yet?
thanks alot , bud
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Which leaves my 3rd question. Should I rather post them here or on the website
trac? Is one prefered to the other?
.. Bud
Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 19:38, Bud wrote:
>> I just read on
>> https://dev.openwrt.org/wiki/SubmittingPatches
>>
>
just checked .. I've got a new package under trunk/package/fuse24
a 'svn diff' ignores it. a 'svn diff package/fuse24' says it's not version
controlled.
that's why I tar gz'd it and upped it to trac ...
what to do? ... bud
_
makes sense... I'll add the new resources to the local svn then and submit the
patches here. I am curious how it goes .. bud
Hamish Guthrie wrote:
> Hi Bud,
>
>> Which leaves my 3rd question. Should I rather post them here or on the
>> website trac? Is one prefered to
-fuse
from the new fuse24 package.
Signed-off-by: Bud
Index: package/fuse/Makefile
===
--- package/fuse/Makefile (Revision 16273)
+++ package/fuse/Makefile (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
#
-# Copyright (C) 2006-2008
The package had massive changes lately and is very much improved now.
This compiles under kernel 2.4 and 2.6 and recent buildroot/trunk flawlessly.
With 2.4 an older fuse kmod is needed. I set that up in buildroot.
see https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/5186
Signed-off-by: Bud
Index: feeds
the definition suggested seems not to change the postinst script in ipkg/CONTROL
anything different if it is a kmod only package?
pls see attached Makefile
thanks bud
--
> Le Thursday 04 June 2009 17:23:20 bud.d...@suisse.org, vous avez écrit :
>> I currently play around with sshfs a
the patch in further
detail.
I want to deliver those. Again.
@Florian,jow .. anybody mind to integrate them this time?
regards bud
PS: next I'll work on truecrypt on brcm 2.4/2.6 .. anybody ever worked on it?
Btw. I already know it's gonna be sl
the tickets
fuse24 init script
https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/5349
filesystem category house keeping + owfs update to 2.7p21
https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/5352
are still open
please check in ..thanks bud
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt
Could you quote an example or deliver an exploit?
thanks bud
> Hi!
>
>> The correct syntax is [ -n "${var}" ] (notice the quotes).
>> Thanks to Vasilis.
>
> A security notice:
> Don't use more then one expression in one test call.
> Use instant tw
ould be..
if [ ! -z "$do_login" -a "$user" == 'foo' -a "$password" == 'bar' ]; then
echo login success
else
echo login failed
fi
and this wouldn't be flawed by the error. I am still not sure, if this is meant
to be.
@Alina: Do you have rea
> I too still fail to see what's the actual problem. The test utility does
> exactly what it's supposed to do.
>
in this case
[ -z "=" ] shouldn't result in ./test.sh: line 6: [: too many arguments
apart from this
#x27;t implement a shell
> interpreter, that is compatible with the current syntax and don't have the
> Problem, that you can inject a expression with the value argument. It's like
> strcpy() in C.
>
Sorry I only see that test obviously handles one and the same situation
di
to find out what expression do you want. The bash, dash and
> BusyBox ash do so.
>
Thanks for explaining.. this makes perfectly sense and would be right if the
metacharacter hadn't been enclosed in quotes. This should help the interpreter
on its feet again.. shouldn't it?
..
Q2: I have no echo since two days. Does somebody actively monitor the
tickets?
.. regards bud
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
archive.
Any ideas?
All I know the commandline would be 'mknod /dev/fuse -m 0666 c 10 229'
Thx in advance .. bud
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
on kernel 2.4 with the fuse 2.5.3 kernel module it isn't ... I'll
doublecheck with kernel 2.6 fuse 2.7.4 tonight ... bud
Le Thursday 04 June 2009 17:23:20 bud.d...@suisse.org, vous avez écrit :
I currently play around with sshfs and it was missing the kernel fuse
module (so it
he Makefile.
