Hello Bruno,
yet another tool used in Ninux.org:
https://github.com/ninuxorg/misc_tools/tree/master/adsl_check
What you want to implement is a generic tool... that checks a network
condition and if this condition happens triggers an event.
Yes it would be a nice tool. However routing protocols
Wow,
I received your email on so many mailing lists that I could not stop
from answering.
Could you please give some context about what is prplwrt ?
I have been working with OpenWrt since 2006 and it is the first time I
hear about prplwrt.
The website did not help, and all this people are unknown
> I don't have a number off hand, that's still being decided. My feeling has
> been that's it'd be in the tens of thousands USD total. I'll try to get more
> of finalized amount as soon as possible.
Hello Eric,
considering that a Senior Engineer in the SF Bay Area has an average
income of 120.000
> who says that we have to involve them into a decisional process? All they do
> is offer money for some projects in which industry partners are interested in
> as well. Of course, bringing the contributions back to upstream should be made
> a requirement, but I don't really see anything bad in thi
> Great! Thanks for your good work!
> Could you please add a tag for 15.05.1 in the git repo?
That would be great. I am trying to git bisect a bug and I have no
idea on top of what commit is 15.05.1 built.
thank you :)
Saverio
___
openwrt-devel mailing
you
Saverio
2016-04-04 22:38 GMT+02:00 Bruno Randolf :
> On 04/04/2016 09:34 PM, Saverio Proto wrote:
>>> Great! Thanks for your good work!
>>> Could you please add a tag for 15.05.1 in the git repo?
>>
>> That would be great. I am trying to git bisect a bug and
Who has commit rights on the other tree ? So we can send an email to
have it fixed ?
thank you :)
Saverio
2016-04-05 15:42 GMT+02:00 John Crispin :
>
>
> On 05/04/2016 15:33, Saverio Proto wrote:
>> Thanks Bruno,
>>
>> I am sorry I am coming back to OpenWrt after a l
This patch is also available here:
https://github.com/zioproto/openwrt15051-batman/commit/0281382bcaa139f0d1d3b589797af4c434747f3e
commit 0281382bcaa139f0d1d3b589797af4c434747f3e
Author: Saverio Proto
Date: Sun May 1 23:14:19 2016 +0200
ramips: Fix IPv6 neighbor discovery on RT5350
seem to have sent the same patch which does not look whitespace
>> broken. i'll use that one instead.
>
>
> My patch is not for CC... it's for trunk which uses the newer rt305x driver.
>
> Cheers,
> Vittorio
>
>
>>
>> John
>>
&g
Hello,
I am very happy about moving to Github.
Saverio
2016-05-24 16:06 GMT+02:00 Luka Perkov :
> Dear OpenWrt mailing list readers,
>
> as the subject says I'd like to make proposal to move the OpenWrt
> codebase to Git. This was already discussed before [1] and now when
> there are no blockers
Hello John,
there will be no release branch here ?
http://git.openwrt.org/
thanks
Saverio
2014-07-14 11:12 GMT+02:00 John Crispin :
>
> The OpenWrt developers are proud to announce the first release
> candidate of OpenWrt Barrier Breaker.
> ___ __
> |
Hello everyone !
Relax :) If we are reading this list it is because we all want a
better OpenWrt, and we all do the best we can for it.
Etienne in my experience the OpenWrt group is really open. The problem
is the that core people have to face thousands of contacts over the
Internet from unknown
I think the business model of StartSSL and others, is that they give
certificates for free, but you have to pay a lot in case you need to
revoke a certificate.
my 2 cents
Saverio
2015-02-14 19:31 GMT+01:00 Alessandro Di Federico :
> On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 18:21:41 +0100
> phaidros wrote:
>
>> No
I think the one for the NanoStation should work as well:
http://downloads.openwrt.org/barrier_breaker/14.07/ar71xx/generic/openwrt-ar71xx-generic-ubnt-nano-m-xw-squashfs-factory.bin
I never tested, but ubnt devices are all similar.
