Hello Alvaro, I have another user (Cc: in this email) reporting wdr4300 working with the original patch.
I updated my tree with your changes, and rebased on current trunk: https://github.com/zioproto/openwrt-trunk-zioproto/commits/ticket12181 You are just deleting this code right ? https://github.com/zioproto/openwrt-trunk-zioproto/commit/c4a8e0a8f164d03074d55e649e883422ae03c905 Alvaro and Domantas MrVisata, can you please tell me your testing setup? I would like to understand what is working for Domantas and what is not working for Alvaro. If you just post your /etc/config/network it would be enough. Thanks. Saverio 2014-05-02 3:07 GMT+02:00 Álvaro Fernández Rojas <[email protected]>: > Hello, > > I've tested this patch but I couldn't get it completely fixed on AR8327 > (TL-WDR4300). > > However, I've modified it and successfully configured the switch for untagged > + tagged. > https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/4708147/openwrt/patches/ar8327.patch > > The problem was in ar8327_sw_set_ports(), which I suspect was copied from > ar8216_sw_set_ports(), without removing the code that disables all tagged > ports if an untagged port is already present. > > P.S: @Saverio feel free to resend the patch yourself if you agree with the > changes. > > Regards, > Álvaro. > > El 24/04/2014 12:56, Saverio Proto escribió: >> Hello, >> >> the patch is attached to this email. >> >> thanks >> >> Saverio >> >> >> 2014-04-24 12:47 GMT+02:00 John Crispin <[email protected]>: >>> >>> >>> On 24/04/2014 12:44, Saverio Proto wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> talking about: https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/12181 >>>> >>>> patch has been tested @ Ninux.org on TP-Link WDR3600. We are now >>>> able to successfully have tagged and untagged frames together on >>>> the same port. >>>> >>>> Here is the clean version of the patch rebased on current trunk: >>>> https://github.com/zioproto/openwrt-trunk-zioproto/commit/e7226ba45d7198dff71fde3caa1be9962f9f4ef1 >>>> >>>> please review it and merge it into trunk. >>>> >>>> Saverio >>> >>> hi Saverio, >>> >>> can you send the cleaned up version to the -devel list ? that way its >>> inside out patchwork and we can mark the old version superseeded >>> >>> John >>> _______________________________________________ >>> openwrt-devel mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> openwrt-devel mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
