Comments…
> On Nov 9, 2020, at 7:22 PM, Yousong Zhou wrote:
>
> This is mainly to handle stderr message "Broken pipe", "F+P records
> in/out" by common pattern "xcat | dd .."
>
> Ref: https://bugs.openwrt.org/index.php?do=details&task_id=314
Reviewed-By: Philip Prindeville
> On Nov 10, 2020, at 6:45 AM, Yousong Zhou wrote:
>
> The intent is to make it sound more like info level message, not some
> error like "404 not found". x86 target at the moment makes image with
> only signature but no metadata
Reviewed-By: Philip Prindeville
> On Nov 10, 2020, at 6:45 AM, Yousong Zhou wrote:
>
> This is mainly to handle stderr message "Broken pipe", "F+P records
> in/out" by common pattern "xcat | dd .."
>
> Ref: https://bugs.openwrt.org/index.p
Reviewed-By: Philip Prindeville
> On Nov 10, 2020, at 6:45 AM, Yousong Zhou wrote:
>
> Ref: https://bugs.openwrt.org/index.php?do=details&task_id=3140
> Reported-by: Philip Prindeville
> Signed-off-by: Yousong Zhou
> ---
> target/linux/x86/base-files/lib
I liked the idea of including whois.
I think it should be one of those things that gets enabled if we’re not doing a
super-skinny-build.
And if I’m at a remote location and OpenWRT isn’t coming up enough for me to
run “whois” on a laptop behind it, then having it on OpenWRT itself makes it
tha
> On Nov 23, 2020, at 2:52 PM, Rosen Penev wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 10:39 AM Georgi Valkov wrote:
>>
>> Dear Rosen,
>>
>> Thanks to your help I discovered the feeds/packages repository, however I
>> was not able to resolve the race condition during build and discover why
>> Errno
Hi,
I’m working on a PR to add X.509 certificates to Strongswan for authentication
and that all seems to be working fine:
https://github.com/openwrt/packages/pull/14028
But I can’t figure out why my traffic isn’t being passed, even though the
tunnel comes up:
root@OpenWrt2:~# ip xfrm state
s
Hi.
I’m currently manually doing the following in a script but was wondering if
there was an easy way to do this in UCI, such as in /etc/config/network:
#!/bin/sh
INTF=xfrm0
STB=192.168.3.6/24
TABLE=stb
GW2=192.168.1.252
NETS="151.101.0.0/16"
eval `ipcalc -n -p $STB`
if ! grep -q "^200 $TABLE
But I’m trying:
config rule
option src '192.168.3.6'
option lookup 200
Per the cheatsheet and it’s resulting in:
root@OpenWrt2:~# ip rule ls
0: from all lookup local
1: from all lookup 200
32766: from all lookup main
32767: from all lookup default
i.e. the ’src’ is b
> On Dec 7, 2020, at 1:28 AM, Florian Eckert wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> openwrt.git includes an old version of QEMU (0.14 vs 5.1.0 in
>> packages.git) only to convert x86 images to vdi and vmdk. Is there
>> anyone actively using the vanilla x86 QEMU images from the upstream
>> servers or can can we r
Hi,
I’m the maintainer of ISC-DHCP.
I’m trying to do the integration “glue” to allow one to operate a DNS private
zone inside your intranet (aka “split horizon”) and prime it with both static
data as well as DHCP lease information.
Ideally this could be done with a minimum of UCI configuration
> On Dec 15, 2020, at 1:22 AM, Bjørn Mork wrote:
>
> Philip Prindeville writes:
>
>> I’m trying to do the integration “glue” to allow one to operate a DNS
>> private zone inside your intranet (aka “split horizon”) and prime it
>> with both static data as
> On Dec 16, 2020, at 12:59 AM, Bjørn Mork wrote:
>
> Philip Prindeville writes:
>>> On Dec 15, 2020, at 1:22 AM, Bjørn Mork wrote:
>>>
>>> Philip Prindeville writes:
>>>
>>>> I’m trying to do the integration “glue” to allow one to
Responses…
> On Dec 17, 2020, at 1:56 AM, Bjørn Mork wrote:
>
> Philip Prindeville writes:
>
>> https://github.com/openwrt/packages/pull/14240
>>
>> The previous one is a precursor for getting Bind to start before DHCPD.