.. Bud
the definition suggested seems not to change the postinst script in ipkg/CONTROL
anything different if it is a kmod only package?
pls see attached Makefile
thanks bud
--
Le Thursday 04 June 2009 17:23:20 bud.d...@suisse.org, vous avez écrit :
I currently play
what are the size differences? did you try it out?
bud
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Thanks for pointing out ... bud
Hi,
Since changesets 16606 and 16607 we have switched to using software floating
point emulation in the toolchain and we disabled the in-kernel FPU Emulator
in the MIPS kernel by default.
The rationale behind this is :
- the FPU emulator of the kernel is slow
really well explained problems and solutions. thanks for the link .. bud
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
$(call
CompareKernelPatchVer,$(KERNEL_PATCHVER),lt,2.6.25)),1)
Maybe it's time to disable the module by default without condition. It's
part of the kernel and maintained there. Does current buildroot support
kernel 2.6 younger than patchversion 14?
... bud
hi,
the fuse package doe
just out of interest.
I see options in menuconfig to change the gcc version and others but ís
the used kernel version configurable?
thx bud
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo
I'll change that and send the patch next week to the list.
... bud
bud.d...@suisse.org wrote:
Are you sure that it compiles with< 2.6.27 ? Did you try?
no :-)
i was only conservative and thought that it just broke recently.
Maybe it's time to disable the module by de
... the patch is attached to the ticket
https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/5584
The package didn't build because it failed to build the obsolete fuse
module of the package. The patch disables the module building and
updates the Makefile comments accordingly.
.. thank
is there a reason why the
https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?id=9653
is not in the buildroot?
From my tests it is faster and more compatible than the current
'package/broadcom-mmc'.
... bud
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
ope
t to replace the jffs partition with the ext3 on an usb stick
during boot on brcm-2.4. Any help appreciated :)
Thanks a lot ..bud
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
usb/mmc if exists)
... could anybody offer some help? I am really not experienced in the
matter, but I am definitely interested in improving the situation. The
result should be a switch on/works solution without fiddling the start
scripts.
.. bud
On 19.08.2009 16:23, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
On
ssume 0x80 could be
given.
Easier of course would be raising the default limit.
Opinions? ..Bud
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
getting timeouts, anybody else experiencing this?
..bud
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
?
thanks for the hint .. bud
On 23.08.2009 17:53, Nils Toedtmann wrote:
Imre Kaloz wrote:
On 2009.08.23. 09:55:12 Benjamin Henrion wrote:
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 5:00 AM, wrote:
getting timeouts, anybody else experiencing this?
Time for mirrors...
Time
"208.67.222.222 208.67.220.220"
save the file then run
/etc/rc.d/S60dnsmasq restart
check resolv.conf
r...@openwrt:/etc/rc.d# cat /etc/resolv.conf
nameserver 208.67.222.222
nameserver 208.67.220.220
nameserver 127.0.0.1
... bud
On 23.08.2009 18:43, Steven Van Ingelgem wrote:
ste...@
No it doesn't .. it's probably the old dns entry still cached in your
(providers) dns system ...
You can use opendns to to workaround ... bud
On 23.08.2009 19:06, Daniel Lenski wrote:
On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 20:14:54 +0200, ulf kypke wrote:
hi http://downloads.openwrt.org/ is sendin
nslookup openwrt.org 208.67.222.222
Server: resolver1.opendns.com
Address: 208.67.222.222
Name:openwrt.org
Address: 78.24.191.177
regards .. bud
On 23.08.2009 10:36, MichelinoK wrote:
i have the same problem...they've changed the ip of openwrt.org so we have
to wait for th
age:
- one concept for all external media providing root filespaces
.. thx bud
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
it is for kernel
2.4 broadcom only.
Is there interest to integrate it in buildroot? I contacted the original
author and he would like it.
.. bud
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listin
s (I suspect it
wouldn't be as soon, so my solution could be viewed as an at least
interim solution).
@Felix: Are you reading? Any news on this topic?
Is there aufs available in trunk? Couldn't find a package, seems not to
be part of the kernel also ...
Thanks ..bud
___
As announced the new package broadcom-sdhc. I created a enhancement
ticket here
https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/6343
Please add it to trunk and remove broadcom-mmc, which is then obsolete.
