The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message ---
I know I’m a month late… things ha
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message ---
+1
But we need more options from
Hello again,
All additional votes are added to the wiki (thanks Petr) and I herewith
conclude this vote (again) on the 2025/03/18 or ~1742309611.
It’s (still) accepted and now even with all the perks of an absolute majority,
great!
While at it, I raise my personal wish again to rework the inac
On Wed, 2025-02-26 at 21:08 +, Paul Spooren wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> > starting a [VOTE] to get approval allowing me to begin the
> > development of OpenWrt "Two".
>
> This vote is open until the 05.03 (3 weeks total), if you’re a
> project member, please take part!.
Sorry, I'm constantly inunda
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message ---
Apologies for the late response.
T
Hi,
On 12-02-25, John Crispin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> starting a [VOTE] to get approval allowing me to begin the development of
> OpenWrt "Two".
Sorry for the late reply.
+1 for me, looks nice!
However, it's much more expensive than the One, so I hope we can keep
producing/supporting the One for peop
Hi,
Sorry for the late response,
+1 from me
Best regards,
Álvaro.
El mié, 12 feb 2025 a las 19:47, John Crispin () escribió:
>
> Hi,
>
> starting a [VOTE] to get approval allowing me to begin the development
> of OpenWrt "Two".
>
> "Two" will have all of the features that "One" has with the foll
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message ---
On 12/02/2025 19:44, John Crispin
Hi John,
+1 from me.
Keep up the great work.
Best
David
On 2/12/25 19:44, John Crispin wrote:
Hi,
starting a [VOTE] to get approval allowing me to begin the development of OpenWrt
"Two".
"Two" will have all of the features that "One" has with the following upgrades.
* MT7988
* 10G SFP
* 5
Hi,
I summed things up and this vote got accepted - surprise :)
https://openwrt.org/voting/2025-02-12-openwrt-two
All right John, please make this happen.
Best,
Paul
> On 26. Feb 2025, at 22:35, Rich Brown wrote:
>
> +1 Thank you.
>
>> On Feb 12, 2025, at 1:44 PM, John Crispin wrote:
>>
+1 Thank you.
> On Feb 12, 2025, at 1:44 PM, John Crispin wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> starting a [VOTE] to get approval allowing me to begin the development of
> OpenWrt "Two".
>
> "Two" will have all of the features that "One" has with the following
> upgrades.
>
> * MT7988
> * 10G SFP
> * 5G coppe
On 2/12/2025 1:44:58 PM, "John Crispin" wrote:
starting a [VOTE] to get approval allowing me to begin the development of OpenWrt
"Two".
+1 For me
/ted
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mai
On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 07:44:58PM +0100, John Crispin wrote:
> starting a [VOTE] to get approval allowing me to begin the development of
> OpenWrt "Two".
+1
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailma
Hi all,
> starting a [VOTE] to get approval allowing me to begin the development of
> OpenWrt "Two".
This vote is open until the 05.03 (3 weeks total), if you’re a project member,
please take part!.
I’ll conclude this vote on that day and add it to the wiki.
Sunshine,
Paul
signature.asc
Desc
John Crispin [2025-02-12 19:44:58]:
Hi,
thanks a lot for taking care of this!
> starting a [VOTE] to get approval allowing me to begin the development of
> OpenWrt "Two".
+1
Cheers,
Petr
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
openwrt-devel
Hi John,
starting a [VOTE] to get approval allowing me to begin the development
of OpenWrt "Two".
ACK from me - great to see you continue working on this!
Best,
Jo
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt
> * MT7988
> * 10G SFP
> * 5G copper
> * 4 port 2.5G copper
> * 1-2 port 1G copper
> * Tri-band Wi-Fi 7
>
> "Two" will be produced by GL.iNet and we are exploring options for US/EU
> based distribution.
>
> "Two" will (hopefully) be in the 250$ region with yet again a portion of
> that being do
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message ---
Agree, having 2x 10G would be nic
On 2025-02-13 03:44, John Crispin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> starting a [VOTE] to get approval allowing me to begin the development
> of OpenWrt "Two".
>
> "Two" will have all of the features that "One" has with the following
> upgrades.
>
> * MT7988
> * 10G SFP
> * 5G copper
> * 4 port 2.5G copper
> * 1-
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message ---
+1
On 2/12/25 7:44 PM, John Cris
Current hardware choice for Openwrt Two could provide 2x 10Gbps port but
it's using 1x10g+1x5g 5gbps is supported by less devices and more
expensive than 10g SFP. Also, we can get 4x 1g ports than 1 or 2 ports.