Saverio
2015-02-12 21:27 GMT+01:00 Ken Buska :
> Is there anyon
Have a look at this repo:
https://github.com/libre-mesh/ruci
Small utility for mass backup / restoring of OpenWrt routers configurations.
Saverio
2015-03-21 15:49 GMT+01:00 Janne Cederberg :
> Greetings all!
> Been searching around and found for example OpenWISP but thought I'd
> ask the list a
Hello Bastian,
I successfully imported the patches in my tree.
Give me a little time for testing.
ciao,
Saverio
2013/3/11 Bastian Bittorf :
> these inline patches are also here for download them:
> https://github.com/bittorf/kalua/blob/master/openwrt-patches/0001-packages-olsrd-init-for-better
> Anything i can do to speedup things?
no :(
I have to find some free time for the testing :(
Saverio
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Hello,
I have a personal version of nodogsplash OpenWRT package and I noticed
today I was missing this patch from the main tree:
https://github.com/ninuxorg/ninux-openwrt-packages/commit/92f90fae6ef6e29f789c2c7a539c4a3efb31b70d
when I added this:
define Package/nodogsplash/conffiles
/etc/nodogs
This models that are not built have 4Mb flash ? maybe you are trying
to build an image that is too big, so only the images of the models
with 8Mb of flash are generated. This is a common question.
Saverio
2013/4/8 cmsv :
> I have had this problem in the past for a couple router models/version
>
do you have a version of snmpwalk that works with IPv6 ? :)
I tried to dive into that about a year ago but then I gave up because
IPv6 and snmp is not yet well supported on Linux. Please if you have
better news tell me ! :)
ciao,
Saverio
2013/4/25 Pietro Paolini :
> Hello all,
>
> I am experien
Patch is attached,
please commit at least to trunk packages.
ciao :)
Saverio
polipo-openwrt.patch
Description: Binary data
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
> 1. That's commit 1144bc9a from Polipo master. Please include proper
> cross-referencing information in the future.
I just got the patch from the Debian .deb package "as it was" and I
added it to the OpenWRT package. There is a reference to the commit in
the patch.
How can I cross-reference bett
>> 2. The patch description is incorrect -- the bug symptom is not
>> SIGPIPE. SIGPIPE is globally ignored by Polipo.
>
> I had polipo segfaulting before applying this patch. With gdb I
> thought to understand it was a SIGPIPE problem, but I can be wrong
> because I am not a experienced developer.
I used a port for a similar board (cubieboard).
It works good for me with a external kernel tree.
You might want to look at this:
https://github.com/zioproto/openwrt-sunxi/tree/sunxi-rebased
It is pretty similar board, with ARM Cortex processor.
Saverio
2013/6/24 Artur Wronowski :
> Thanks for
Hello,
the attached patch updates softflowd package.
the current version is broken and not working, so please apply this patch asap.
there is currently no maintainer, if community agrees we can move this
package to openwrt-routing feed so I can take care of it.
Saverio
softflowd-version-bump-
Hello Luka,
my github name is zioproto and my email is correct in the MAINTAINERS file.
Saverio
2013/10/6 Luka Perkov :
> Dear openwrt-routing feed committers,
>
> I've added MAINTAINERS file to the openwrt-routing git repository.
> Please update that file with your real name and valid email add
> *) we should not have feature or testing branches in feeds
what is the problem with testing branches ?
as long as the necessary branches are there with the correct names, I
dont see the drawback of the extra branches.
thanks
Saverio
___
openwrt-deve
Hello Luka,
I tested before the Cubieboard with OpenWrt and and external kernel
tree, I had some notes here:
http://wiki.ninux.org/CubieboardOpenWrt
I built now a new openwrt trunk image with your latest patches.
https://dev.openwrt.org/changeset/38651
I have the kernel booting, but I am stucke
> I've added only minimal support, it only worked with initramfs. Since
> last night (r38811) Zoltan took over the target and pushed 3.12 kernel.
