Do I need to submit everything all at once or can I add things slowly so I can confirm all components are in compliance with openwrt formatting etc? The first thing to do would be to revert the removal of the ubicom32 platform here https://dev.openwrt.org/wiki/ubicom32, from there I can work on integrating the device specific patches. Should I submit a patch for that removal?
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 6:50 AM, James Hilliard <james.hillia...@gmail.com>wrote: > So, I think i more or less got the boot processes down, however I don't > have hardware with me right now. Boot goes from ultra>uboot>linux more or > less. From the looks of it getting a console on uboot should be fairly > straight forward. I'm going to attempt to compile an oem build with the > uboot console enabled that way we can debug and flash over Ethernet instead > of serial. Msg me on gtalk and ill send you some builds(this email). > > > On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 2:04 AM, michal-osowie...@o2.pl < > michal-osowie...@o2.pl> wrote: > >> Hi James >> AFAIR dir-657 soucecode has openwrt's port which compiles but has no >> ethernet switch enabled/ported. I's hard to test develop anything without >> flash programmer so i dropped testing. It would be nice if you could add >> this model to your work >> >> Thanks, >> Michal >> >> >> Dnia 16 października 2013 20:53 James Hilliard <james.hillia...@gmail.com> >> napisał(a): >> >> > I think i'll attempt to support this and get some >> vendor/deviceconfigs integrated, can the changes that removed arch support >> bereverted easily in trunk? I've been working off of 12.09 here >> https://github.com/Lightsword1942/openwrtubicom and manually merging >> some things let me know if you have anysuggestions. I'm not sure what >> this is using for include/siteand that's what I'm currently hung up >> on. >> > On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 6:11 AM, Florian Fainelli <f.faine...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > Hello, >> > 2013/9/16 James Hilliard <james.hillia...@gmail.com>: >> > > Anyone interested in OpenWRT on Ubicom? They used OpenWRTinternally so >> > > there is already source ready(may be a little outdatedthough). Also >> have >> > > some router specific sources of both it and stock. >> > OpenWrt did "support" the ubicom32 architecture for awhile, but since >> > this is a very quirky architecture and nobody could step up as a >> > maintainer, it got removed. Unless you are willing to support that >> > architecture, I see no point in supporting it since it reallyrequired >> > a lot of quirks (special "hypervisor" software,bootloader and !MMU). >> > -- >> > Florian >> > _______________________________________________ >> > openwrt-devel mailing list >> > openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org >> > https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > openwrt-devel mailing list >> > openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org >> > https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel >> > >> > >
_______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
