2011/3/28 Felix Fietkau :
> On 2011-03-28 1:40 PM, Paweł Foremski wrote:
>> Last week ath9k updates broke adhoc. I'm running todays trunk on
>> RB433AH + RB52n. From
>> what I can see, beacons don't fly in adhoc. AP looks OK and
>> association is possible.
>
> You're running AP and Ad-Hoc on one in
On Tuesday 29 March 2011 20:34:12 Layne Edwards wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 19:08:22 +0200, Gabor Juhos
>
> wrote:
> > 2011.03.29. 18:44 keltezéssel, Layne Edwards írta:
> >> On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 17:30:21 +0200, Jochen Friedrich
> >>
> >> wrote:
> IMHO, it doesn't matter how patches are
> I would like to suggest that everyone joins -devel on irc this next
> sunday at 19:00 UTC to discuss the topic.
IRC meetings are good, but I think what is missing in this community
is some meetup face to face. I think when people know each other
directly then is much easier to understand each ot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thanks for the patches, I'll take a look at them shortly.
~ Jow
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk2S6hIACgkQdputYINPTPNKbgCcCNH/XXkO4JapQxGrZ
On Wednesday 30 March 2011, Yeoh Chun Yeow wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Any one has tried the patch from Peter Lebbing on VLAN tag on UBNT
> RouterStation platform and get it work properly.
>
> Regards,
> Chun Yeow
I am afraid that I have difficulty building the kernel to try it on
an ADM6996FC (on th
can you post a link to the patch ?
On 30/03/11 10:34, David Goodenough wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 March 2011, Yeoh Chun Yeow wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> Any one has tried the patch from Peter Lebbing on VLAN tag on UBNT
>> RouterStation platform and get it work properly.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Chun Yeow
>
> Of course I don't claim this should be often, because I would be
> impossible, we come from the all world. But I think it would be good
> for example to have a face to face meeting of OpenWRT developers this
> summer, maybe at the CCC Camping ? What you think ? :)
>
i think that sleeping out
On Wednesday 30 March 2011 10:28:56 ZioPRoTo (Saverio Proto) wrote:
> > I would like to suggest that everyone joins -devel on irc this next
> > sunday at 19:00 UTC to discuss the topic.
>
> IRC meetings are good, but I think what is missing in this community
> is some meetup face to face. I think
Its not on a web site, just in the archive of this mail-list.
David
On Wednesday 30 March 2011, John Crispin wrote:
> can you post a link to the patch ?
>
> On 30/03/11 10:34, David Goodenough wrote:
> > On Wednesday 30 March 2011, Yeoh Chun Yeow wrote:
> >> Dear all,
> >>
> >> Any one has trie
yes and the archive can be linked to :)
On 30/03/11 10:51, David Goodenough wrote:
> Its not on a web site, just in the archive of this mail-list.
>
> David
>
> On Wednesday 30 March 2011, John Crispin wrote:
>> can you post a link to the patch ?
>>
>> On 30/03/11 10:34, David Goodenough wrote:
https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2011-January/009100.html
this is assume
On 30/03/11 10:55, John Crispin wrote:
> yes and the archive can be linked to :)
>
> On 30/03/11 10:51, David Goodenough wrote:
>> Its not on a web site, just in the archive of this mail-list.
>>
>> David
>
On Wednesday 30 March 2011 10:41:10 John Crispin wrote:
> can you post a link to the patch ?
Thread starts here:
https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2011-January/009100.html
--
Florian
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.ope
Hello.
There is an RFC-TO-BE that describes requirements for IPv6 CPE routers,
that OpenWRT should sooner or later follow.
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-cpe-router-09
Some of those requirements should be satisfied by particular programmes
like radvd (or at least implementing t
update linux to 2.6.37.6
diff --git a/include/kernel-version.mk b/include/kernel-version.mk
index ae82a5d..4f204ac 100644
--- a/include/kernel-version.mk
+++ b/include/kernel-version.mk
@@ -20,8 +20,8 @@ endif
ifeq ($(LINUX_VERSION),2.6.36.4)
LINUX_KERNEL_MD5SUM:=c05dd941d0e249695e9f7256e1b
On 2011-03-30 9:10 AM, Paweł Foremski wrote:
2011/3/28 Felix Fietkau:
On 2011-03-28 1:40 PM, Paweł Foremski wrote:
Last week ath9k updates broke adhoc. I'm running todays trunk on
RB433AH + RB52n. From
what I can see, beacons don't fly in adhoc. AP looks OK and
association is possible.
dont apply this patch i still get a compile error after i did a make
target/linux/clean
failure is:
ERROR: "crypto_alloc_ahash" [crypto/ocf/cryptosoft.ko] undefined!
