Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] wrong configured spam-filter for openwrt-dev

On 30.04.2015 12:48, Bastian Bittorf wrote: > while sending a mail to openwrt-dev, > i got this answer, which doesnt make any sense, > because the list only accepts "registered" users anyway: > > : host mail.openwrt.org[78.24.191.176] > said: 554 5.7.1 Service unavailable; Client host [176.9.57.13

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Combine CA-certificates in one file

On 12.06.2015 21:20, micke.p...@telldus.se wrote:> 2015-06-12 09:39 skrev Cristian Morales Vega: > >> On 12 June 2015 at 08:30, wrote: >> >>> Some packages or libraries cannot use split ca cetificates in a folder. >>> This adds a config to combine all certificates into one file. >> >> I have not

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v4] base-files: add /etc/profile.d support

On 04.09.2015 11:51, karlp wrote: > include() { > local file > > for file in $(ls $1/*.sh 2>/dev/null);

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v4] base-files: add /etc/profile.d support

On 04.09.2015 12:36, Bastian Bittorf wrote: > * edgar.sol...@web.de [04.09.2015 12:30]: >> note from a bystander. this looks wrong - path/file names containing spaces >> will be delimited by for. probably better use > > for the sent patch this works: > > root@box:~ touch "A 1" > root@box:~ touch

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v4] base-files: add /etc/profile.d support

On 04.09.2015 13:55, Karl Palsson wrote: > Jo-Philipp Wich wrote: >> Hi. > >>> Why the -e? You only got existing files in the glob above right? > >> Almost. If the directory does not exist or is empty then the glob >> pattern is returned literally, e.g. "echo /tmp/*" will expand to a list >> o

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Renaming trunk to Dxx Dxx ? Or seperate name for Trunk?

How about Trusty Trunk.. no cocktail though.. so far.. ede On 10.09.2015 22:08, Tobias Welz wrote: > Just following up with the T... T... idea - I found some T T Cocktails: > > Tahitian Tea > Tahitian Treat > Tanqueray Tonic > Tanzanian Tonic > > > > Am 09.09.2015 um 19:57 schrieb Hannu Nyman

[OpenWrt-Devel] uclient-fetch & SSL WAS:Re: DD: CONFIG_BUSYBOX_DEFAULT_WGET is not set

On 22.01.2016 14:32, Weedy wrote: >> Question: The busybox binary (for me) goes from 366,401 bytes to 300,327 > with the removal of wget from it. Therefore, the uclient-fetch binary > swapout causes a 46,379 byte increase in size. I assume the desire to move > to uclient-fetch from busybox is for

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] uclient-fetch & SSL WAS:Re: DD: CONFIG_BUSYBOX_DEFAULT_WGET is not set

On 22.01.2016 16:20, Felix Fietkau wrote: > On 2016-01-22 16:03, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote: >> On 22.01.2016 14:32, Weedy wrote: Question: The busybox binary (for me) goes from 366,401 bytes to 300,327 >>> with the removal of wget from it. Therefore, the uclient-fetch binary >>> swapout cause

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] uclient-fetch & SSL WAS:Re: DD: CONFIG_BUSYBOX_DEFAULT_WGET is not set

thx John! neat.. that should do the trick. finally a small ssl capable wget, jippee! ..ede On 22.01.2016 22:32, John Clark wrote: > There is a symbolic link: > > lrwxrwxrwx1 root root13 Jan 22 20:04 wget -> > uclient-fetch* > > > On 1/22/16 4:29 PM, edgar.sol...@web.de wro

[OpenWrt-Devel] international keyboard layout support

hey All, while tinkering with Gluon the Openwrt based Freifunk firmware (currently on CC) on a x86 based thin client box i needed support for a german keyboard layout. i managed to realize that manually as i didn't find any prepared packages for this purpose. is there any interest in a keyboar

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] SVN to GIT transition / paid patch-checking

On 13.10.2015 12:44, Imre Kaloz wrote: > On Tue, 13 Oct 2015 12:33:35 +0200, Bastian Bittorf > wrote: > > > >> It should be easy possible to get funding from all the companies which >> work with OpenWrt. Is this in option? > > Not until we have a nonprofit organization as companies can't have