>
>
> That makes more se
Heads up that there’s a major change to the PR:
https://github.com/openwrt/packages/pull/14240
It adds support for “cname”, “domain”, “mxhost”, and “srvhost” config sections.
Thanks to Bjorn for pointing me at how to use nsupdate to do this.
Calling out run-time requirements on “named” and “ns
Reviewed-by: Philip Prindeville
> On Jul 10, 2020, at 4:47 AM, Adrian Schmutzler
> wrote:
>
> The find command to retrieve files from /etc/sysupgrade.conf and
> /lib/upgrade/keep.d/* is used twice in almost similar way.
>
> Move it into a function to consolidate, en
Reviewed-by: Philip Prindeville
> On Dec 29, 2020, at 4:13 PM, Paul Spooren wrote:
>
> The qemustart script currently picks the ext4 filesystem rather than
> squashfs, while the latter is default for nearly all OpenWrt targets.
>
> Change the default behaviour of qemus
Reviewed-by: Philip Prindeville
> On Dec 29, 2020, at 4:13 PM, Paul Spooren wrote:
>
> The qemustart script currently picks the ext4 filesystem rather than
> squashfs, while the latter is default for nearly all OpenWrt targets.
>
> Change the default behaviour of qemus
Just because GDB can be used as an alternative, it’s not clear that we should
force people into that.
> On Dec 29, 2020, at 5:05 PM, Rosen Penev wrote:
>
> kdump was removed in 7acd257ae67b4ca94f8c23cb8bda0ee0709b9216
>
> gdb can be used as an alternative.
>
> Remove autoreconf. It's not ne
Hi,
Is anyone interested in adding a page to the openwrt.org site about developers
willing to do commercial work?
It could be as simple as:
* name
* email address
* mobile (if wanted)
* packages/platforms/architectures you maintain or have competence in
* whether you're available full-time, par
Hi,
I posted the following PR some time ago (late November) and it's languishing:
https://github.com/openwrt/packages/pull/14028
Can I get some reviews of it?
X.509 authentication is a more attractive alternative to simple PSK
authentication (more entropy, less susceptible to dictionary attack
As an alternative to dnsmasq, master now has isc-dhcp (v4 only) and Bind
integration, so that's getting close to the essential functionality that
dnsmasq provides.
I stopped using dnsmasq about 8 years ago because it has several minor
violations of the RFC's (which the Kelly's claim are conveni
> On Jan 22, 2021, at 12:03 PM, Daniel Golle wrote:
>
> Hi Philip,
>
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 11:23:42AM -0700, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is anyone interested in adding a page to the openwrt.org site about
>> developers willing to do
> On Jan 22, 2021, at 11:57 AM, Alberto Bursi wrote:
>
>
>
> On 22/01/21 19:23, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Is anyone interested in adding a page to the openwrt.org site about
>> developers willing to do commercial work?
>> It could be as
> On Jan 22, 2021, at 12:00 PM, Alberto Bursi wrote:
>
>
>
> On 22/01/21 19:53, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>> As an alternative to dnsmasq, master now has isc-dhcp (v4 only) and Bind
>> integration, so that's getting close to the essential functionality
I'll try splitting it into smaller pieces as well.
https://github.com/openwrt/packages/pull/14535
> On Jan 22, 2021, at 11:47 AM, Philip Prindeville
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I posted the following PR some time ago (late November) and it's languishing:
>
> h
> On Jan 24, 2021, at 12:56 PM, Paul Spooren wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 00:16, Sam Kuper wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 06:57:53PM -0500, Etienne Champetier wrote:
>>> Le sam. 23 janv. 2021 à 18:09, Sam Kuper a écrit :
I suggest that if a vote is held, it should be a thre
Reviewed-by: Philip Prindeville
> On Jan 25, 2021, at 4:48 AM, Adrian Schmutzler
> wrote:
>
> /lib/functions.sh was executable for no obvious reason and its
> execute property was even checked in package-ipkg.mk just to
> source it afterwards.
>
> Remove the execute
aul Spooren wrote:
>
> What's the size difference here. I'd be curious to replace dnsmasq for the
> default setup, but only if it brings an advantage in size and security.
