On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Tomislav Požega
wrote:
> thomson usually sticks with crappy broadcom so don't give much hope for
> AR9271..
It's a Ralink RT3070 it seems!
The console log is here: http://pastebin.com/LCf2rFCv
I didn't take it from my device as I'm having problems with the seria
Hi,
Well, if boot loader is not supported you have 2 choices:
1. Leave it
2. Make boot loader supported with some hard work :)
The devices in linux based so there should be some way...
Regards,
Jacek
On 18.10.2013 10:13, Marco Antonio Mauro wrote:
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Tomislav Pože
I've been working with someone with a similar one myself the ZTE ZXV10
H108L router modem from Wind Hellas, it has a u-boot bootloader and runs
linux. http://pastebin.com/EXzrEwfE is the serial log and
http://pastebin.com/H5nbgr3i is printenv, I have issued a GPL source code
request to the operator
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Jacek Kikiewicz wrote:
> Well, if boot loader is not supported you have 2 choices:
> 1. Leave it
> 2. Make boot loader supported with some hard work :)
3. replace bootloader with uboot?
Anyways internal pictures are here.
https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/
On 18.10.2013 10:22, Marco Antonio Mauro wrote:
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Jacek Kikiewicz wrote:
Well, if boot loader is not supported you have 2 choices:
1. Leave it
2. Make boot loader supported with some hard work :)
3. replace bootloader with uboot?
Anyways internal pictures are
What ISP is this issued by? Do you have a link to this modem on their
website?
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 3:25 AM, Jacek Kikiewicz wrote:
>
> On 18.10.2013 10:22, Marco Antonio Mauro wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Jacek Kikiewicz wrote:
>>
>>> Well, if boot loader is not supported
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 10:37 AM, James Hilliard
wrote:
> What ISP is this issued by? Do you have a link to this modem on their
> website?
Tiscali Italy
http://assistenza.tiscali.it/tecnica/adsl/configurazioni/thomson_tg585v8/
This is the support page, in Italian.
--
Marcus905
GPG pubkey:
htt
Both Allnet and OpenMesh sysupgrade uses fw_setenv from uboot-envtools to
change different settings in the uboot environment. uboot-envtools version
2013.01 introduced a filesystem lock "/var/lock/fw_printenv.lock" to guarantee
mutually exclusive access to the uboot environment. But the path /var d
On Thursday 17 October 2013 16:12:27 Daniel Golle wrote:
> Hi Sven,
>
> thank you for addressing that issue!
>
> On 10/17/2013 06:42 PM, Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> > diff --git a/target/linux/ar71xx/base-files/lib/upgrade/allnet.sh
> > b/target/linux/ar71xx/base-files/lib/upgrade/allnet.sh index
> >
Does the software appear to be customized at all for the ISP or does it
seem to be generic? I am going to issue a GPL source code request and want
to make sure it reaches the right company. There appears to be incomplete
source code listed on this website that was formally Thomson
http://www3.techn
Take a look at this ticket: https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/9631
- Original Message -
From: Weedy
To: OpenWrt Development List
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2013 1:02 AM
Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Quick hack for kernel entropy problem on MIPS
On 17 Oct 2013 13:07, "chrono" wr
Do I need to submit everything all at once or can I add things slowly so I
can confirm all components are in compliance with openwrt formatting etc?
The first thing to do would be to revert the removal of the ubicom32
platform here https://dev.openwrt.org/wiki/ubicom32, from there I can work
on int
On Oct 18, 2013 1:00 PM, "James Hilliard" wrote:
>
> Does the software appear to be customized at all for the ISP or does it
seem to be generic?
I'm not home at the moment so I cannot grab you some screenshots, but the
interface is exactly the same as the one here taken from my ISP's website:
ht
Applied in r38445 - thanks!
~ Jow
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Applied in r38446 - thanks!
~ Jow
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Applied in r38447 - thanks!
~ Jow
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Applied in r38448 - thanks!
~ Jow
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Applied in r38449 - thanks!
~ Jow
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Applied in r38450 - thanks!
~ Jow
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Applied in r38451 - thanks!
~ Jow
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Applied in r38413 - thanks!
~ Jow
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
On 18/10/13 07:09 AM, José Vázquez Fernández wrote:
> Take a look at this ticket: https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/9631
Again, I do not personally have this issue but I can see why it would
need to be fixed.
$ ssh r...@openwrt.lan 'reboot';sleep 3;while ! ping -c3 openwrt.lan; do
sleep 2; done; ssh
Hi,
> This is the wiki page in question:
> http://wiki.openwrt.org/toh/openmesh/om2p#upgrading.openwrt
>
> Thank you for clarifying that sysupgrade does work!
if the sysupgrade works to your satisfaction would you mind updating that
section in the wiki ? It might spare the next person some has
Ok, i'm going to contact the manufacturer directly then and see what they
say.
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 6:17 AM, Marco Antonio Mauro wrote:
>
> On Oct 18, 2013 1:00 PM, "James Hilliard"
> wrote:
> >
> > Does the software appear to be customized at all for the ISP or does it
> seem to be generic?
24 matches
Mail list logo