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH v1 1/1] openssh: disable passwords for openssh server

hey All, On 2/15/2018 20:50, Magnus Kroken wrote: >>> This is just about the default configuration, it's not a choice between >>> conflicting compile time options with varying security implications. While >>> key authentication may be best practice, allowing SSH password logins isn't >>> on the

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Help, how to troubleshoot openwrt crash(reboot)

On 11.10.2014 20:40, document wrote: > hi, > > how to troubleshoot openwrt crash(reboot) ? > > i have openvpn-2.3.2 installed from opkg but when i manually start it about > 1min passed, router (openwrt-12.09) will reboot. > > when i enabled openvpn service on startup, router will auto reboot fo

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] [packages] dnsmasq: add option --quiet-dhcp

On 07.01.2015 23:50, Lars Kruse wrote: > > The --quiet-dhcp setting increases privacy by omitting DHCP lease logs > including MAC addresses. > > Signed-off-by: Lars Kruse > > --- a/package/network/services/dnsmasq/files/dnsmasq.init > +++ b/package/network/services/dnsmasq/files/dnsmasq.init >

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt release name

On 06.04.2015 09:35, John Crispin wrote: > i think we have a winner with 96 vs 50 votes. > >> == Dirty Diamond == >> 2 cl Rum >> 2 cl Vodka >> 2 cl Tequila Silver >> 2 cl Campari >> 2 cl Curaçao Blue >> 2 cl Lime syrup >> 2 1/2 cl Orange juice >> Coca Cola i also

[OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt DD release name v2

ok, took the freedom to set up another vote, incl. the third option. let's see what the numbers say in a few days. http://doodle.com/9d262b569bh4r7kv it'd make sense that everybody retakes the vote to have the truest election result. regards ..ede __

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Designated Driver

hmm.. seems like all doodle polls, incl. the original one suffer from this weakness. hereby i declare defeat and hope you Hartmut will count the votes properly, manually as seems necessary. +1 for Designated Driver ..ede PS: i will deactivate the flawed doodle poll now > On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 a

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Dark Destroyer

On 08.04.2015 00:33, Peter Lawler wrote: > On 08/04/15 05:47, Hartmut Knaack wrote: > >> Give your +1 answer on this mail if you prefer "Dark Destroyer". > How does that even work? You're not giving an option to vote for > anything else. > simply write your vote in the subject and have a mail bo

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Dark Destroyer

On 08.04.2015 00:45, David Lang wrote: > On Wed, 8 Apr 2015, Peter Lawler wrote: > >> On 08/04/15 05:47, Hartmut Knaack wrote: >> >>> Give your +1 answer on this mail if you prefer "Dark Destroyer". >> How does that even work? You're not giving an option to vote for >> anything else. > > There ar

[OpenWrt-Devel] test

___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [JPP-Devel] Fwd: SVN: [6214] core/trunk

On 06.01.2020 12:37, Michaël Michaud wrote: > Hi Ede, > > I did a quick try and it seems to work fine. > Seems that the change you did is rather big. I'll try to go deeper into your > change to try to understand. go ahead :) > What about the SO remark > (https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1884

[OpenWrt-Devel] time for OJ 1.15 everyone?

new year, new OJ. start of the year is OJ release time traditionally by now. are we in agreement? a snappy new NY to one and all ..ede ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-dev

Re: [sdwalker/sdwalker.github.io] 2bdb42: This week's update

is the below weekly message of any informational value to _all_? can someone maybe block this if it's not? ..thanks ede On 08.05.2022 23:05, Stephen Walker via openwrt-devel wrote: The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the ori

Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] coreutils: Import from packages feed

On 08.01.2023 00:02, Thibaut wrote: Le 7 janv. 2023 à 22:41, Robert Marko a écrit : On Sat, 7 Jan 2023 at 16:26, Thibaut VARÈNE wrote: Le 7 janv. 2023 à 15:06, Christian Marangi a écrit : On Fri, Jan 06, 2023 at 11:49:44PM -0800, Brian Norris wrote: I need to express a per-target de

