, 2017 8:28 PM
To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-tsc] Continuing the project graduation
discussions
I agree. According to the definitions, most of the projects should be in
Integration Review by now. If we keep the Graduation Review and Termination
...@lists.opnfv.org
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] *On Behalf Of
*SULLIVAN, BRYAN L
*Sent:* Tuesday, March 07, 2017 4:52 AM
*To:* Raymond Paik; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org;
opnfv-...@lists.opnfv.org
*Subject:* Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-tsc] Continuing the project
-discuss] [opnfv-tsc] Continuing the project graduation
discussions
I added my comments to that page:
I think we need to revisit the
<https://www.opnfv.org/software/technical-project-governance/project-lifecycle>
https://www.opnfv.org/software/technical-project-governance/project-lif
I added my comments to that page:
I think we need to revisit the
https://www.opnfv.org/software/technical-project-governance/project-lifecycle
expectations 2.5 years into OPNFV. IMO, in a rapidly evolving industry,
projects will come and go, morph and merge, both in OPNFV and upstream. In
fact,