> He should give you more information at this point as I have not tested
> it yet.
Thanks.
I see now r38785 that is even more important.
I compiled the
The image that is not generated is for a device with 4Mb flash ? If
your build makes a larger image you will find only 8Mb images
generated but not the smaller ones.
I hope this help.
best regards
Saverio Proto
2012/10/25 Sivateja Patibandla :
> Hey guys,
>
> I've updated my
FYI
-- Forwarded message --
From: Justin Vallon
Date: 2012/10/29
Subject: [OpenWrt-Users] Wifi trouble
To: openwrt-us...@lists.openwrt.org
Found this in system log, wifi stopped working:
Oct 29 04:03:43 kiwi kern.err kernel: [14858.50] ath: phy0: Failed
to stop TX DMA, que
Hello,
did you notify this problem upstream to radvd developers also ?
thanks
Saverio Proto
2013/1/2 Nathan Hintz :
> When running 'top', I sometimes see RADVD consuming a lot of CPU (some times
> close to 50%). I put some debug statements into RADVD, and have found that
>
Hello Manuel,
I will test your patch as soon as possible.
thanks
Saverio
2012/12/22 Manuel Munz :
> The initscript for tinc writes a temporary config into /tmp/tinc. In the
> prepare_net function it appends flags and params from the uci config to
> the temporary tinc.conf for each net. These v
Hello Jack,
did you send this patch also to the mini_snmpd developers to have this
patch in the next releases ?
thanks
Saverio Proto
2012/12/21 Jack Bates :
> Support monitoring wireless signal and noise with SNMP. This is based on
> the demo example distributed with Mini SNMP Daemon. H
Hello Manuel,
I tested on my router and now the patch is committed in r35053
https://dev.openwrt.org/changeset/35053
thanks
Saverio
2013/1/3 Saverio Proto :
> Hello Manuel,
>
> I will test your patch as soon as possible.
>
> thanks
>
> Saverio
>
>
> 2012/12/22 M
Hello,
you need to post what svn revision of OpenWRT you are compiling.
best regards
Saverio Proto
2013/2/4 Pietro Paolini :
> Hi all,
>
> I catch a problem in compiling the toolchain, I am under a:
>
> Linux pedr0debian 2.6.32-5-686 #1 SMP Sun Sep 23 09:49:36 UTC 2012 i
Hello list,
do you get this email ? I got some bounces to my emails to the list
from Mailer Demon of Google with this reason:
The recipient server did not accept our requests to connect. Learn
more at http://support.google.com/mail/bin/answer.py?answer=7720
[(0) list.openwrt.com. [173.212.56.232
Yes,
somebody wrote directly to me with Cc list.openwrt.org, and my reply
to all started to generate this bounce.
thanks
Saverio
2013/2/8 Florian Fainelli :
> On 02/08/2013 10:46 AM, Saverio Proto wrote:
>>
>> Hello list,
>>
>> do you get this email ? I got some
Hello,
today I tried to boot the latest trunk with my CubieboardA10, but I
cannot boot at all.
I followed this guide:
http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/hardware/soc/soc.allwinner.sunxi
the most important stuff is:
dd if=openwrt-sunxi-Cubieboard-sunxi-with-spl.bin of=/dev/sdb bs=1024 seek=8
then I for
thanks
Saverio
commit c172caa7844b2d10e7c9d8ac574673a6451746ef
Author: Saverio Proto
Date: Mon Mar 10 14:22:05 2014 +0100
Fix VLAN on Atheros AR8327N
https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/12181
With this patch tagged and untagger frames are working on the same port
diff --git a/target
Yes,
the patch makes possible to have tagged+untagged vlan on the same port
at the same time.
please read https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/12181 for more details
Saverio
2014-03-31 16:05 GMT+02:00 Damian Kaczkowski
:
> On 31 March 2014 14:05, Saverio Proto wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>
/zioproto/openwrt-trunk-zioproto/commit/e7226ba45d7198dff71fde3caa1be9962f9f4ef1
please review it and merge it into trunk.
