[opnfv-tech-discuss] [KVM] Weekly meeting for KVM enhancements for NFV - Agenda 3/16/2017

Meeting logistics - https://wiki.opnfv.org/nfv-kvm Weekly on Thursday at 2330 UTC (4:30PM PDT) Goto Meeting Link Agenda: 1) Milestone check 2) Scenario Status 3)

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]weekly dovetail meeting

BEGIN:VCALENDAR METHOD:REQUEST PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 VERSION:2.0 BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:China Standard Time BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:16010101T00 TZOFFSETFROM:+0800 TZOFFSETTO:+0800 END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT DTSTART:16010101T00 TZOFFSETFROM:+0800 TZOFFSETTO:+0800 END:DAYLIGHT E

[opnfv-tech-discuss] reply: [dovetail] Dovetail weekly meeting agenda

Thanks Bin. Thanks for your suggestion. I will change the time aback to the 6am PDT, which is now UTC 13:00 / 21:00 in China. In this time slot, there is no conflict for 1.5 hours. If needed, we can change in future. I will update the calendar. Any comments? Best regards hongbo 发件人: HU, B

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [yardstick] user-data parameter?

There are two modes for Heat context, user-defined templates or generated templates. With user-defined templates, you can add any Heat option you like. Example for user_data https://git.opnfv.org/yardstick/tree/yardstick/vTC/apexlake/heat_templates/vTC.yaml#n79. If you are doing fancy stuff

[opnfv-tech-discuss] VNF to demonstrate VNF high availability across VIM

Hello, In multisite, we have one use cases ever discussed: a VNF (telecom application) should, be able to realize high availability deployment across OpenStack instances. For more detail of such an use cases, you can refer to https://git.opnfv.org/multisite/tree/docs/requirements/VNF_high_avail

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Dovetail weekly meeting agenda

IPv6 has been following the convention and rule. So we have been using, and will continue to use the *even* hour bridge, which is tech-projec...@opnfv.org. Thanks Bin From: Tianhongbo [mailto:hongbo.tianhon...@huawei.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2017 5:59 PM

[opnfv-tech-discuss] 答复: [dovetail] Dovetail weekly meeting agenda

Hi: Thanks for your suggestion. There are two accounts for the gotomeeting. That means it can support two meeting simultaneously . For 7am. ARM are using the tech-proje...@opnfv.org, dovetail are using the tech-projec...@opnfv.org

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Dovetail weekly meeting agenda

I suggest that you keep the 6am PDT, which is now UTC 13:00 / 21:00 in China. Otherwise, you will conflict with ARM Band (7am PDT) or IPv6 (8am PDT) no matter you use *odd* hour bridge or *even* hour bridge. Thanks Bin From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Dovetail weekly meeting agenda

Here is a list of topics I propose we try to cover this Friday: 1) Test case requirement update (Dave Neary) – 20 min 2) Danube plan review – agreement on TSC report on 3/21 (Wenjing) – 20 min 3) Functest/yardstick/testWG dependencies update: result DB, refstack, interface, htt

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [VSPERF] Colorado 3.0 doc issue for vswitchperf

Looks like it worked http://artifacts.opnfv.org/opnfvdocs/colorado/3.0/docs/documentation/index.html From: Cooper, Trevor Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2017 11:48 AM To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [VSPERF] Colorado 3.0 doc issue for vswitchperf I added the Col

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [VSPERF] Colorado 3.0 doc issue for vswitchperf

I added the Colorado 3.0 label to stable head of Colorado branch ... https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/gitweb?p=vswitchperf.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/stable/colorado I am not sure if the Colorado docs will be automatically rebuilt ... is there still an active job for that? http://artifacts.opnf

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [ovn4nfv] 2017 OPNFV Summit CFP Now Open

Hi All, Deadline for OPNFV Summit CFP is March 27th. Please try to submit your proposals before that. If required we can discuss on IRC channel - #opnfv-ovn4nfv Thanks, Vikram > Begin forwarded message: > > From: Brandon Wick > Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] 2017 OPNFV Summit CFP Now Open >