>
> Just a personal interest.
>
> Best,
> Paul
> --
>
>
&g
> On Jan 26, 2021, at 2:09 PM, Paul Oranje wrote:
>
>
>
>> Op 22 jan. 2021, om 20:03 heeft Daniel Golle het
>> volgende geschreven:
>>
>> Hi Philip,
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 11:23:42AM -0700, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>>>
> On Jan 22, 2021, at 9:28 PM, Nishant Sharma wrote:
>
> On 23/01/21 3:13 am, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>
>> You'll need to remove the dnsmasq package and select
>> CONFIG_PACKAGE_isc-dhcp-server-ipv4 (or -ipv6 which actually supports both
>> IPv4 and IPv
Comments...
> On Feb 11, 2021, at 10:42 PM, Ilya Lipnitskiy
> wrote:
>
> The following commit removed _STAT_VER definitions from glibc:
> https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=8ed005daf0ab03e142500324a34087ce179ae78e
>
> That subsequently broke fakeroot:
> https://bugs.archli
> On Feb 12, 2021, at 10:52 AM, Ilya Lipnitskiy
> wrote:
>
> Hi Philip,
>
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 11:23 PM Philip Prindeville
> wrote:
>>
>> Minor nit, but please combine these into a single line:
>>
>>
>> Please indent nested #if
Inline
> On Feb 13, 2021, at 9:41 PM, Ilya Lipnitskiy
> wrote:
>
> The following commit removed _STAT_VER definitions from glibc:
> https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=8ed005daf0ab03e142500324a34087ce179ae78e
>
> That subsequently broke fakeroot:
> https://bugs.archlinu
x27;s been merged upstream:
> https://salsa.debian.org/clint/fakeroot/-/commits/upstream/
>
> No release yet, though. Do you want me to do another patch, getting
> rid of the upstreamed patches and using PKG_SOURCE_VERSION?
>
> Ilya
>
>
> Ilya
>
> On Sun, Fe
AX support. Cool.
Is there any UCI defaults stuff that needs to be touched for first boot and
discovery?
Comments:
> On Feb 15, 2021, at 3:19 AM, John Crispin wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: John Crispin
> ---
> .../files/lib/netifd/wireless/mac80211.sh | 193 +-
> .../mac8021
Hi,
I have some patches to Strongswan (mostly in packaging and UCI generation, not
the Strongswan binaries themselves) that I'd like independent testing and
verification. The maintainers have limited bandwidth to test, so others
testing and finding bugs and me fixing them first might be more e
From: Philip Prindeville
Signed-off-by: Philip Prindeville
---
iptables.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/iptables.c b/iptables.c
index
9e8fa743c99f84222307128047d40d657916aa75..49b34394dfec4df361ec1cf6778cade831454c7c
100644
--- a/iptables.c
+++ b
I'm seeing repeated failures when rebuilding strongswan for x86_64. From what
I can tell from the CI/CD logs, everything *is* being built with -fPIC, so I'm
not sure why we're still seeing:
2021-02-24T20:02:59.8624672Z OpenWrt-libtool: compile:
x86_64-openwrt-linux-musl-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -
> On Feb 25, 2021, at 12:12 AM, Ilya Lipnitskiy
> wrote:
>
> Hi Philip,
>
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 10:30 PM Philip Prindeville
> wrote:
>
>> -Wl,-Bstatic -Wl,-lgmp
> Does that tell ld to link against libgmp.a instead of libgmp.so? I
> didn't tr
> On Feb 15, 2021, at 11:52 PM, Brian Norris
> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 4:07 PM Ansuel Smith wrote:
>>
>>> Collected errors:
>>> * pkg_hash_fetch_best_installation_candidate: Packages for
>>> libreadline8 found, but incompatible with the architectures configured
>>> * opkg_install
Inline...
> On Mar 1, 2021, at 7:00 AM, Hannu Nyman wrote:
>
> Philip Prindeville philipp_subx at redfish-solutions.com wrote at Mon Mar 1
> 02:11:20 EST 2021:
> > Is there a workaround to force an install?