Saverio
2014-03-31 14:05 GMT+02:00 Saverio Proto :
> Hello,
>
> I cleaned up and rebased on current trunk the patch found on the
> following ticket:
> https://dev.ope
Hello,
the patch is attached to this email.
thanks
Saverio
2014-04-24 12:47 GMT+02:00 John Crispin :
>
>
> On 24/04/2014 12:44, Saverio Proto wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> talking about: https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/12181
>>
>> patch has been tested @ N
eady present.
>
> P.S: @Saverio feel free to resend the patch yourself if you agree with the
> changes.
>
> Regards,
> Álvaro.
>
> El 24/04/2014 12:56, Saverio Proto escribió:
>> Hello,
>>
>> the patch is attached to this email.
>>
>> thanks
we upgraded the ninux firmware to the latest OpenWrt AA.
We run into a possible bug. When STA is OpenWrt and AP is AirOS we are
not able to associate to the Access Point. We tested with the same
configuration and device the two versions of the firmware. Here the
commits:
Bad:
6deba98c3814ca9414ef
Hello Gui,
AirMax is disabled.
The configuration on the AirOS node is always the same with AirMax disabled.
I can associate with the good commit and I cannot when I use the bad commit
Saverio
2014-05-20 18:06 GMT+02:00 Gui Iribarren :
> On 20/05/14 05:25, Saverio Proto wrote:
>> we
of course the default x86 target should work, anyway I'd like to compile a
optimized image with the following CFLAGS:
OK, I found an easy answer my self
Browsing with "make menuconfig" I went to
Advanced configuration options (for developers)
--- Toolchain Options
--- Target Optimiz
I found the following bug in the Backfire buildroot:
If package X is in a submenu, if it exist another package Y that
requires X, than X is not represented anymore in the submenu but at
the same hierarchy of this parent. Note that Y must exist and do not
need to be selected.
Because of this the s
Hello,
please can you resend to me the patch as attachment ? my email client
mangled the patch.
I will review it today. thanks
Saverio
2012/5/17 Moritz Warning :
> The tinc init script needs to know all valid options used in /etc/conf/tinc.
> This patch updates that list to tinc 0.18 (current
I applied your patch
https://dev.openwrt.org/changeset/31837
Saverio
2012/5/17 Moritz Warning :
> On 05/17/2012 09:56 AM, ZioPRoTo (Saverio Proto) wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> please can you resend to me the patch as attachment ? my email client
>> mangled the patch.
&
Looks like the committer for the OpenWRT package is Marek:
https://dev.openwrt.org/browser/packages/net/batman-adv
did you report this problem to him ?
bye :)
Saverio
2012/5/23 Pedro Nuno Costa Rodrigues :
>
> Hello, my name is Pedro, and I'm writing from Portugal.
>
> I would like to ask some
> No release is necessary. The OpenWrt stable maintainer(s) need to backport
> that fix to stable or you do it yourself or you use trunk.
Hello,
this conversation come out to be very interesting to me. I finally
realize why Ninux Pisa uses OpenWRT trunk and not a stable realease.
Marek may I ask
Thanks !
I included the patch in the Ninux firmware, as soon as I have it
tested I will report. However the patch looks so trivial that I would
ask to package maintainer to commit it immediatly :)
Moritz maybe you are interested in forking our git repository:
https://github.com/ninuxorg/nodogspla
Hello,
I found a bug ! :)
I need this block of configuration for olsrd:
LoadPlugin "olsrd_mdns.so.1.0.1"
{
PlParam "NonOlsrIf" "br-lan"
PlParam "TTL_Check" "true"
PlParam "MDNS_TTL" "20"
}
So I write this UCI syntax
config LoadPlugin
option library 'olsrd_mdns.s
Hello,
I just wanted to share that I found a version of the TP-Link
TL-WR1043ND with 16MB of RAM instead of 32MB. Watch out before buying
your router :)
I opened the case and the RAM chip is Hynix H5DU2562GTR-E3C
The version on the sticker in the outer case is v.1.0 (DE) but printed
in the inner
Hello,
at Ninux we bought a stock of new Ubiquiti Picostation m2hg and we
noticed that the radio does not work with backfire because the
processor is not anymore ar7140 rev 2 but AR7141 rev. 1 (at least this
is the only difference we spotted).