ERROR: "crypto_alloc_ablkcipher" [crypto/ocf/cryptosoft.ko] undefined!
ERROR: "crypto_ahash_digest" [crypto/ocf/cryptosoft.ko
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 10:16:59 +0200, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 March 2011 20:34:12 Layne Edwards wrote:
>> On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 19:08:22 +0200, Gabor Juhos wrote:
>>> 2011.03.29. 18:44 keltezéssel, Layne Edwards írta:
On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 17:30:21 +0200, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
I am having the same error with 2.6.37.4 (for orion target).
The Makefile in the crypto dir seems to be broken...
It contains something like (from top of my head so don't shoot me if I
am wrong):
hash_objs += ahash.o
hash_objs += shash.o
But the hash_objs variable is never used...
A simple fi
Dear all,
I am able to get the patch works by adding the following in mach-ubnt.c:
ar71xx_eth1_data.phy_mask = UBNT_RS_LAN_PHYMASK
However, there is two issues here:
1. RouterStation has two ports on ETH1. One port can only be activated after
the other port is connected with cable. If this port
Hi,
interesting read, looks like they more or less mandate DHCPv6 (both
server and client). This slightly bothers me since the currently
available DHCPv6 server implementations are rather big and there are no
plans to support this protocol in dnsmasq.
The rest looks like it is doable, but not eve
On 2011-03-30 4:06 PM, Maarten Bezemer wrote:
I am having the same error with 2.6.37.4 (for orion target).
The Makefile in the crypto dir seems to be broken...
It contains something like (from top of my head so don't shoot me if I
am wrong):
hash_objs += ahash.o
hash_objs += shash.o
But t
Do you have a short list of the problem areas?
-K-
On 3/30/11 10:57 AM, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
Hi,
interesting read, looks like they more or less mandate DHCPv6 (both
server and client). This slightly bothers me since the currently
available DHCPv6 server implementations are rather big and the
Hi,
no I have no list yet but it boils down to the fact that the current
network and interface setup mechanisms are rather constrained, old and
inflexible.
Big problems are the lack of statefulness, the tendency for race
conditions, the inability to properly nest protocols and the limited
feature
W dniu 30 marca 2011 15:05 użytkownik Felix Fietkau napisał:
> On 2011-03-30 9:10 AM, Paweł Foremski wrote:
>>
>> 2011/3/28 Felix Fietkau:
>>>
>>> On 2011-03-28 1:40 PM, Paweł Foremski wrote:
Last week ath9k updates broke adhoc. I'm running todays trunk on
RB433AH + RB52n. From
>
В Wed, 30 Mar 2011 17:17:01 +0200
Jo-Philipp Wich пишет:
> Hi,
>
> no I have no list yet but it boils down to the fact that the current
> network and interface setup mechanisms are rather constrained, old and
> inflexible.
>
> Big problems are the lack of statefulness, the tendency for race
> c
On 2011-03-30 5:43 PM, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
В Wed, 30 Mar 2011 17:17:01 +0200
Jo-Philipp Wich пишет:
Hi,
no I have no list yet but it boils down to the fact that the current
network and interface setup mechanisms are rather constrained, old and
inflexible.
Big problems are the lack
commit 26375 fixes the compile error the attached patch works
Am Mittwoch, 30. März 2011, 17:07:33 schrieb Felix Fietkau:
> On 2011-03-30 4:06 PM, Maarten Bezemer wrote:
> > I am having the same error with 2.6.37.4 (for orion target).
> > The Makefile in the crypto dir seems to be broken...
>
Let me suggest that one likely design target will
be multi-link residential networks that probably
include energy management CPEs as well as one or
several 6LoWPANs. We must anticipate automated ULA
prefix delegation, etc. as well as the need for site-
local multicast. Here are a couple of relev
Hello,
After a recent upgrade to latest Backfire I bumped into an interesting
problem.