Re: sysupgrade broken on imx nand targets (and maybe others too)

On 24.01.2023 17:13, Lanchon wrote: the problem lies elsewhere: on your platform something is rebooting the system asynchronously while it is updating. this is very dangerous and must be fixed elsewhere in code. just a wild guess. faulty power supplies sometimes lead to reboots if the power

Re: [PATCH 2/4] base-files/functions.sh: do not iterate over ls

On 20.09.2020 07:31, Rosen Penev wrote: > - for file in $(ls $1/*.sh 2>/dev/null); do > - . $file > + for file in "$1"/*.sh; do > + [ -e "$file" ] || break > + . "$file" the existence check is probably meant to catch "../*.sh" entry found if no files ma

Re: Override MAC address for interface?

On 23.02.2023 13:49, Peter Naulls wrote: On 2/23/23 01:43, Rafał Miłecki wrote: On 22.02.2023 21:02, Peter Naulls wrote: config device option 'lan1' This line is clearly wrong. See how you specify device name in above section. Perhaps it is "clear" but there's much in OpenWrt t

Re: [PATCH master,23.05] ramips: fix ZyXEL NR7101 bricking typo

On 15.10.2023 21:59, Paul D wrote: This needs to be applied to 23.05 and master ASAP.  It is already bricking devices. how about quickly removing the erroneous image from https://downloads.openwrt.org/releases/23.05.0/ plus adding a prominent red NOTE on https://openwrt.org/toh/zyxel/nr7101

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Maintainer address not reachable [Was: [PATCH] net/freeswitch: Make upstream-defaults package installable]

On 27.02.2013 15:33, Florian Fainelli wrote: > Hello, > > On 01/31/2013 09:11 PM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I just got a mailer daemon notice that open...@slickdeals.endjunk.com >> didn't get this mail because the mail server for its domain couldn't be >> connected by mine. >> >> Who

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] TP-Link TL-WR841ND to replace WRT54GL?

On 06.03.2013 19:40, Gert Doering wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 07:33:44PM +0100, a...@mykolab.com wrote: >> The TL-WR841ND may very well be a good choice. You can also consider >> the TL-WR1043ND, it has solid support (I have had about four of them and >> tested rather heavily over t

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Iozone openwrt package

On 31.05.2013 13:48, devendra.aaru wrote: > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 5:18 PM, Bastian Bittorf > wrote: >> * devendra.aaru [31.05.2013 13:44]: >>> The patch i generated spans upto 1M as since it contains the source >>> code of iozone and i bit modified it since it doesn't compile (aio.h >>> and as

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Question on UCI Lua license

On 13.08.2013 21:54, Jeff Remy wrote: > Hi, > I have a question regarding the UCI Lua bindings license. > libuci itself is LGPLv2.1, the cli utility is GPLv2 and the Lua > bindings are GPLv2. > I was wondering if this was on purpose? > It does not seem to be in line with the library but again, ther

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Compiling custom kernel for latest trunk

On 15.01.2013 16:41, Emmanuel Deloget wrote: > Le 12/01/2013 16:08, darius a écrit : >> Hello, >> >> Simple question for those who know. I do 'make kernel_menuconfig' then >> select some needed features in kernel and then do 'make -j3' in topdir. >> After image is done, I install it on the router

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] how to set busybox's some options now ?

On 17.12.2013 16:14, Yousong Zhou wrote: > On 17 December 2013 22:13, openwrt-de...@couprie.net > wrote: >> Hi yousong, >> >> Can you give a example how to call menuconfig for busybox ? > > I am doing menuconfig for busybox in OpenWrt build environment in > which busybox tarball has already been

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 0/4] dnsmasq: DNSSEC support

On 16.06.2014 10:40, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: > On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Steven Barth wrote: >> > Hi Nikos, >> > Is there a reason for not having dnssec by default? If there is a way >> > to disable it, I believe it will only be beneficial to have it in. >> > The main problem here i

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 0/4] dnsmasq: DNSSEC support

