I think a proper ballot shall have 3 options:
- Candidate: Yes (+1)
- Candidate: No (-1)
- Candidate: Abstain (0)
This ensures procedural impartiality.
My understanding of current ballot is:
- Yes (1st) and No (2nd): means Yes
- No (1st) and Yes (
Another TSC member update below (from China Mobile)...
On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Raymond Paik
wrote:
> All,
>
> Just a quick reminder that the nomination period for the new TSC Chair
> closes on September 30th. I know many have been heads-down on Colorado
> 1.0, but please send me your
I don't think only including one option (i.e. "yes") in the ballot would be
appropriate, and I had similar (yes/no) ballots for other "uncontested"
elections in OPNFV.
I actually started the voting process a day early. Would people feel
better if I re-do the ballot with "Chris Price" and "Abstain
Hi,
can you help us understand what it would mean to vote “no”?
What will happen if most voters would vote “no” according to the Delaware
Corporation Law?
( I don’t think it will happen, but since you have allowed the option )
Thank you,
Uli
From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org
[
The openstack repos on github seems to be read only. To make contribution,
the developer will be guided to the gerrit system. See examples[1].
I would vote for a read-only mirror on Github.
[1] https://github.com/openstack/vitrage/pull/4
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 3:10 AM Raymond Paik
wrote:
> Lu
As far as I understand for OpenStack they just mirror it to github, any
code review and patch acceptance is still done in OpenStack gerrit.
OPNFV should have the mirror so that a broader ecosystem of software
developers could be built for NFV even if they could only browse the code
on github
On M
In the fashion I mentioned, it doesn't bypass the our governance.
One of the issues we always have to contend with is the DCO. It still requires
that the Dev that is ultimately bringing something into our ecosystem is doing
some level of due diligence. But this isn't a new risk.
Sent from my
Lots of good thoughts here.
One other thing is the legal aspect -- I know that developers don't
necessarily like lawyers and don't like legal constraints impinging on
their innovation and their work. On the other hand, as an open source
project that holds the communal IP for important work for our
Happy to share my opinions on this as well.
My most compelling motivator for this (and it should serve multiple interests)
is to be able to build based off an upstream patch and include it in a live
deployment in OPNFV. Reducing that turnaround time to minutes from pushing a
source patch an
Hi all,
I will be canceling this week's Domino Project meeting due to my business trip.
Regards,
Ulas Kozat
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
I can make a meeting on 10/6, but will be on my way back from Disney :)
So, previously, I had my Github location as my primary spot, which worked great
for trying to build up a community. It was easier than the current private
Gerrit arrangement. But it also has a downside. After discussion with
That's what I did for ONOSFW. If it sits behind a private gerrit, then they
don't know to use what they can't see.
Sent from my iPad
> On Sep 26, 2016, at 12:54 AM, Luke Hinds wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am sure this might have already been discussed, if so apologies.
>
> Is there any reason we do
Al,
Yes, maybe in future elections with only one nominee that'd (candidate &
abstain) be a way to go. Thanks for the feedback.
Unfortunately, selection by acclamation wasn't an option for OPNFV based on
the Bylaws and the Delaware Corporation Law (where OPNFV is incorporated).
Had to spend a lot
Hello,
How about we discuss this “external” repo topic on October 6th, Thursday?
Thanks
Bin
From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Raymond Paik
Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2016 12:10 PM
To: Luke Hinds
Cc: Scott Nicholas
Hi Ray,
For an election with one Candidate, I expect to
vote for the Candidate or abstain. In other orgs,
this would have been selection by acclamation,
without the ballot.
The ranking of “Yes” and “No” choices is visible to me, but
choices of “Chris Price” and “Abstain” would have been more clea
Luke,
"External" repos is something we want to have a discussion on in early/mid
October (borrowing Bin's Thursday Technical Community Discussion mtg.)
In OpenStack, if someone contributes to the github repo, do some of those
github contributions also get "moved" to the main OpenStack repo? If y
Al,
Do you not see two options ("Yes" or "No")? I actually see that a few
people voted already, so I'm not sure if others are also having the same
problem
Thanks,
Ray
On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 11:50 AM, MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
wrote:
> Since there’s only one choice, the ballot page is
>
> a
All,
Just a quick reminder that the nomination period for the new TSC Chair
closes on September 30th. I know many have been heads-down on Colorado
1.0, but please send me your nominations before Friday
Thanks,
Ray
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 6:29 AM, Raymond Paik
wrote:
> Apologies for multi
Since there’s only one choice, the ballot page is
a little confusing. It appears all you can do is
click Submit, as there is no ranking to do.
Al
From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Raymond Paik
Sent: Sunday, September
All:
For committers that are eligible to vote (
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/DEV/2016+Committer+Board+Election+-+Committers+List)
in the Committer Board election, you will be receiving an email from "Ray
Paik (CIVS poll supervisor)" to cast your vote. Please note that the email
will not be comi
Hi,
I am sure this might have already been discussed, if so apologies.
Is there any reason we don't mirror our repos to github (similar as happens
with openstack).
I ask as it could encourage more developers to get involved by increasing
exposure (especially for independents).
We already have a
Hi, Luke,
My experience so far included mostly DEB packages, which fell in 3 categories
for Armband:
- Backported from newer distro (lots of Ubuntu Xenial arm64 DEBs
backported to Trusty)
- Patched until upstream pulls our fixes (lshw is a good example, it’s
broken in all arm
Hi Alex,
What constitutes CI? If you could give one specific case of what you see as
needing packaging, that would be useful.
Cheers,
Luke
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 6:07 PM, Alexandru Avadanii <
alexandru.avada...@enea.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I started a very small etherpad for gathering ideas abo
23 matches
Mail list logo
