I know there is some OpenContrail support in OPNFV, but there is no SFC support
from OpenContrail available in OPNFV.
Regards,
Brady
-Original Message-
From: Trinath Somanchi
mailto:trinath%20somanchi%20%3ctrinath.som
from OpenContrail,
nor was there ever any interest publicly expressed from the OpenContrail
community.
Brady
-Original Message-
From: Trinath Somanchi
mailto:trinath%20somanchi%20%3ctrinath.soman...@nxp.com%3e>>
To: Brady Allen Johnson
mailto:brady%20allen%20john
Anton,
The SFC101 and 102 demos are outdated and no longer supported. Its best to look
at either the SFC103 or 104 demos. The sfc-agent is still used in SFC103, but
we will soon stop supporting it.
The SFC103 demo is a great way to run and execute SFC in a single VM. If you
want to create SFs
have another VNF Manager, then you'll need to handle the VMs
by hand, which is possible, but can be very tedious.
Regards,
Brady
-Original Message-
From: "Chivkunov, Anton"
mailto:%22Chivkunov,%20anton%22%20%3cachiv...@mera.ru%3e>>
To: Brady Allen Johnson
mailto:brady
al Message-
From: Babu Kothandaraman
mailto:babu%20kothandaraman%20%3cbabu.kothandara...@pfsw.com%3e>>
To: Brady Allen Johnson
mailto:brady%20allen%20johnson%20%3cbrady.allen.john...@ericsson.com%3e>>,
Michail Polenchuk
mailto:michail%20polenchuk%20%3cmpolenc...@mirantis.com%3e>&
Let's discuss the following in today's meeting:
* ODL cleanup after deletion
* Classifier location
* Status of Tacker pull request
* AOB
Regards,
Brady
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://l
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-sfc/2017/opnfv-sfc.2017-03-15-15.04.html
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
* Status of Danube release as discussed yesterday in the TSC and Release
meetings
* Latest fixes made by the team to stabilize the release
* Status of Fuel in CI
* Upcoming Milestones
* Status of ODL Boron SR3 testing and plans to use this distro.
* Any other business.
Re
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-sfc/2017/opnfv-sfc.2017-03-22-15.01.html
Brady
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
David,
I asked in an email previous to this the following questions:
Considering the Danube 1.0 release will be delayed by at least 1 week, what is
the status of Milestones 9 and 10?
Milestone 9 is due today, March 22 and requires us to have all the JIRAs closed
and/or assigned to subsequent
Brandon,
Thanks for that, that's very helpful!
Regards,
Brady
-Original Message-
From: Brandon Wick
mailto:brandon%20wick%20%3cbw...@linuxfoundation.org%3e>>
To: opnfv-tech-dis.
mailto:%22opnfv-tech-dis.%22%20%3copnfv-tech-disc...@lists.opnfv.org%3e>>
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] OP
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-sfc/2017/opnfv-sfc.2017-03-29-14.03.html
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
We're finished with Danube 1.0 and I just tagged the git repo as such.
Congratulations and a big thanks to everybody for all the hard work that made
this release a success for SFC! :)
Here's the tag:
$ git tag -v danube.1.0
object 54ac61161108b037c1ccb3dca9cd2640f46b78b9
type commit
tag da
FYI
Brady
Forwarded Message
From: Brady Allen Johnson
mailto:brady%20allen%20johnson%20%3cbrady.allen.john...@ericsson.com%3e>>
To: opnfv-...@lists.opnfv.org
mailto:%22opnfv-...@lists.opnfv.org%22%20%3copnfv-...@lists.opnfv.org%3e>>
Subject: [opnfv-tsc] [releas
Today, we'll discuss the following:
* OPNFV SFC Euphrates features
* Proposed feature: Test ODL Carbon. This will be more complex than it
sounds since it will be with the new netvirt, Logical SFF, and everything
integrated with Genius
* Proposed feature: Bifrost, Openstack Ansible
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-sfc/2017/opnfv-sfc.2017-04-19-14.06.html
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
Srikanth,
Its also possible to make the vxlan_tool.py be a firewall by blocking certain
TCP ports. We even setup a demo once using this tool to read any of the NSH
C1-C4 and use them accordingly. In that specific demo we had the classifier put
the symmetric chain id in C3 and when the vxlan_to
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-sfc/2017/opnfv-sfc.2017-04-26-14.01.html
Brady
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
We have already discussed the features the current members would like to see in
OPNFV SFC Euphrates, as can be seen here [0] and here [1].
We passed MS1 yesterday, May 2, but I want to close on this in today's meeting.
If anyone else has any other features they would like to see in Euphrates,
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-sfc/2017/opnfv-sfc.2017-05-03-13.58.html
Brady
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
Hello,
I will be traveling to the OpenStack Boston Summit and wont be able to host the
meeting this week, so lets cancel it.
Regards,
Brady
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listin
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-sfc/2017/opnfv-sfc.2017-05-17-13.58.html
Brady
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-sfc/2017/opnfv-sfc.2017-06-07-13.59.html
Brady
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
Lets cancel the meeting this week since most people are at the summit.
Regards,
Brady
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
Several people are on vacation this week, and I dont have anything special to
cover this week, so lets cancel the meeting.