On 16.06.2014 11:56, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: > On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:53 AM, wrote: >>> On the contrary I'd prefer if it doesn't. Nettle is an open project >>> under LGPL that anyone can contribute and can be reused by a variety >>> of software; polarssl is closed commercial project un

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 1/1] kmod-input-xxx: missing dependency on kmod-input-core

On 27.07.2011 17:57, Philip Prindeville wrote: > On 7/27/11 4:19 AM, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote: >> Hi. >> >>> - KCONFIG:=CONFIG_INPUT_EVDEV >>> + KCONFIG:=CONFIG_INPUT_EVDEV +kmod-input-core >> >> This looks wrong. >> >> ~ Jow > > Specifically? > wouldn't it be DEPENDS:=+kmod-input-core ? ede __

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH][PACKAGE] upgrade openvpn package

On 29.08.2011 16:14, Jan Willies wrote: > Hi Luka, > > 2011/8/21 Luka Perkov mailto:open...@lukaperkov.net>> > > define Package/openvpn > SECTION:=net > CATEGORY:=Network > + SUBMENU:=VPN > DEPENDS:=+kmod-tun +libopenssl +PACKAGE_openvpn_complzo:liblzo > > > The lzo

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH][PACKAGE] upgrade openvpn package

On 29.08.2011 16:44, Jan Willies wrote: > 2011/8/29 mailto:edgar.sol...@web.de>> > > On 29.08.2011 16 :14, Jan Willies wrote: > > Hi Luka, > > > > 2011/8/21 Luka Perkov >> > > >

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH][PACKAGE] upgrade openvpn package

On 29.08.2011 17:14, Jonas Gorski wrote: > On 29 August 2011 17:04, wrote: >> On 29.08.2011 16:44, Jan Willies wrote: >>> 2011/8/29 mailto:edgar.sol...@web.de>> >>> >>> On 29.08.2011 16 :14, Jan Willies wrote: >>> > Hi Luka, >>> > >>> > 2011/8/21 Luka Perkov >>

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH][PACKAGE] upgrade openvpn package

On 29.08.2011 18:17, Luka Perkov wrote: > On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 05:32:10PM +0200, Jan Willies wrote: >> 2011/8/29 >>> right missed that. and yes reversing would be most elegant. ede > > I don't see why reversing would be most elegant. Now you can fully tweak > your openvpn package. > you miss

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] replace CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE with CONFIG_PREEMPT

On 02.09.2011 12:39, Luka Perkov wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 10:46:37AM +0200, Florian Fainelli wrote: >> On Friday 02 September 2011 00:55:54 Luka Perkov wrote: >>> Also in linux-2.6.39.4/kernel/Kconfig.preempt you will see for >>> CONFIG_PREEMPT: >>> >>> Select this if you are b

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt GPL compliance

On 20.09.2011 14:33, bifferos wrote: > So how do I know what version of packages was pulled in at the time of > building? I can assume the package source itself ends up in the 'dl' > directory, so I can back that up so I have the pristine package source, but > what about the patch set that was

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt GPL compliance

On 20.09.2011 13:56, bifferos wrote: > > I'd like to provide a binary build of OpenWrt packages, however I want to > comply with the terms of the GPL. I figured the most obvious thing to do > would be to copy the way OpenWrt does things. I'm not convinced that OpenWrt > complies with the GPL

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Help -- Noob Question -- Driving Me Crazy

On 11.11.2011 20:51, Mike Brady wrote: Can someone tell be or direct me to an example of how to put a linux version conditional into an OpenWrt package Makefile please? What I want to do is say "if this is and version of Linux 2.4 then do stufft". I've tried something like ifeq ($(CONFIG_LINU

[OpenWrt-Devel] reaver-wps package Makefile available

for the unaware http://code.google.com/p/reaver-wps/ somebody created a package Makefile for reaver in the forum https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?pid=152639 ..ede ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwr

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] WBMR-HP-G300H flash image for flashing from original FW?