>
> * Build a new up-to-date version with the current pa
Reviewed-by: Philip Prindeville
> On Mar 3, 2021, at 1:48 PM, Rui Salvaterra wrote:
>
> GCC 10.2.0 complains loudly of missing limits.h. Add a patch to fix this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rui Salvaterra
> ---
> .../050-fix-build-include-limits.patch| 23 +++
David, Yousong:
Can we get a bump of firewall3 to HEAD again please?
Thanks
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
> On Mar 12, 2021, at 6:25 AM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>
>
> On 2021-03-12 11:34, Stijn Tintel wrote:
>> On 11/03/2021 23:46, Eneas U de Queiroz wrote:
>>> The library is always compiled with $(FPIC) (-fPIC or -fpic), even for
>>> the static library.
>>>
>>> There are some assembly sources that
From: Philip Prindeville
Fixes issue #14921, whereby inline ASM wasn't getting built as PIC;
look at gmp-6.2.1/mpn/x86/pentium/popcount.asm for example:
ifdef(`PIC',`
...
for a routine that exists in both PIC and non-PIC versions.
Make sure that wherever $(FPIC) gets passed as
> On Mar 19, 2021, at 4:06 PM, Eneas U de Queiroz wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 5:08 PM Philip Prindeville
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Maybe I'm missing something, but why not just fix rules.mk:
>>
>>
>> ifneq (,$(findstring $(ARCH) ,
Are you aware that many open source apps already do DSCP marking?
I submitted the changes to Firefox, Thunderbird, Cyrus, Proftpd, Sendmail,
Postfix, Curl, Wget, Apache... and this was more than 15 years ago.
Why would you want to overwrite marking if it's already present?
> On Mar 21, 2021, a
> On Mar 19, 2021, at 4:59 PM, Philip Prindeville
> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Mar 19, 2021, at 4:06 PM, Eneas U de Queiroz
>> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 5:08 PM Philip Prindeville
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Maybe I
Go for it.
> On Apr 11, 2021, at 8:50 AM, Etienne Champetier
> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> There are currently 65 members in OpenWrt org, 58 of them with 2FA enabled.
> Requiring 2FA would kick out the 7 users without 2FA, 6 of them have
> no OpenWrt related activity for more than 2 or 3 years, I'
Hi all,
Word is that strongswan-6.0 will remove the ipsec interface. No idea how many
5.9.x releases will come out before that happens. Doing some prediction based
on the past roadmap:
The cadence in the past has been every 3 months, and typically x.y.3 or x.y.4
is the maximum release until
Yup, amen to that, but it seems to be something that’s for whatever reason is
not quick to happen…
> On Aug 22, 2018, at 1:17 AM, Joel Wirāmu Pauling wrote:
>
> Currently the Auto-generated x86/64 images are all msdos
> partition/boot layouts. Which means they are a PITA to run on
> increasing
Hi all.
I was trying to rebase my branch to upstream/master recently, but I couldn’t
because this commit conflicted:
commit 9e3edeb55a2f85ecf6233a5780e495ea1755c998
Author: DUPONCHEEL Sébastien
Date: Tue Apr 11 12:46:44 2017 +0200
Generate EFI grub images for x86 platforms
Signed-off-
I’ve been busy with other things, and just had a chance to try to get caught up
with OpenWRT and my tickets, etc. I rebased openwrt and packages, then did
“make defconfig oldconfig” but I’m seeing:
WARNING: Makefile 'package/feeds/packages/zabbix/Makefile' has a dependency on
'libmariadbclient
> On Jun 30, 2019, at 1:03 PM, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
> wrote:
>
>
>> On 30 Jun 2019, at 19:27, Philip Prindeville
>> wrote:
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>> Anyone have an idea of what’s going on?
