В Wed, 30 Mar 2011 17:17:01 +0200 Jo-Philipp Wich <x...@subsignal.org> пишет:
> Hi, > > no I have no list yet but it boils down to the fact that the current > network and interface setup mechanisms are rather constrained, old and > inflexible. > > Big problems are the lack of statefulness, the tendency for race > conditions, the inability to properly nest protocols and the limited > featureset of the ash shell which will not allow for complex interface > operations like calculating ULAs etc. > > Felix has started working on netifd, which will at some point supersede > the current network setup scripts with an rpc capable daemon written in > C for better access to kernel APIs, ability to listen on netlink events etc. > > Once this is done, we can start to implement all the IPv6 requirements > in a clean way. Very interesting, but there are also projects like connman (connman.net) or network manager. I think the latter is bloated but the former is intended for embedded devices from the very beginning. What's wrong with connman? BTW, what's the difference between ubus and dbus? I didn't find any documentation... -- Alexander
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