On 23.02.2012 19:21, John Crispin wrote: > dd-wrt webif on openwrt? ..ede ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] parted and EFI_PARTITION=y

On 29.02.2012 12:24, cl...@bit63.org wrote: > In this case I am not sure what the best course of action is. > What is the OpenWRT way to enable kernel options that aren't kernel modules? you can add a simple config var to your Makefile, like CONFIG_KERNEL_*=y these are automatically translated t

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] parted and EFI_PARTITION=y

> Quoting edgar.sol...@web.de: > >> On 29.02.2012 12:24, cl...@bit63.org wrote: >>> In this case I am not sure what the best course of action is. >>> What is the OpenWRT way to enable kernel options that aren't kernel modules? >> >> you can add a simple config var to your Makefile, like >> CONFIG

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] parted and EFI_PARTITION=y

On 29.02.2012 14:16, cl...@bit63.org wrote: > Quoting edgar.sol...@web.de: > ... >> more along the lines of >> >> ... >> >> define Package/parted >> SECTION:=utils >> CATEGORY:=Utilities >> SUBMENU:=disc >> DEFAULT:=n >> TITLE:=GNU Parted manipulates par

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] lighttpd-nossl

On 19.03.2012 10:52, Christiane Ruetten wrote: > Hi, > > would you be able to easily add a variant of the lighttpd > package without the massive libopenssl dependency? It is almost > completely filling up the flash in 4 MByte routers, leaving > almost no headroom for further functionality, and ht

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] lighttpd-nossl

Maybe you are lucky and someone steps up. You are probably better of finding the maintainer (if there's one) directly by looking at the revision log or asking in the openwrt irc channel. The mailing list is often slow in this regard. If it all does not happen in time frame you planned in then yo

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] lighttpd-nossl

had a look at irssi. does this actually work when both packages are selected? don't you end up with two packages both containing whatever was build first? ..ede On 19.03.2012 13:18, Peter Wagner wrote: > Hi, > > look at the ctorrent or irssi Makefile. There you can see how to implement > the

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] lighttpd-nossl

hadn't seen it. yes, different build dir should work. thanks ..ede On 19.03.2012 15:05, Peter Wagner wrote: > both packaes are build in a sepreate folders > so yes - you can select both packages. > > But you can also building both and testing it ;) > > /Peter > On Monday 19 March 2012 13:24:24

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Initial support for Mikrotik RB751G-2HnD and RB751U-2HnD

this is different from client to client. if unsure or unable to fix it simply attach the patch to the email. this way it will survive whatever comes. people on this mailing list like the patches inline for commenting, but heck.. if it does not work out for you, simply attach it (for usage) *and*

[OpenWrt-Devel] new hotplug-radiobutton package

Attached you will find a new admin package, which contains a hotplug script for switching wifi on/off if the router has a ses button. This is readymade and tested for wrt54g(s,l) and wl500w models. Makefile is provided. Youre welcome to integrate it in the packages feed, as it is very openwrt spe

[OpenWrt-Devel] hotplug radiobutton

Hi all, https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/5256 is still open and waiting for check in. thanks ede ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

[OpenWrt-Devel] new package hotplug radiobutton script

Hi all, 2 months ago I created the following ticket. https://dev.openwrt.org/attachment/ticket/5256/ It announces a new ses button wifi switch script. I assume it was not added because of the inappropriate format. Today I added a patch to the ticket which holds the new package changes against

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] IXP4XX , LUCI can't work. Browser can't open WEB.

in case you used the luci trunk. There was a missing dependency which prevented luci from starting properly. You can try $ /etc/init.d/lucid restart lucid[1022]: Failed to initialize daemon https: /usr/lib/lua/luci/sys.lua:33: mo dule 'iwinfo' not found: no field package.preload['iwinf

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] IXP4XX , LUCI can't work. Browser can't open WEB.

did you install the luci theme? anything in logread or dmesg? ... ede On 11.08.2009 10:49, linux_pro wrote: i user luci svn ： 5252 ps w display lua -lluci.lucid -e luci.lucid.start() i not know what's wrong, Looks is all right 2009/8/11 linux_pro: i try it but display: stopping lu

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] IXP4XX , LUCI can't work. Browser can't open WEB.