>
> There were some tweaks to how config in
I’m seeing the following failure after rebasing to master and 4.19:
make[3]: Entering directory '/home/philipp/lede/package/kernel/linux'
mkdir -p /home/philipp/lede/staging_dir/target-x86_64_musl/root-x86/stamp
SHELL= flock /home/philipp/lede/tmp/.root-copy.flock -c 'cp -fpR
/home/philipp/lede/
> On Jun 30, 2019, at 6:13 PM, Philip Prindeville
> wrote:
>
> I’m seeing the following failure after rebasing to master and 4.19:
>
> make[3]: Entering directory '/home/philipp/lede/package/kernel/linux'
> mkdir -p /home/philipp/lede/staging_dir/target-x86_64
> On Jun 30, 2019, at 9:54 PM, Philip Prindeville
> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Jun 30, 2019, at 6:13 PM, Philip Prindeville
>> wrote:
>>
>> I’m seeing the following failure after rebasing to master and 4.19:
>>
>> make[3]: Entering directory &#
I just ran:
% scripts/feeds update -i packages
% rm -rf tmp/
% make defconfig oldconfig
% grep libtirpc .config
% grep "Package: libtirpc” tmp/.packageinfo
% ls tmp/info/.packageinfo-feeds_packages_libtirpc
ls: cannot access 'tmp/info/.packageinfo-feeds_packages_libtirpc': No such file
or direct
LGTM
> On Aug 23, 2018, at 6:21 PM, Luis Araneda wrote:
>
> This fixes a problem that's causing an early return of
> default_prerm() when the package prerm script has an
> exit statement at the end, which is implemented as
> "exit 0" by most of the packages that use prerm
>
> With the new beha
I have some boards that came from the factory with the wrong MAC address burned
into wlan0.
What’s the minimum UCI required to associate a new MAC with them regardless of
what configurations they might appear in (i.e. in the be: “option ifname ‘eth0
wlan0’” etc).
Thanks.
-Philip
___
> On Sep 22, 2018, at 4:42 PM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
>
> Signed PGP part
> Hi,
>
> We talked about plans for the next OpenWrt releases in this mail thread:
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/openwrt-adm/2018-July/000849.html
> This mail is more or less a summary of the conclusions, this is
LGTM
Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 24, 2018, at 6:20 AM, Florian Eckert wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Florian Eckert
> ---
> package/base-files/files/lib/functions/network.sh | 5 +
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/package/base-files/files/lib/functions/network.sh
> b/packag
Jo-Philipp, Felix, et al:
I’ve added the following to my /etc/firewall.user but I was thinking it might
be useful for others, and worth integrating into the firewall.
It’s currently implemented in Shell, but should be trivial in C.
The relevant config (/etc/config/firewall) looks like:
config
I’m looking at:
https://git.openwrt.org/?p=project/firewall3.git;a=commitdiff;h=c03e20d7f594058ff223f30cf34de1b5e8210b8d;hp=b59934331c4b9271ceb5e30b793a552618299d39
and wondering, why not just do:
v4->s_addr = htonl(~(UINT_MAX >> bits));
For instance, with bits == 14, we get:
UINT_MAX >> 1
Comments inline
> On Sep 29, 2018, at 9:04 PM, Rosy Song wrote:
>
> From: Rosy Song
> Subject: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] fstools: mount ntfs with ntfs-3g utility if
> it exists
>
> This patch can mount ntfs with fuseblk fs type and make the deivces to be
> mounted writable.
>
> --- a/block.c
I’m not seeing where “mount.ntfs-3g” is being set as the program to use... and
should the test for the presence and modes of the program be generic? i.e.
regardless of what type of FS or which program you use to mount it, you’ll want
to test for its presence.
So these are really two independen
> On Oct 1, 2018, at 10:22 AM, Jérôme Benoit wrote:
>
> Signed PGP part
> Le 01/10/2018 à 06:21, Philip Prindeville a écrit :
>> I’m not seeing where “mount.ntfs-3g” is being set as the program to use...
>
> I think this patch is just plain wrong.
> A correct one
> On Oct 1, 2018, at 10:22 AM, Jérôme Benoit wrote:
>
> Signed PGP part
> Le 01/10/2018 à 06:21, Philip Prindeville a écrit :
>> I’m not seeing where “mount.ntfs-3g” is being set as the program to use...
>
> I think this patch is just plain wrong.
> A correct one
> On Aug 27, 2018, at 4:41 AM, Daniel Engberg
> wrote:
>
> As per request,
>
> https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/1297
>
> Longer tests with
> https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2018-July/013394.html
> without issues
>
> Not subscribed so please cc
>
> Best regards,
>
Can you drop the CAPS on words (not acronyms) and the _markup_?