With trunk the radio works again, so we just wonder w
Do you have qos-scripts enabled ? maybe they are not properly configured.
Saverio
2011/7/31 jerry M :
> I installed OpenWRT r.27797 on DIR-601 (hw.A1).
> All pings from LAN to WAN have very high latencies which also vary a lot.
> For example, outbound ping to www.google.com normally has latency
Hello,
I'm upgrading olsrd to 0.6.2
I should keep this patch ? It was introduced because the output is
parsed by some web interface ?
https://dev.openwrt.org/browser/packages/net/olsrd/patches/200-txtinfo_gateways_formatting.patch
The txtinfo plugin changed a bit in 0.6.2.
http://olsr.org/git/?
Hello,
the following patch do not apply cleanly to olsrd 0.6.2
https://dev.openwrt.org/browser/packages/net/olsrd/patches/910-quagga_workaround_remove.patch
is the new version of olsrd fixing the problem so we can remove tha
patch from the OpenWRT feed, or the patch needs upgrading to compile
wi
I'm trying the patch Gioacchino,
so now config should look something like this ?
config mini_snmpd
option enabled 1
option ipv6 0
option community public
option location 'Via Gallia'
option contact 'ziopr...@gmail.com'
option interfaces 'lan'
> config mini_snmpd
> option enabled 1
> option ipv6 0
> option community public
> option location 'Via Gallia'
> option contact 'ziopr...@gmail.com'
> option interfaces 'lan'
> option interfaces 'wan'
I found my self to add more than one interface
> can you check if you can add that patch? It includes improvements for
> 6and4 operation and also for syetup of smartgw. I'm running olsrd 0.6.1
> with this patch for about half a year now and it works as expected here.
> It should apply clean to the init file because nothing was changed there
> a
Hello Nico,
i just applied a patch submitted by Manuel Munz.
https://dev.openwrt.org/changeset/29134
I tested this stuff in the last 24 hours and it works to me.
In the same time I was testing you updated the init.d file... I solved
the conflict ignoring your changes.
Using start-stop-daemon i
Hello Nico,
I tested and reworked Gioacchino's mini_snmpd patch to support uci
interfaces names instead of real interface names.
please check and commit. I would commit myself but I do not have
permission for that folder
ciao :)
Saverio
mini_snmpd.patch
Description: Binary data
__
Hello,
from about 16 hours now I cannot browse smoothly dev.openwrt.org ..
most of the time I get
504 Gateway Time-out
Saverio
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Hello,
I starting to work with git, maybe this link:
git://nbd.name/backfire.git
should be published here:
https://dev.openwrt.org/wiki/GetSource
I don't have rights to edit this wiki :)
thanks
Saverio
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@l
> Nice! The era of git-svn is finished :D
it is actually started from my point of view :)
Saverio
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
> Recordings?
> If you want to view the presentation later, please go to
> http://sc.superbetram.com/archive/
broken link :(
Regards
Saverio Proto
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
http://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bi
Hello,
I know some of you were at the CCC camp.
At our Italian camp this August (http://camp.olografix.org) a dear
friend (Michele Favara Pedarsi) presented his video report on the CCC
camp.
Here is the link where the Italian hackers published it:
http://www.olografix.org/sapereaude/
Enjoy the
o submit to mainline that adds new functionalities
(and also adds them to OpenWRT because Iperf is a supported package ;)
)
Anybody knows how to get in contact with the authors of Iperf ??