then something else is wrong and luci not working only a symptom .. smells as if your networking has problems .. ede On 11.08.2009 11:03, linux_pro wrote: y, default is install luci theme. I checked. on the ttyS0, top or dmesg is work. but user telnet ,top or dmesg is"Freeze" 2009/8/1

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] IXP4XX , LUCI can't work. Browser can't open WEB.

you can try to narrow down the changeset that causes the problem by checking out revisions, buildroot them and flash them on the device .. ede On 12.08.2009 04:27, linux_pro wrote: I very sure , SVN 17220 LUCI can't work. i backup SVN 15XXX, is ok. so,my mi424(ixp425) hardware is OK. HI, Mark

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] IXP4XX , LUCI can't work. Browser can't open WEB.

seems like the route back is not properly set .. ede On 12.08.2009 10:31, linux_pro wrote: O! i user ttyS0 on the mi424, ping my PC IP 192.168.1.26, display time out but on the my PC, ping MI424 192.168.1.1, is OK i iptables -F iptables -Z not diff 2009/8/12 linux_pro: thanks ede i try

[OpenWrt-Devel] hotplug radiobutton package

Hello Jow and Felix and all developers. Is there any reason that this new package https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/5256 is whether commented nor committed to trunk? I also announced it 2 times on this list. Thanks ede ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openw

[OpenWrt-Devel] PING .. hotplug radiobutton package - please check in

Hello Jow and Felix and all developers. Is there any reason that this new package https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/5256 is whether commented nor committed to trunk? This is the 4th submission on this topic. Please somebody answer. Thanks ede ___ openwr

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] WiFi on Linksys WRT54GL

You have the proprietary _and_ the open source driver under 2.4. Do both show this issue? ... ede On 21.09.2009 10:05, Vladimir Voronkov wrote: Hi, I tried 2.4 kernel and the problem of the driver is the same as why it was removed in 2.5 kernels, I suppose. WiFi stops working if the router i

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Packages were found, but none compatible with the architectures configured

I recall having similar issues when using a recent trunk compiled image (after the kernel upgrade) and trying to use a kmod package from the 8.09.1 repository ... I guess it's the kernel version. ede On 20.10.2009 12:33, ZioPRoTo (Saverio Proto) wrote: # opkg install kmod-sched Collected erro

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [OpenWrt] #6081: Wifi toggle package propose

I checked the trunk version of "wifi" and calling "wifi up" or just "wifi" is the same. This means that this script can't enable connection that have the wifi disabled at the config file. Also that is impossible to use a default off on power up. true .. that can only be achieved by toggling the

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] building trunk stuck at scripts/kconfig/conf trying to read from stdin

probably the question if you want to enable kernel float emulation. QUESTIONs: Is there a way to disable this prompt? How do I enable a softfloat in the toolchain? Thanks ede Hi Timo, Am 22.11.2009 12:11, schrieb Timo Juhani Lindfors: and "strace -p ..." confirmed that the last process was b

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Upgrade the babel package, renaming it to babeld

You manage the openwrt svn by a git interface? .. ede I don't know how you can force svn to generate proper patches - I use git and it's better at handling such things. - Felix ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https

[OpenWrt-Devel] category patches for libpar2 & rdiff-backup

Hi all, find attached two patches that fix a wrong categorizations for the mentioned packages. libpar2 belongs in libraries rdiff-backup in utilities Thanks ede Index: feeds/packages/libs/libpar2/Makefile === --- feeds/packages/

[OpenWrt-Devel] bump and fix strongswan 2.8

Hi all, the attached patch bumps strongswan 2.8 for 2.4 kernels to latest version 2.8.11 and fixes a compile error because of the missing circleq implementation in uclibc. regards ede PS: can somebody point me to a good guide to set up strongswan with pptpd on openwrt? Thanks. Index: feeds/

[OpenWrt-Devel] add vars for uci firewall include scripts

the change to uci_firewall.sh omitted the necessary variables for the /etc/firewall.user script and the like. This patch adds them again. regards ede Index: package/firewall/files/uci_firewall.sh === --- package/firewall/files/uci_f

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] add vars for uci firewall include scripts

I copied it over from 7.09's /etc/init.d/firewall init script ... and it worked for my script.. LAV doesn't seem to be set there. Would you like me to add LANDEV? .. ede On 09.12.2009 19:15, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Shouldn't you add "LANDEV" too?