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [SFC] Weekly meeting minutes, March 15

http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-sfc/2017/opnfv-sfc.2017-03-15-15.04.html ___ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [SFC] Weekly meeting agenda

Let's discuss the following in today's meeting: * ODL cleanup after deletion * Classifier location * Status of Tacker pull request * AOB Regards, Brady ___ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://l

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [netready] Meeting agenda March 15

Hi all, This is the agenda for today's meeting: * Gluon integration * Gluon lab setup * Requirements document update * AOB Best regards Georg ___ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org htt

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [Compass4NFV] weekly meeting of Mar.16

Hi team, *Agenda of Mar.16 2017* - Danube release Status - Open-O scenario status - ONOS scenario status - OPNFV Summit Demo Discuss - E release - Requirements - K8s CI verification - Aob Weekly on Thursday at 0900 UTC IRC channel: #opnfv-compass4nfv

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [fuel][plugins][odl] SFC agent for SFs/SFFs/Classifiers creation

Hello Babu, Yes, that is the right place. Some sub-tests are still failing though. The deadline to have them working in next Friday 24th of March. However, try to launch them because everything should be working (except you will get a message that some sub-tests fail). Regards, Manuel On 03

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Canceled: Pharos Bi-Weekly Meeting

BEGIN:VCALENDAR METHOD:CANCEL PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 VERSION:2.0 BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:Pacific Standard Time BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:16010101T02 TZOFFSETFROM:-0700 TZOFFSETTO:-0800 RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=1SU;BYMONTH=11 END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT DTSTART:16010101T02

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [yardstick] user-data parameter?

Hi, Is there a way in yardstick to pass the user-data information to the VM instance creation? I'm thinking something inline with what I can do via "nova boot --user-data user_data.file" Is there a way to pass either a file or instructions to Yardstick so that it can execute or configure somethi

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Cancelled: Pharos Bi-Weekly Meeting

BEGIN:VCALENDAR PRODID://Yahoo//Calendar//EN VERSION:2.0 METHOD:CANCEL BEGIN:VEVENT SUMMARY:Pharos Bi-Weekly Meeting DESCRIPTION:Pharos Bi-Weekly Meeting Details\n\n? Weekly on Wednesday at 6:00 PST or 14:00 UTC\n? GTM Link https://global.gotomeeting.com /join/819733085\n? Meet

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Cancelled: Pharos Bi-Weekly Meeting

BEGIN:VCALENDAR PRODID://Yahoo//Calendar//EN VERSION:2.0 METHOD:CANCEL BEGIN:VEVENT SUMMARY:Pharos Bi-Weekly Meeting DESCRIPTION:Pharos Bi-Weekly Meeting Details\n\n? Weekly on Wednesday at 6:00 PST or 14:00 UTC\n? GTM Link https://global.gotomeeting.com /join/819733085\n? Meet

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Cancelled: Pharos Bi-Weekly Meeting

BEGIN:VCALENDAR PRODID://Yahoo//Calendar//EN VERSION:2.0 METHOD:CANCEL BEGIN:VEVENT SUMMARY:Pharos Bi-Weekly Meeting DESCRIPTION:Pharos Bi-Weekly Meeting Details\n\n? Weekly on Wednesday at 6:00 PST or 14:00 UTC\n? GTM Link https://global.gotomeeting.com /join/819733085\n? Meet

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Pharos Bi-Weekly Meeting

BEGIN:VCALENDAR METHOD:REQUEST PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 VERSION:2.0 BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:Pacific Standard Time BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:16010101T02 TZOFFSETFROM:-0700 TZOFFSETTO:-0800 RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=1SU;BYMONTH=11 END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT DTSTART:16010101T02000

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] [release][danube] Intent-to-Release for Danube scenarios

And please don’t forget that scenarios intended for release need to be documented. Templates can be found under opnfvdocs/docs/templates/release/scenarios/scenario.name/ Scenario descriptions for Colorado can be found here

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [fuel][plugins][odl] SFC agent for SFs/SFFs/Classifiers creation

Hi Brady. Thank you for clarifications! Yes, I think I mixed up SFC 103 (which use vagrant) with https://github.com/trozet/sfc-random/blob/master/tacker_sfc_apex_walkthrough.txt, (which actually use Tacker). *During last several weeks I’ve studied a lot of different documents to find out instr

