Surprised (after what you said) that it was accepted that quickly.  Had the 
impression that things were slow.

Go ahead for now, unless you think the upstream release is imminent.



> On Feb 14, 2021, at 3:26 PM, Ilya Lipnitskiy <ilya.lipnits...@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> Oh well, it is too late now - it's been merged upstream:
> https://salsa.debian.org/clint/fakeroot/-/commits/upstream/
> 
> No release yet, though. Do you want me to do another patch, getting
> rid of the upstreamed patches and using PKG_SOURCE_VERSION?
> 
> Ilya
> 
> 
> Ilya
> 
> On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 12:25 PM Philip Prindeville
> <philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Inline....
>> 
>> 
>>> On Feb 13, 2021, at 9:41 PM, Ilya Lipnitskiy <ilya.lipnits...@gmail.com> 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> The following commit removed _STAT_VER definitions from glibc:
>>> https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=8ed005daf0ab03e142500324a34087ce179ae78e
>>> 
>>> That subsequently broke fakeroot:
>>> https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/69572
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889862#c13
>>> https://forum.openwrt.org/t/unable-to-build-toolchain-fakeroot-fails-perhaps-others-after-it/87966
>>> 
>>> Make the patch based on Jan Pazdziora's suggestion from here:
>>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/de...@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/SMQ3RYXEYTVZH6PLQMKNB3NM4XLPMNZO/
>>> 
>>> Add wrappers for newly exported symbols in glibc.
>>> 
>>> Apply patch from Debian to fix warnings in fts_read and fts_children:
>>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=676428
>>> https://sources.debian.org/patches/fakeroot/1.25.3-1.1/eglibc-fts-without-LFS/
>>> 
>>> Fix __xmknod{,at} dev pointer argument. Switch default to assume * and
>>> not the absence of *. On glibc 2.33+, there is no definition for these
>>> functions in header files, so the compile test doesn't work. But, we
>>> can default to using the pointer (as is the case with newer glibc), and
>>> use the header file on older platforms to fail the test and use no pointer.
>>> 
>>> Tested on my x86_64 Arch Linux machine, fakeroot unit tests pass.
>>> Also tested by building various .ipks and examining the tar contents, to
>>> ensure that the owner uid/gid was 0/0.
>>> 
>>> Signed-off-by: Ilya Lipnitskiy <ilya.lipnits...@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>> .../300-glibc-2.33-compatibility.patch        | 145 ++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 145 insertions(+)
>>> create mode 100644 tools/fakeroot/patches/300-glibc-2.33-compatibility.patch
>>> 
>>> diff --git a/tools/fakeroot/patches/300-glibc-2.33-compatibility.patch 
>>> b/tools/fakeroot/patches/300-glibc-2.33-compatibility.patch
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 0000000000..a460cace0c
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/tools/fakeroot/patches/300-glibc-2.33-compatibility.patch
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,145 @@
>>> +--- a/libfakeroot.c
>>> ++++ b/libfakeroot.c
>>> +@@ -90,6 +90,16 @@
>>> + #define SEND_GET_XATTR64(a,b,c) send_get_xattr64(a,b)
>>> + #endif
>>> +
>>> ++#ifndef _STAT_VER
>>> ++ #if defined (__aarch64__)
>>> ++  #define _STAT_VER 0
>>> ++ #elif defined (__x86_64__)
>>> ++  #define _STAT_VER 1
>>> ++ #else
>>> ++  #define _STAT_VER 3
>>> ++ #endif
>>> ++#endif
>>> ++
>>> + /*
>>> +    These INT_* (which stands for internal) macros should always be used 
>>> when
>>> +    the fakeroot library owns the storage of the stat variable.
>>> +@@ -1358,6 +1368,54 @@ int renameat(int olddir_fd, const char *
>>> + #endif /* HAVE_FSTATAT */
>>> +
>>> +
>>> ++#if defined(__GLIBC__) && __GLIBC_PREREQ(2,33)
>>> ++/* Glibc 2.33 exports symbols for these functions in the shared lib */
>>> ++  int lstat(const char *file_name, struct stat *statbuf) {
>>> ++     return WRAP_LSTAT LSTAT_ARG(_STAT_VER, file_name, statbuf);
>>> ++  }
>> 
>> 
>> Sorry, was suggesting that the # lines be indented, not necessary function 
>> definitions.
>> 
>> Thanks
>> 
>> 
>>> ++  int stat(const char *file_name, struct stat *st) {
>>> ++     return WRAP_STAT STAT_ARG(_STAT_VER, file_name, st);