I don't think it's a good choice.
___
Il giorno mer 12 feb 2025 alle ore 19:46 John Crispin
ha scritto:
>
> Hi,
>
> starting a [VOTE] to get approval allowing me to begin the development
> of OpenWrt "Two".
>
> "Two" will have all of the features that "One" has with the following
> upgrades.
>
> * MT7988
> * 10G SFP
> * 5G copper
> *
If only 1 SKU, I think it would be better if we only have 2x 10G SFPs
than 10G+5G That's a waste of the hardware.
Best regards,
Shengyu
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwr
On 14.02.25 16:41, Eric via openwrt-devel wrote:
Regarding the multiple SKUs, why not just have two like the One: a completed
device, plug and play; a "kit" without a case, just board and maybe PSU, you
supply everything else including antennas...
it was a good idea but in reality ~6k units wer
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message ---
On Friday, February 14th, 2025 at
Hi,
Maybe we can have a differernt version that switch that rtl phy to a
SFP+ cage? This would bring more flexibility and also higher speed.
5gbps phy would be hot and requires more expensive RJ45 cable. If using
SFP+ cage, we can use LC/SC fiber modules rather than rj45.
Also, since MT7988 has
On 14.02.25 11:01, Rui Salvaterra wrote:
Daniel was concerned about the MediaTek's PPE not
recognising the MaxLinear DSA tags, when I chatted with him, but it
seems there won't be any issues.
the PPE works with the switch using 1q special tags
___
o
Hi,
Will the WIFI hardware have dedicated FEMs? Also, more SFPs would be
better.
Best regards,
Shengyu
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
[Replying to all this time]
Hi, John,
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 at 18:46, John Crispin wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> starting a [VOTE] to get approval allowing me to begin the development
> of OpenWrt "Two".
>
> "Two" will have all of the features that "One" has with the following
> upgrades.
>
> * MT7988
> * 10
Hi!
On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 2:46 AM John Crispin wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> starting a [VOTE] to get approval allowing me to begin the development
> of OpenWrt "Two".
>
> "Two" will have all of the features that "One" has with the following
> upgrades.
>
> * MT7988
> * 10G SFP
> * 5G copper
> * 4 port 2.
On 14.02.25 09:56, David Lang wrote:
I don't see any reason why there can't be a couple different cases
available, one with internal antennas and one with external antennas.
(I've converted APs both ways for my own uses)
two cases means two SKUs, then taking into account that we might need
d
John Crispin wrote:
* Tri-band Wi-Fi 7
Do you expect the design to include casing with internal antennas, or
are you going for the hedgehog look?
Ideally internal but no final conclusion yet, we will use the BE5000
2+3+3 design
I don't see any reason why there can't be a couple different c
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message ---
On 2025-02-12 19:44, John Crispin
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message ---
On 2025-02-13 09:47, John Crispin
I am not sure if I get a vote either, but +1. This is the penultimate
geek router.
I would love it if along the way the antenna design could be analyzed
(better beamforming at distance), and perhaps the rigorous set of
tests that candelatech does applied and published.
On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 1
I also don't get a vote, but this sounds great.
Myself being in the market for some new Wifi 7 capable routers and a
replacement for my aging gateway. Would buy at least 4 of these in a
heartbeat. And I would be willing to wait for them if they are coming.
Personally I think this mix is gre
On 2/12/25 19:44, John Crispin wrote:
Hi,
starting a [VOTE] to get approval allowing me to begin the development
of OpenWrt "Two".
"Two" will have all of the features that "One" has with the following
upgrades.
* MT7988
* 10G SFP
* 5G copper
* 4 port 2.5G copper
* 1-2 port 1G copper
* Tri-
Hi,
On 12.02.2025 19:44, John Crispin wrote:
Hi,
starting a [VOTE] to get approval allowing me to begin the development
of OpenWrt "Two".
"Two" will have all of the features that "One" has with the following
upgrades.
* MT7988
* 10G SFP
* 5G copper
* 4 port 2.5G copper
* 1-2 port 1G copper
*
+1 on giving John Crispin permission to work with another company to produce a
"OpenWrt Two" ( that is, using the "OpenWrt" name)
Other people are considering using this device to do powerful things. What are
the projected RAM/Flash capacities? Thanks
Rich
> On Feb 12, 2025, at 1:44 PM, John C
On 2/12/25 7:44 PM, John Crispin wrote:
starting a [VOTE] to get approval allowing me to begin the development of OpenWrt
"Two".
