On 29.08.2011 18:17, Luka Perkov wrote: > On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 05:32:10PM +0200, Jan Willies wrote: >> 2011/8/29 <edgar.sol...@web.de> >>> right missed that. and yes reversing would be most elegant. ede > > I don't see why reversing would be most elegant. Now you can fully tweak > your openvpn package. >
you missed the reference > which incidentially shows that the option names are misleading and > they should be renamed or their effect reversed, so that they enable, > not disable (I'd prefer the latter). OPENVPN_LZO is not only shorter than OPENVPN_DISABLE_LZO , it also reads better if it is reversed !OPENVPN_LZO . But for that the values in Config.in would have been to be reversed too. The solution now works. All is well.. ede _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