>>> ++  }
>>> ++  int fstat(int fd, struct stat *st) {
>>> ++     return WRAP_FSTAT FSTAT_ARG(_STAT_VER, fd, st);
>>> ++  }
>>> ++
>>> ++  #ifdef HAVE_FSTATAT
>>> ++    int fstatat(int dir_fd, const char *path, struct stat *st, int flags) 
>>> {
>>> ++       return WRAP_FSTATAT FSTATAT_ARG(_STAT_VER, dir_fd, path, st, 
>>> flags);
>>> ++    }
>>> ++  #endif
>>> ++
>>> ++  #ifdef STAT64_SUPPORT
>>> ++    int lstat64(const char *file_name, struct stat64 *st) {
>>> ++       return WRAP_LSTAT64 LSTAT64_ARG(_STAT_VER, file_name, st);
>>> ++    }
>>> ++    int stat64(const char *file_name, struct stat64 *st) {
>>> ++       return WRAP_STAT64 STAT64_ARG(_STAT_VER, file_name, st);
>>> ++    }
>>> ++    int fstat64(int fd, struct stat64 *st) {
>>> ++       return WRAP_FSTAT64 FSTAT64_ARG(_STAT_VER, fd, st);
>>> ++    }
>>> ++
>>> ++    #ifdef HAVE_FSTATAT
>>> ++      int fstatat64(int dir_fd, const char *path, struct stat64 *st, int 
>>> flags) {
>>> ++     return WRAP_FSTATAT64 FSTATAT64_ARG(_STAT_VER, dir_fd, path, st, 
>>> flags);
>>> ++      }
>>> ++    #endif
>>> ++  #endif
>>> ++
>>> ++  int mknod(const char *pathname, mode_t mode, dev_t dev) {
>>> ++     return WRAP_MKNOD MKNOD_ARG(_STAT_VER, pathname, mode, &dev);
>>> ++  }
>>> ++
>>> ++  #if defined(HAVE_FSTATAT) && defined(HAVE_MKNODAT)
>>> ++    int mknodat(int dir_fd, const char *pathname, mode_t mode, dev_t dev) 
>>> {
>>> ++       return WRAP_MKNODAT MKNODAT_ARG(_STAT_VER, dir_fd, pathname, mode, 
>>> &dev);
>>> ++    }
>>> ++  #endif
>>> ++#endif /* GLIBC_PREREQ */
>>> ++
>>> ++
>>> + #ifdef FAKEROOT_FAKENET
>>> + pid_t fork(void)
>>> + {
>>> +@@ -2024,11 +2082,7 @@ FTSENT *fts_read(FTS *ftsp) {
>>> +             || r->fts_info == FTS_NS || r->fts_info == FTS_NSOK))
>>> +     r->fts_statp = NULL;  /* Otherwise fts_statp may be a random pointer 
>>> */
>>> +   if(r && r->fts_statp) {  /* Should we bother checking fts_info here? */
>>> +-# if defined(STAT64_SUPPORT) && !defined(__APPLE__)
>>> +-    SEND_GET_STAT64(r->fts_statp, _STAT_VER);
>>> +-# else
>>> +     SEND_GET_STAT(r->fts_statp, _STAT_VER);
>>> +-# endif
>>> +   }
>>> +
>>> +   return r;
>>> +@@ -2047,11 +2101,7 @@ FTSENT *fts_children(FTS *ftsp, int opti
>>> +   first=next_fts_children(ftsp, options);
>>> +   for(r = first; r; r = r->fts_link) {
>>> +     if(r && r->fts_statp) {  /* Should we bother checking fts_info here? 
>>> */
>>> +-# if defined(STAT64_SUPPORT) && !defined(__APPLE__)
>>> +-      SEND_GET_STAT64(r->fts_statp, _STAT_VER);
>>> +-# else
>>> +       SEND_GET_STAT(r->fts_statp, _STAT_VER);
>>> +-# endif
>>> +     }
>>> +   }
>>> +
>>> +@@ -2483,7 +2533,7 @@ int statx (int dirfd, const char *path,
>>> +
>>> + #ifdef LIBFAKEROOT_DEBUGGING
>>> +   if (fakeroot_debug) {
>>> +-    fprintf(stderr, "statx fd %d\n", fd);
>>> ++    fprintf(stderr, "statx fd %d\n", dirfd);
>>> +   }
>>> + #endif /* LIBFAKEROOT_DEBUGGING */
>>> +   r=INT_NEXT_FSTATAT(dirfd, path, &st, flags);
>>> +--- a/configure.ac
>>> ++++ b/configure.ac
>>> +@@ -184,13 +184,13 @@ AC_MSG_CHECKING([for type of arg of __xm
>>> +   ]], [[
>>> +        int __xmknod  ( int ver,
>>> +                        const char *pathname ,
>>> +-                       mode_t  mode ,  dev_t dev);
>>> ++                       mode_t  mode ,  dev_t *dev);
>>> +   ]])],[
>>> +-   AC_DEFINE(XMKNOD_FRTH_ARG,)
>>> +-   AC_MSG_RESULT([no extra *])
>>> +-  ],[
>>> +    AC_DEFINE(XMKNOD_FRTH_ARG,[*])
>>> +    AC_MSG_RESULT([needs *])
>>> ++  ],[
>>> ++   AC_DEFINE(XMKNOD_FRTH_ARG,)
>>> ++   AC_MSG_RESULT([no extra *])
>>> +
>>> +   ])
>>> +
>>> +@@ -211,13 +211,13 @@ AC_MSG_CHECKING([for type of arg of __xm
>>> +        int __xmknodat  ( int ver,
>>> +                          int dirfd,
>>> +                          const char *pathname ,
>>> +-                         mode_t  mode ,  dev_t dev);
>>> ++                         mode_t  mode ,  dev_t *dev);
>>> +   ]])],[
>>> +-   AC_DEFINE(XMKNODAT_FIFTH_ARG,)
>>> +-   AC_MSG_RESULT([no extra *])
>>> +-  ],[
>>> +    AC_DEFINE(XMKNODAT_FIFTH_ARG,[*])
>>> +    AC_MSG_RESULT([needs *])
>>> ++  ],[
>>> ++   AC_DEFINE(XMKNODAT_FIFTH_ARG,)
>>> ++   AC_MSG_RESULT([no extra *])
>>> +
>>> +   ])
>>> +
>>> --
>>> 2.30.1
>>> 
>> 


_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Reply via email to