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] add vars for uci firewall include scripts

well, it wouldn't hurt and maybe somebody might need it in the future. Also maybe some other variables for wireless and the like. But, I have problems to figure out where the scripts gets the network values from. It's not in the general nvram vars available by 'uci show'. ... ede On 09.12.200

[OpenWrt-Devel] bump pptpd to 1.3.4, minor fixes

attached is a patch that bumps pptpd to the latest version. It contains patches to fix two compile issues & removes the obsolete pptpgre_use_debug_option patch. Also pptpd is now depending package ppp, as pppd is needed to run pptpd. kind regards ede Index: feeds/packages/net/pptpd/patches/002

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] syslog-ng should log kernel messages as well

you are right vasilis .. I just tried it with syslog-ng3 .. the syslog-ng manual also states page 38 "On Linux, the klogd daemon can be used in addition to syslog-ng to read kernel messages and forward them to syslog-ng. klogd used to preprocess kernel messages to resolve symbols etc., but as

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] syslog-ng should log kernel messages as well

But then the FAQ contradicts this with it's "expanded syslog-ng.conf" (http://www.campin.net/syslog-ng/expanded-syslog-ng.conf) where it uses: dunno what that site is but http://www.balabit.com/network-security/syslog-ng/ is where syslog-ng comes from source s_kernel { pipe("/proc/kmsg" log_

[OpenWrt-Devel] bump iptables to 1.4.6

find attached a patch that updates iptables to recent version 1.4.6. Modified are the imq patch and the Makefile to resemble changes in iptables. I moved the patches back into the ./patches folder as there is no reason anymore to keep them in ./patches/ although I used git to create the patch,

[OpenWrt-Devel] ping on patches for pptpd and iptables

these patches are unanswered/pending bump pptpd to 1.3.4, minor fixes https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2009-December/005409.html bump iptables to 1.4.6 https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2009-December/005423.html regards ede _

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] syslog-ng should log kernel messages as well

I still object to the inclusion of this patch. At least for syslog-ng3. The developers of syslog-ng clearly state in their http://www.balabit.com/dl/guides/syslog-ng-v3.0-guide-admin-en.pdf that /proc/kmsg should not be opened with pipe driver, but with file() instead and also log_prefix is depre

[OpenWrt-Devel] and again, ping on patches for pptpd and iptables

Original Message Subject: [OpenWrt-Devel] ping on patches for pptpd and iptables Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 16:49:55 +0100 From: edgar.sol...@web.de Reply-To: OpenWrt Development List To: OpenWrt Development List these patches are unanswered/pending bump pptpd to 1.3.4, minor fix

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] More preinit fixes

On 26.01.2010 09:29, Daniel Dickinson wrote: > Ticket #6575: Patch for brcm47xx, hopefully it will boot again. Working The patch is for brcm-2.4 ? ..ede ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/li

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Hotplug automount fixes/enhancements

(stability) Quite a chunk of code. Did you write it from scratch? How thoroughly is this tested by now? Does this work with kernel 2.4? Lot's of users are stuck to these kernels. (packaging) I don't mean to be picky, but wouldn't it make sense to keep code that depends on specific package with tha

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] remount /dev/root readonly for shutdown

Is there a sync command before the unmount? Maybe the system does not reach the umount call, and therefor it is never cleanly unmounted? You could debug that. Maybe the controller is caching and needs specific commands to write the cache to disc? Did you search the web? good luck, ede On 30.01

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] usb storage performance

On 07.02.2010 08:38, Damian Lesiuk wrote: > I think something is wrong with usb-storage kernel driver on wl-500g premium > v1. brcm-2.4? > When I am copying something between partition I have 100 kB/s - 300 > kB/s, the same action on wl500g.googlecode.com firmware, I have 10 > mB/s. > In additio