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 18, 2018, at 6:28 AM, Koen Vandeputte
> wrote:
>
> starting from upstream commit 577b4eb23811 ("ubi: Reject MLC NAND")
> it is not allowed to use UBI and UBIFS on a MLC flavoured NAND flash chip. [1]
>
Some hardware (it’s rare but not unheard of) can only be reset by unloading and
reloading the module that controls it. Otherwise, you have to reboot the box.
If you build all of your drivers in, then rebooting is all you have.
My firewall has been up for 3 years. I update it with opkg, includ
Inline
> On Oct 31, 2018, at 11:02 AM, Tomasz Maciej Nowak wrote:
>
> Add files to bootfs image from selected as built-in packages, which want
> to install files to targets boot file system.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Maciej Nowak
> ---
> target/linux/x86/image/Makefile | 2 ++
> 1 file changed,
Why is the hwclock being dropped everywhere?
And who says the geos2, net5501, or alix2 are obsolete?
I have some running right here…
> On Jan 13, 2019, at 2:49 PM, Tomasz Maciej Nowak wrote:
>
> Drop excesive amount of default packages, instead, rely on packages
> specified in device definiti
Inline
> On Jan 15, 2019, at 12:40 AM, Tomasz Maciej Nowak wrote:
>
> Hi Philip
>
> W dniu 14.01.2019 o 21:10, Philip Prindeville pisze:
>
>> Why is the hwclock being dropped everywhere?
>
> It's provided by busybox and installed by default, also greping f
Hi.
I’m trying to add the Intel e1000e, igb, and ixgbe drivers that are on Source
Forge.
A snapshot of my work is here:
https://github.com/pprindeville/packages/tree/sf-ether
When I build this as “make -j1 V=s” using a mostly unmodified x86_64 generic
configuration, I get:
make[3]: Enterin
> On Dec 19, 2016, at 1:25 AM, Alexandru Ardelean
> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 1:41 AM, Philip Prindeville
> wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> I’m trying to add the Intel e1000e, igb, and ixgbe drivers that are on
>> Source Forge.
>>
>> A sna
On Dec 21, 2016, at 10:13 PM, Russell Senior wrote:
>> "Florian" == Florian Fainelli writes:
>
>>> However, I also agree with Dave, Alberto and Stefan that a name
>>> change may be a really smart way to communicate the fresh start of
>>> the project, a reboot, especially if the new name ri
> On Dec 25, 2016, at 1:01 PM, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
>
> In my humble opinion, for distros which can't use systemd because
> of the size, or won't use systemd because they don't like it,
> a good contender is daemontools or one of its clones.
> It is especially suited for a distros which target
Hi.
I wanted to be able to script building images completely. I understand how to
do:
cp ../my-saved-config .config
make defconfig
make oldconfig
to generate the .config file in a completely scripted way, by seeding it with
the minimum set of relevant parameters (the deltas) per the steps des
I just saw something bizarre.
I had a Perl module (CGI v4.35) which contained the following:
my $appease_cpants_kwalitee = q/
use strict;
use warnings;
#/;
which is just a quoted string containing the lines that some sanity checking
code expects to see (albeit as actual code, and not embedded a
> On Jan 2, 2017, at 9:32 PM, Philip Prindeville
> wrote:
>
> I just saw something bizarre.
>
> I had a Perl module (CGI v4.35) which contained the following:
>
> my $appease_cpants_kwalitee = q/
> use strict;
> use warnings;
> #/;
>
> which is just a
> On Jan 2, 2017, at 9:59 PM, Philip Prindeville
> wrote:
>
>
>> On Jan 2, 2017, at 9:32 PM, Philip Prindeville
>> wrote:
>>
>> I just saw something bizarre.
>>
>> I had a Perl module (CGI v4.35) which contained the following:
>>
>
> On Jan 2, 2017, at 10:08 PM, Philip Prindeville
> wrote:
>
> Okay, resolved…. I needed to change the Package/perl-cgi/install macro in
> the Makefile to invoke perlmod/Install/NoStrip instead of perlmod/Install.
> Sigh.
>
> Would it be reasonable to add a global
update-syslog-eventlog.patch
Description: Binary data
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Hi.
I’m working on a project (some GUI interfaces and a back end for generating
traffic shaping using netfilter/tc) written in PHP7.
It uses PHP’s “composer”.
