On 22.01.2016 16:20, Felix Fietkau wrote: > On 2016-01-22 16:03, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote: >> On 22.01.2016 14:32, Weedy wrote: >>>> Question: The busybox binary (for me) goes from 366,401 bytes to 300,327 >>> with the removal of wget from it. Therefore, the uclient-fetch binary >>> swapout causes a 46,379 byte increase in size. I assume the desire to move >>> to uclient-fetch from busybox is for the SSL support? If so, it still does >>> not support SSL without also building ustream-ssl. >> >> yeah. an ssl capable wget (whatever it's called) out of the box would be >> greatly appreciated. >> >> @Felix: is that on the table? > It's already done. With uclient-fetch, you can simply install any > ustream-ssl variant (along with ca-certificates if you want to have > proper validation), and it'll immediately be SSL capable. That was my > main motivation behind replacing wget with ustream-ssl. > > The aforementioned size increase is probably either a bug or a > measurement error (see my other mail regarding that subject). >
nice! is there a possibility to create a wget wrapper? i assume not everyone is familiar with uclient-fetch, so at least a stub noting to use uclient-fetch might probably help when users are confused that wget isn't there. ..ede _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