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Automount enhanced/fixed, also fstab

At a quick glance it looks promising. I understand the need of the copyright notice. I am no core developer but I guess you would have to license the files under GPL2 by adding the appropriate notice. Any file including existing GPL2 code would have to be licensed GPL2 anyway. Will try it out thes

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Automount enhanced/fixed, also fstab

What do you think of packaging hotplug automount separately? Now that it's that sophisticated it takes several kilobytes of space. Space that is valuable to users without non-usb-routers. We could start a 'Base System / Hotplug Scripts' submuenu. A perfect place also for the wifi toggle script, if

[OpenWrt-Devel] compression mode of jffs2

I discovered a currently not used option of jffs2. It allows the setting of a compression mode. Because size matters on embedded devices I wonder why this is not enabled. Attached a patch that does that. I tried it and it works. More info on the available switches also here http://mhonarc.axis.se/

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] compression mode of jffs2

This is kind of difficult as the internal flashes are usually very small. A dd read write of 2MB is not really a test. But generally I guess the probably very little speed difference is worth the space saved. I guess it is little because there is no optimization switch for speed. ede On 07.02.201

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Automount enhanced/fixed, also fstab

The swap parts should be part of base files. The needed swapon/off could come from util-linux or busybox. .. ede On 07.02.2010 07:00, Daniel Dickinson wrote: > This time with the patch > > On Sun, 2010-02-07 at 00:58 -0500, Daniel Dickinson wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Here is the automount patch I'v

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] compression mode of jffs2

Any idea how to measure boot time? I don't have serial console access. ede On 08.02.2010 11:14, Bas Mevissen wrote: On Sun, 2010-02-07 at 18:00 +0100, Matthias Buecher / Germany wrote: How will this affect performance (the opposite side of compression)? If it does, then it would be great if thi

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] compression mode of jffs2

On second thought I actually think it would make sense to clarify the following points before taking any action. Not that I expected anything to happen soon ;) 1. How is the compression evaluated. On per file or per file system basis. I couldn't really find docs telling this. Any hint appreci

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Automount enhanced/fixed, also fstab

On 09.02.2010 06:12, Daniel Dickinson wrote: On Sun, 2010-02-07 at 16:26 +0100, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote: What do you think of packaging hotplug automount separately? Now that it's that sophisticated it takes several kilobytes of space. Space that is valuable to users without non-usb-routers.

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] luci web interface package

install a theme. For some reason they are not automatically selected. Annoying all the time ;) .. ede On 10.02.2010 10:59, Iwan Budi Kusnanto wrote: Hi All, I managed to compile & install openwrt for avila gateworks. But, i can't install the luci web interface. These are what i do : - In make

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] luci web interface package

Can you send a 'opkg list_installed' ? Which platform you are on ? ede On 11.02.2010 04:43, Iwan Budi Kusnanto wrote: edgar.sol...@web.de wrote: install a theme. For some reason they are not automatically selected. Annoying all the time ;) I did. it is automatically selected. I use kamikaze

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Automount enhanced/fixed, also fstab

On 12.02.2010 22:13, Daniel Dickinson wrote: I think the packaging needs the following properties: 1) scripts for functionality (e.g. uuid and label, using blkid) are automatically installed if the main block-mount (as I've called) is installed, and the dependency is satisfied (.e.g if block-moun

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Automount enhanced/fixed, also fstab

I'd rather keep them optional, that's why the log tells if it misses blkid. Actually it doesn't. And it's only automatically selected if the base block-mount package is selected, so it is optional, but you don't have to worry about individual dependencies, and things work as expected without

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Automount enhanced/fixed, also fstab

Lets start here OpenWrt does not currently run on devices which have 2MB or less of flash memory. This limitation will probably not be worked around since those devices are most of the time micro-routers, or Wireless Access Points, which are not the main OpenWrt target. This reads to me only a

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] sudo: update to 1.7.2p3

(thanks for http://pastehtml.com/view/5tfitwd.html) Nice. Where does this come from? .. Is it dynamically updated? .. ede ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

  1   2   >