I could install composer (it’s only ever run once on a released project) on the
target machine, and run it on first boot.
But that see
I did a “make dirclean” and then “make -j12” and I end up seeing the following
(it’s reproducible):
...
make[3] -C feeds/packages/utils/bash compile
make[3] -C feeds/packages/utils/bc compile
make[3] -C feeds/packages/net/bmon compile
make[3] -C package/network/utils/iptables compile
make[3]
I’m looking at a configure.ac which is trying to detect if the platform has
snprintf() or not, and it’s generating the wrong results. Ditto for strip().
In configure.ac:
dnl Checks for library functions.
AC_PROG_GCC_TRADITIONAL
AC_TYPE_SIGNAL
AC_CHECK_FUNCS(select socket strdup strerror strtol
Hi.
I’m working on a project where I need to be able to force certain kernel
configuration parameters from a script, to automate building tailored kernels
for performance testing, certification, etc.
I love the way that I can use “scripts/diffconfig.sh” to save the deltas into a
file… update t
One thing I was wondering about was, on a headless system, but that does have
an LCD display, is maybe capturing the progress of procd as it runs and
displaying it on that LCD.
Looking at /var/log/messages, I see:
2017-02-12T05:49:52+00:00 Powercode kernel:4.660666] procd: - early -
2017-02
> On Feb 12, 2017, at 10:04 PM, Yousong Zhou wrote:
>
> On 13 February 2017 at 11:23, Philip Prindeville
> wrote:
>>
>>> On Feb 11, 2017, at 8:29 PM, David Lang wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, 11 Feb 2017, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>>>
>&g
> On Feb 14, 2017, at 2:45 AM, Petr Štetiar wrote:
>
> Philip Prindeville [2017-02-12 12:57:19]:
>
> Hi,
>
>> One thing I was wondering about was, on a headless system, but that does
>> have an LCD display, is maybe capturing the progress of procd as it runs an
> On Feb 13, 2017, at 11:25 PM, Yousong Zhou wrote:
>
> On 14 February 2017 at 10:51, Philip Prindeville
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Yousong,
>>
>> I’ve been working on both OpenWRT and LEDE and needed to get some hooks
>> working in OpenWRT so I focused on
Hi,
Has anyone managed to use kdump with OpenWRT/LEDE?
I have a box which periodically panics, and since /var is a link to /tmp/ there
are no persistent logs. Which reminds me: is it safe to configure a third
partition on my CF card, format it as ext3, and mount that as /var/log in
/etc/fstab
project/source/blob/master/target/linux/generic/patches-4.9/930-crashlog.patch
>
>
> Best Regards,
> Syrone Wong
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 10:05 AM, Philip Prindeville
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Has anyone managed to use kdump with OpenWRT/LEDE?
>>
at 10:27 AM, Philip Prindeville
> wrote:
>
> Thanks for that.
>
>
>> On Feb 22, 2017, at 11:44 PM, Syrone Wong wrote:
>>
>> According to LEDE's source code:
>>
>> config KERNEL_CRASHLOG
>> bool "Crash logging"
>> depe
s disabled by default. You may want to enable it yourself. I
> don't know why.
>
>
> Best Regards,
> Syrone Wong
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 2:31 PM, Philip Prindeville
> wrote:
>> I built an x86_64 image and turned on crash logging, and then forced a crash
> On May 8, 2017, at 7:29 AM, David Woodhouse wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2017-05-08 at 15:19 +0200, John Crispin wrote:
>>
>> *) mailing list
>> - ask david to add the openwrt-adm and openwrt lists
>> - announce the switch to the infradead serves, asking people to
>> unsubscribe if they have privacy i
> On May 8, 2017, at 7:19 AM, John Crispin wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Felix, Imre and myself had 2 calls last week lasting several hours and
> discussed the following proposal of conditions for a remerge that we would
> like to propose and have people vote on.
>
> *) branding
> - the owrt side sees
> On May 11, 2017, at 4:53 AM, Stijn Segers
> wrote:
>
> Some of the OpenWrt veterans come across as if they want the re-merge to be
> rushed, ignoring the actual issues that caused the fork in the first place.
Yeah, I have to agree with this. You don’t get married, then define your vows
a
1 - 100 of 908 matches
Mail list logo