Thank You :)
Saverio Proto
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
op
> I'm wondering why the 8.09 RC1 announcement was not made here. It was
> made on the "forums" at
[..CUT..]
thanks for reporting on mailing list! I never read forums ...
maybe is time also to update the wiki/trac main page:
https://dev.openwrt.org/
*** there is also a 8.09 tag of the packages
>> *** there is also a 8.09 tag of the packages folder ?? ***
>> I think this is _VERY_ important!
> We decided to not tag packages for 8.09 until we introduce build
> system related API changes, so that 8.09 users can keep updating
> their packages.
> The feeds.conf.default was set up in a way th
> We decided to maintain packages outside of the release cycle, so that
> people always get the latest package updates, even when using the
> release branch.
Let me tell you this story first :)
At Ninux.org we tried to mantain a meta-package of OpenWRT, that was
supposed to configure the router to
l_ the spam disappeared!!
Moreover if you don't want to type the captcha everytime and you are
frequent user of the wiki, it is enough to add your user name to the
TrustedEditorGroup page... http://wiki.ninux.org/TrustedEditorGroup
Regards :)
Sa
> Rsync is open on openwrt.org, someone should make daily snapshots and mirrors.
>
> I think the whole mirror is something like 12GB.
Here you go:
http://aquila.netgroup.uniroma2.it/~saverio/openwrt-mirror/
It goes both IPv4 and IPv6
To sync I used:
rsync -av --delete --exclude '.*' --timeout=
> Here you go:
>
> http://aquila.netgroup.uniroma2.it/~saverio/openwrt-mirror/
any feedback ? Is anybody actually using it ?
Saverio
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
http://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt
Hello,
I'm working on some packages [1] for OpenWRT and I run in the following problem:
I have this package "ninux-ipkg-brcm" that basically writes some
configuration files and modifies some init.d stuff.
The package compiles fine:
make package/feeds/ninux/ninux-ipkg-brcm-compile V=99
But when
Ehm, I received no answer and I'm stuck with this nasty problem :(
Maybe my explanation was unclear... so I try again:
There is a way to force a package to be installed after another
package when creating the firmware image ?
Thank you
Saverio
___
ope
> Use "PKG_BUILD_DEPENDS". It works similiar to DEPENDS but is for compile time.
I know that feature but it does not solve my problem.
I have no problem when I do:
make -compile
but I have the problem when I do:
make -install
anyway I found a way out.
When the "install" process start, all th
> Some improvements for running the olsrd more easier with IPv6. So you can now
> for example run with two
> instances, one IPv6 and one IPv4, with IpVersion 6and4.
[..CUT..]
> Signed-off-by: Alina Friedrichsen
Hello Alina,
I'm testing the olsr 6and4 configuration.
I'm using OpenWRT 8.09 branc
> This is a quick fix for the HNA-Problem with the "6and4-Mode". I will
> hopefully get the time to
> rewrite and clean up the complete script in the next weeks. This patch is for
> get it working now.
thank you :)
Should the patch be included on the OpenWRT Trac attached to this
ticket: https:
> is there an easy way to compile everything, where compilation errors do
> not stop the compilation process?
> As manually removing a problem package and manually restarting is
> wasting a lot of time.
> All compilation errors should be stored in a log so that they can be
> checked afterwards.
I
https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/5356
I found a little bug and I opened a ticket on the trac.
Regards :)
Saverio Proto
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
included on the OpenWRT Trac attached to this
> ticket: https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/4803 ?
I tested the patch and it works good to me.
It is possible to apply the patch to the olsrd package and close the ticket ??
Regards
Saverio Proto
___
openwrt-d
IPv6 firewall I'd like to be able to assign
IPv6 addresses to my router !
But how do you assign IPv6 addresses at boot ?
Can you reproduce this bug ?
https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/5356
there is out there some patch not already committed that fixes this
, engineers, artists, curious and academics.