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [fuel][plugins][odl] SFC agent for SFs/SFFs/Classifiers creation

Hi Brady. Thank you for your feedback! Yes, I saw demos 103/104 as well and the reason why I interested in 101/102 instead is because they don’t use Tacker, but 103/104 use it. Our current installation based on instruction http://artifacts.opnfv.org/sfc/review/20587/installationprocedure-single

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [fuel][plugins][odl] SFC agent for SFs/SFFs/Classifiers creation

Hi Michael. If I didn’t cross the limit yet, I want to ask one more question about PlugIn ☺ On SFC main page (https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Service_Function_Chaining:Main) there are several Demos available. Demos 101&102 describe procedure of SFs/SFFs/Classifiers creation (https://drive.g

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [fuel][plugins][odl] SFC agent for SFs/SFFs/Classifiers creation

Brady, Thanks for your prompt reply, Sorry about that, we did actually deploy "os-odl_l2-sfc-noha" scenario. We were trying the func test in https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/sfc/Functest+SFC-ODL+-+Test+1 to test the deployment. But we are not sure if this is the right one to follow according to

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [fuel][plugins][odl] SFC agent for SFs/SFFs/Classifiers creation

Babu, I think it would be better to instead deploy OPNFV Colorado with the "os-odl_l2-sfc-noha" scenario. This document should help guide you through the installation: http://artifacts.opnfv.org/sfc/colorado/2.0/docs/installationprocedure/index.html Regards, Brady -Original Message

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]weekly dovetail meeting

BEGIN:VCALENDAR METHOD:REQUEST PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 VERSION:2.0 BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:China Standard Time BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:16010101T00 TZOFFSETFROM:+0800 TZOFFSETTO:+0800 END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT DTSTART:16010101T00 TZOFFSETFROM:+0800 TZOFFSETTO:+0800 END:DAYLIGHT E

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]weekly dovetail meeting

BEGIN:VCALENDAR METHOD:REQUEST PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 VERSION:2.0 BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:China Standard Time BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:16010101T00 TZOFFSETFROM:+0800 TZOFFSETTO:+0800 END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT DTSTART:16010101T00 TZOFFSETFROM:+0800 TZOFFSETTO:+0800 END:DAYLIGHT E

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [fuel][plugins][odl] SFC agent for SFs/SFFs/Classifiers creation

Hi Brady, I'm Babu from Packetfront software, we have installed OPNFV colorado for os-odl_l2-nofeature-noha scenario in virtual environment. We want to test SFC usecase using tacker as VNF manager like you mentioned in the mail above, could you please guide us to some documentation relating to

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [fuel][plugins][odl] SFC agent for SFs/SFFs/Classifiers creation

Anton, I should have been a bit more explicit in my previous email. The SFC103/104 demos are intended for a stand-alone, Non-OpenStack (hence no OPNFV needed) setup. Basically, they use vagrant to setup the necessary VMs. These demos do not use Tacker. In an OPNFV deployment, there needs to b

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [fuel][plugins][odl] SFC agent for SFs/SFFs/Classifiers creation

Anton, The SFC101 and 102 demos are outdated and no longer supported. Its best to look at either the SFC103 or 104 demos. The sfc-agent is still used in SFC103, but we will soon stop supporting it. The SFC103 demo is a great way to run and execute SFC in a single VM. If you want to create SFs

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [multisite]weekly meeting of Mar.16

Hello, team, Mar.16 2017 Agenda: * Functest issue. * E-Release discussion * OPNFV Beijing summit prepration * Open discussion IRC: http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=opnfv-meeting 8:00-9:00 UTC (During winter time, means CET 9:00 AM). Other topics are also welcome in the weekly meeting,

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [fuel][plugins][odl] SFC agent for SFs/SFFs/Classifiers creation

Hi Anton, + Manuel I believe Manuel has more experience with SFC than me. On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Chivkunov, Anton wrote: > Hi Michael. > > > > If I didn’t cross the limit yet, I want to ask one more question about > PlugIn J > > On SFC main page (https://wiki.opendaylight.org > /view