If a target has a /etc/config/fstab file in its base-files
(target/linux/$(TARGET)/base-files/etc/config/fstab) and has block-mount
as package enabled, it will get the fstab file from the block-mount
package in
Hello Saverio
Meeting in person is always good - I've had such things on my ongoing
agenda for several years, and experiences are good. When I travel I
always try to include meet-ups. But, not everyone is able to travel,
people involved/interested in OpenWrt are living across the globe. One
way to
Hello Bastian,
On Thursday 18 November 2010 10:58:20 Bastian Pranzas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this patch adds the package cgit, a cgi tool to browse git repositories.
Sorry for the late answer. This does not build for me:
mips-openwrt-linux-uclibc-gcc -o ui-repolist.o -c -Os -pipe -mips32 -
mtune=mips3
On Tuesday 29 March 2011 17:35:05 Etienne Champetier wrote:
> Hello
>
> This patch add uacctd, an ulog based accounting deamon from pmacct project
> (http://www.pmacct.net/) It also put all pmacct packages in a submenu
> called (13 packages)
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Signed-off-by: Etienne CHA
On Monday 07 March 2011 21:59:09 Roberto Riggio wrote:
> This patch adds a command line utility to interface with the WattsUp
> power meters (https://www.wattsupmeters.com/)
>
> Signed-off-by: Roberto Riggio
Applied in r26380, thanks!
--
Florian
___
ope
On Tuesday 29 March 2011 21:09:37 Philip Prindeville wrote:
> Flashrom looks for the MSR as /dev/cpu/%d/msr on an SMP box, but most
> embedded applications are UP. Patch the path accordingly.
>
> Also, 0.9.3 introduced a regression in how certain devices are erased.
> Revert to 0.9.1.
>
> Signed
On Wednesday 30 March 2011 08:21:05 Philip Prindeville wrote:
> The issue wasn't that flashrom-0.9.3 was broken, but that the incompatible
> device path put the box into a funky state that couldn't be reverted.
>
> This fix causes it to use the hotplug2 path.
>
> With this, we don't need to rever
On 3/30/11 2:12 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 March 2011 08:21:05 Philip Prindeville wrote:
>> The issue wasn't that flashrom-0.9.3 was broken, but that the incompatible
>> device path put the box into a funky state that couldn't be reverted.
>>
>> This fix causes it to use the hotp
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 17:07 +0200, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> On 2011-03-30 4:06 PM, Maarten Bezemer wrote:
> > I am having the same error with 2.6.37.4 (for orion target).
> > The Makefile in the crypto dir seems to be broken...
> >
> > It contains something like (from top of my head so don't shoot me
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 23:39 +0200, Maarten Bezemer wrote:
> by replacing 'crypto_hash-objs' to 'objs'.
'objs' should be 'objs-y' (of course)
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwr
did you fetch the newest trunk?
and
make target/linux/clean ; make oldconfig and then make?
Am Mittwoch, 30. März 2011, 23:59:33 schrieb Maarten Bezemer:
> On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 23:39 +0200, Maarten Bezemer wrote:
> > by replacing 'crypto_hash-objs' to 'objs'.
>
> 'objs' should be 'objs-y' (of c
Hi Philip,
Yeah, I wanted to ask about that... does anyone actually use udev with openwrt?
I do (or at least tried to and failed).
I failed to get udev to assign a static /dev/ttyUSBx file to a specific
USB device.
If this is possible with mdev/hotplug2, perhaps it needs to be documented.
I fetched the latest trunk (r26382).
I did not do a 'make target/linux/clean ; make oldconfig and then make',
but I deleted build_dir/linux-orion-generic before running make (after
updating to the latest trunk).
Maarten
On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 00:02 +0200, Peter Wagner wrote:
> did you fetch the ne
Committed revision 26386
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:52 AM, Roberto Riggio <
roberto.rig...@create-net.org> wrote:
>
> Upgrades the wing package to the latest version. The most important
> changes are:
>
> * revised implementation of the minstrel rate control algorithm
> * the openwrt makefile now
42 matches
Mail list logo