Presentations on technical and social topics will be faced with the
most expert people in the area of the wireless community networks,
that will come to Rome from all Europe.
Regards, Saverio Proto
___
openwrt-devel
Hello,
asking on the olsrd-dev lists I've been told something like this was
missing, so I implemented it into a package feed. Sorry if you receive
this mail multiple times because you are subscribed to more mailing
lists.
adding the following feed:
echo "src-svn zzzninux
https://svn.ninux.org/sv
Please upgrade olsrd to 0.5.6-r6 also in 8.09 branch.
Necessary patch is attached.
Thank you
Saverio
Index: net/olsrd/Makefile
===
--- net/olsrd/Makefile (revisione 18046)
+++ net/olsrd/Makefile (copia locale)
@@ -9,13 +9,13 @@
inc
I compiled a firmware for Fonera with the current 8.09 branch r18049
and looks like WiFi is broken in ad-hoc mode.
Now I'm compiling again with tag 8.09.1 to see if the problem is
related to a recent changeset.
I'll keep you updated.
Saverio
___
openwr
> # opkg install kmod-sched
> Collected errors:
> * Packages were found, but none compatible with the architectures configured
I had the same problem with weekend upgrading some packages on same
devices running 8.09.1 tag, and packages were compiled using the trunk
toolchain.
I don't know exactl
> What is the proper way to support such build? Obviously, it can be
> easily done by creating two completely independent package
> specifications, but that would lead to unnecessary duplication.
look at the iperf package for an example:
https://dev.openwrt.org/browser/packages/net/iperf
it is on
Hello,
at Ninux.org we want to get rid of a our custom package that
configures the router for our network but introduces file collision
between packages.
I heard there is a script that is run at the first boot where we can
introduce some "uci set" commands ... what is the name if this script
?
t
>> Are there any other uml openwrt users out there? What are you doing
>> with the new uml releases (aside from developing openwrt?)
Hello,
sorry if you receive this email twice because you are in both mailing lists.
I successfully compiled a OpenWRT UML Image and used it in the Netkit [0]
I go
> very interesting!
> The page you mention has been linked from the Netkit web site:
> http://wiki.netkit.org/index.php/Labs_Links.
thanks ! :)
> About the tap, host-side setup is performed by the
> $NETKIT_HOME/bin/manage_tuntap script, and this is almost all that is
> required to get it running
> very interesting!
> The page you mention has been linked from the Netkit web site:
> http://wiki.netkit.org/index.php/Labs_Links.
Massimo there is a little wrong detail on the web site.
I did not use only the OpenWRT kernel. I used both OpenWRT kernel AND
filesystem ! :)
Saverio
__
Alina wrote:
> I think the one IP per interface principle is a legacy thinking.
I agree with that, long time ago I opened this ticket:
https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/2829
is was IPv4 but it was the same problem.
Bastian wrote:
> PS: see you at 26c3!
I'll also be there ! :)
Saverio
___
I think I found a bug in scripts/kconfig.pl
looks like if I use the name openwrt-8.09.1-UML for the folder where I
have my buildroot the build process dies at "make target/linux"
look here:
save...@nordkapp ~/SORGENTI/openwrt-8.09.1-UML $ make V=99
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/saverio/SORG
Hello Nico,
I'm still testing some UML stuff, I understand now why I was not able
to compile the 8.09.1 tag on my x86_64 host.
I was able to compile trunk because there is patch from trunk:
https://dev.openwrt.org/browser/trunk/target/linux/uml/patches/002-gcc4_unfortify_source.patch
that patche
> I applied your patch in r19069 - sorry for the delay.
I don't understand if this patch changes how to write the configuration file
For example I have some blocks like this in my /etc/config/dhcp
config host macprosaverio
option name macprosaverio
option mac 00:23:6c:99:87:be
Is rsync at openwrt.org now closed ?
Saverio
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
1 - 100 of 142 matches
Mail list logo