Regards,
Brady
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-sfc/2017/opnfv-sfc.2017-06-28-14.00.html
Brady
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
We finally have a working ODL Boron distro for testing with the OVS
2.5.90 NSH Yi Yang patch in OPNFV.
You can get the distro here:
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B20dtomeEJsVc0tVVUdweG1IOG8
I have set the version in the tarball name to 0.5.9, but when untarred,
you'll see that the cr
*Brady
Allen Johnson
*Sent:* Wednesday, July 27, 2016 8:45 PM
*To:* sfc-...@lists.opendaylight.org; OPNFV Tech
*Subject:* [sfc-dev] [SFC] A working ODL Boron distro (0.5.9) for
testing with OVS 2.5.90 NSH
We finally have a working ODL Boron distro for testing with the OVS
2.5.90 NSH Yi Yang
Rozet
Red Hat SDN Team
- Original Message -
From: "Ricardo Noriega De Soto"
To: "Tim Rozet"
Cc: "Brady Allen Johnson" , "sfc-dev"
, "OPNFV Tech"
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2016 12:57:40 PM
Subject: Re: [sfc-dev] [opnfv-tech-discuss] [S
Im on vacation this week, so Im canceling the meeting.
Regards,
Brady
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
Interesting news:
http://www.marketwired.com/press-release/open-vswitch-joins-linux-foundation-open-networking-ecosystem-2148999.htm
Brady
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinf
can't yet support Eth+NSH, so VxLAN workaround is necessary, Brady
and other guys from Ericsson have a plan to support Eth+NSH in SFC.
-----Original Message-
From: Tim Rozet [mailto:tro...@redhat.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 5:39 AM
To: Manuel Buil ; Yang, Yi Y ; Sam
Hague
In yesterday's weekly meeting, I had an action point to provide a link
to the ODL Boron RC2 distro so that Tim could persist it in the OPNFV
artifacts storage.
Here's the link to the distro and MD5:
https://nexus.opendaylight.org/content/repositories/autorelease-1455/org/opendaylight/integra
Tim,
Per my action point in yesterday's OPNFV SFC meeting, here is an example
SFP specifying concrete SFs in the hops. In the attached config, you'll
notice its one /symmetric/ service chain, with one SFF, and 2 SFs of the
same type.
{
"service-function-paths": {
"service
David,
One thing to keep in mind, there are at least 2 major events that could
affect the "Planning Complete" and "Scenarios Defined" milestones, which
are the ODL summit, the week of September 25th and the OpenStack summit
in Barcelona, the week of October 25th.
Regards,
Brady
On 09/09/1
Thomas,
For the Colorado release, SFC is using the NSH Intel patches directly
from the Yi Yang github repo.
https://github.com/yyang13/ovs_nsh_patches
Regards,
Brady
On 09/09/16 17:37, Thomas F Herbert wrote:
Brady,
Is SFC using the RPMs created by ovsnfv or is SFC using the Intel
Hello,
I would like to nominate Manuel Buil as committer for the OPNFV SFC project.
Since OPNFV isnt really about commits, I wont bother listing his
commits, although he has done alot of them for SFC in Fuel, Yardstick,
ODL SFC, and Functest.
Manuel has been very active this release, and ha
Hello,
Lets cover the following in today's weekly meeting:
* Scope for Colorado 2.0
o what's the status of the Tacker plug-in for FUEL? Should we
spend time registering the service in the proxy or better wait
for the plug-in?
* Help debugging Netvirt issue
o OPNFV SFC
Here are the minutes of meeting from today's meeting:
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-sfc/2016/opnfv-sfc.2016-09-21-14.02.html
Regards,
Brady
On 21/09/16 12:39, Brady Allen Johnson wrote:
Hello,
Lets cover the following in today's weekly meeting:
*
Chris,
I understood that we had until Thursday to do the labeling.
I have one minor release notes and scenario doc patch pending that
should be merged shortly. Once its merged, I'll do the label.
Regards,
Brady
On 21/09/16 19:25, David McBride wrote:
Note that Aric just added some troubles
, reused 0 (delta 0)
remote:
remote: Processing changes: refs: 1, done
To ssh://ebrj...@gerrit.opnfv.org:29418/sfc
* [new tag] colorado.1.0 -> colorado.1.0
Regards,
Brady
On 21/09/16 20:04, Brady Allen Johnson wrote:
Chris,
I understood that we had until Thursday to do the
Thanks for your votes everybody!
With my +1 vote, there were 6 votes cast all together: all of them being
+1, which makes it more than unanimous.
Congratulations Manuel.
I'll formalize this with the TSC.
Regards,
Brady
On 22/09/16 20:49, Vishal Murgai (vmurgai) wrote:
+1
*From:*opnfv-
Hello TSC,
This is to inform you that the SFC project intends to participate in the
OPNFV Danube release.
Regards,
Brady
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-disc
Hello,
Today's agenda:
* Plans for Colorado 2.0 (bug fixes, etc)
o Improve HA support
* Planned features for Danube release
o GBP classifier
o Use FastDataStacks to get fd.io support
o Installation support with JOID
Please feel free to add more topics.
Regards,
Brady
_
In this weeks' meeting, Frank Brockners will present the OPNFV Fast Data
Stacks project with the intention of helping us integrate Fast Data
Stacks with OPNFV SFC.
The main goal of the OPNFV Fast Data Stacks project is to integrate
OpenStack with the FD.io VPP virtual switch. FD.io is an alt
Tom,
Thanks for all your help in the past.
I'll take care of the details of this.
Regards,
Brady
On 11/10/16 13:52, Tom Nadeau wrote:
Please remove me as a committer on the SFC project.
Thanks,
--Tom
___
opnfv-tech-disc
Here are the IRC minutes of meeting:
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-sfc/2016/opnfv-sfc.2016-10-12-13.53.html
Regards,
Brady
On 11/10/16 11:36, Brady Allen Johnson wrote:
In this weeks' meeting, Frank Brockners will present the OPNFV Fast
Data Stacks project wit
89 matches
Mail list logo