Thanks bud
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel
the brcm-2.4 sdhc driver is also still pending
https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/6343
.. thanks bud
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
it doesn't .. actually it is installed by opkg as it should be with 644
.. my friday bug, see attachment .. thanks
btw. I am right now updating ntfs-3g and fuse .. if everything goes well
I'll send them next week.
bud
On 18.12.2009 22:00, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
-BEGIN
, maillist link
Low
1 feature request x, ticketno 3456
2 feature request y, ticketno 1234
Of course this has to be moderated. But one dedicated moderator and one
developer working the list could be a start.
.. bud
Original Message
Subject: [OpenWrt-Devel] broadcom-mmc r
Thanks a lot. What about the open actions list.. any comments?
Regarding testers: I will put a request/announcement in the forum as
soon the module is in the trunk. I myself am using it for months now and
discovered no problems.
bud
On 16.01.2010 15:19, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
-BEGIN
cause its gpio lane
is used.
.. I also agree, let's put it to trunk and wait, if somebody complains,
especially as this is not totally new, but based on work already in trunk.
.. bud
On 16.01.2010 19:36, Spudz76 wrote:
I have an MMC-over-GPIO enabled Broadcom but I can't get it t
the attached patch bumps ntfs-3g to the latest version. menuconfig
integration has been slightly modified. Also new:
- package ntfs-3g now also contains the ntfs-3g.probe binary
- new subpackage called ntfs-3g-utils contains ntfs-3g.{usermap,secaudit}
Tested on brcm-2.4 and brcm-47xx.
.. bud
last because I plan to enable swapfile support, which rely on
the filesystem to be mounted first. Any idea for a swapfile name?
/swapfile, /swap.swp ...
Any comments? .. bud
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https
What do I have to do to get these updated packages into the stable
kamikaze branch? Fuse on brcm-2.4 and brcm-47xx is broken without the
DCACHE BUG patch in trunk.
thanks bud
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https
t meant to be. How can I see all variables of make that are currently set?
Where did you find the PKG_INSTALL switch?
... bud
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
cement at [2] that
> adds swap support to the hotplug scripts.
this is why I initially came to the idea. I don't like the idea to put
every special case in one mount script.
..bud
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
? comments? .. bud
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
d actual documentation, would have been too
nice .. nice finding still. I'll modify the upcoming fuse-2.8.2 accordingly.
.. bud
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
nually to the make parameters. But you deleted the parameter
with your patch.
I guess the parameter is used during compiling and not with install.
check include/package-defaults.mk .. it really clears up things.
bud
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openw
.
in 2.0.3 there were some fixes you will find documented in the readme
file. Also is the sourcecode included as it is not actively developed
anymore by the author and nobody knows for how long the package will be
available there.
.. bud
___
openwrt-devel
and understood he would like it in
buildroot but wouldn't have the time to bugfix and integrate and that he
would like me to do it.
i will clear matters up with him and report back. the package right now
will work but lacks the root overlay feature i added.
bud
in my post for testers some people answered. Maybe somebody volunteers
if you ask there or post a topic yourself?
https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?pid=100795
bud
On 20.02.2010 20:25, Spudz76 wrote:
> I am also still working on the expanded version, as time permits, to
> support
i have an update for fuse in the pipeline. it will obsolete fuse24 and
bump fuse to the latest version. it should build fine parallel. but who
knows, could you please doublecheck as soon as i posted it?
therefor i unfortunately also ask to suppend the fuse and fuse24 patches.
thanks bud
On
find attached the announced patch for fuse.
changes:
- latest fuse 2.8.3
- includes now the kernel module for kernel 2.4
- builds parallel
- fuse-utils includes now ulockmgr_server
fuse24 should be deleted from trunk.
bud
Index: package/fuse/patches/102-no_depmod.patch
which uClibc version are currently used?
if i interpret toolchain/uClibc/Makefile correctly only
0.9.30-git
0.9.30.1
0.9.30.2
0.9.30.3
is this correct or are there still older version used elsewhere?
thanks bud
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt
57 matches
Mail list logo