"Two" will have all of the features that "One" has with the following upgrades.
* MT7988
* 10G SFP
* 5G copper
* 4 port 2.5G copper
* 1-2 port 1G copper
* Tri-band W
On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 5:56 AM John Crispin wrote:
> long story short ... adding a hub and exposing 4 ports would cost 5$+
For a ~$250 device (even assuming a landed cost of around $120 or
so?), is that such a burden? Giving this system the best
expandability bang for the buck would seem to be
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message ---
On 13/02/2025 08:47, John Crispi
On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 04:06:50PM +0100, John Crispin wrote:
>
> On 13.02.25 16:03, p...@oranjevos.nl wrote:
> > Very interesting.
> > Would also a SATA port be feasible ?
>
> the device will support ssd via pcie
I hope that, like on the OpenWrt One, the M.2 slot is going to be on the
top side
On 13.02.25 15:32, Tim Small wrote:
Is that the Realek RTL8251B ? If-so that supports MACsec offload I think
That is the PHY currently being considered.
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mail
On 13.02.25 16:03, p...@oranjevos.nl wrote:
Very interesting.
Would also a SATA port be feasible ?
the device will support ssd via pcie
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/open
Op 12 feb 2025, om 19:44 heeft John Crispin het volgende
geschreven:
> Hi,
>
> starting a [VOTE] to get approval allowing me to begin the development of
> OpenWrt "Two".
>
> "Two" will have all of the features that "One" has with the following
> upgrades.
>
> * MT7988
> * 10G SFP
> * 5G copp
On 13.02.25 12:21, G10h4ck wrote:
Also at least a couple of plain USB port instead of just one would be
very nice improvement
Right now the plan is to have a single USB3 port. If we add multiple
ports we would require an internal HUB and those cost several dollars
plus the additional connect
+1
Is it possible to have a spare miniPCIe connector for an extra radio or
other kind of devices?
Also at least a couple of plain USB port instead of just one would be
very nice improvement
Cheers
Gio
On 2025-02-12 19:44, John Crispin wrote:
Hi,
starting a [VOTE] to get approval allow
On 13.02.25 10:55, Bjørn Mork via openwrt-devel wrote:
Nice. And with lots of docs already public. But no existing driver?
Will Maxlinear (or whoever owns the brand at the moment) upstream a DSA
driver for this chip, or is that going to be part of the OpenWrt effort?
A DSA driver exists but
śr., 12 lut 2025 o 19:46 John Crispin napisał(a):
>
> Hi,
>
> starting a [VOTE] to get approval allowing me to begin the development
> of OpenWrt "Two".
>
> "Two" will have all of the features that "One" has with the following
> upgrades.
>
> * MT7988
> * 10G SFP
> * 5G copper
> * 4 port 2.5G copp
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message ---
John Crispin writes:
> the switc
On 13.02.25 09:17, Bjørn Mork via openwrt-devel wrote:
John Crispin writes:
* 10G SFP
* 5G copper
* 4 port 2.5G copper
* 1-2 port 1G copper
May I ask about the reasoning here? Just curious.
Which switch and phys are being considered?
the switch will be Maxlinear MXL86252
And why 5g inst
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message ---
John Crispin writes:
> * 10G SFP
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 at 19:45, John Crispin wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> starting a [VOTE] to get approval allowing me to begin the development
> of OpenWrt "Two".
>
> "Two" will have all of the features that "One" has with the following
> upgrades.
>
> * MT7988
> * 10G SFP
> * 5G copper
> * 4 port 2.5G copp
Are you expecting a "no" from anyone here? ;)
I'll have one, please!
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 19:44:58 +0100
John Crispin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> starting a [VOTE] to get approval allowing me to begin the
> development of OpenWrt "Two".
>
> "Two" will have all of the features that "One" has with the follo
On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 12:15:11PM -0800, Ben Greear wrote:
> On 2/12/25 10:44 AM, John Crispin wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > starting a [VOTE] to get approval allowing me to begin the development of
> > OpenWrt "Two".
> >
> > "Two" will have all of the features that "One" has with the following
> > u
On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 07:44:58PM +0100, John Crispin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> starting a [VOTE] to get approval allowing me to begin the development of
> OpenWrt "Two".
>
> "Two" will have all of the features that "One" has with the following
> upgrades.
>
> * MT7988
> * 10G SFP
> * 5G copper
> * 4 po
On 2/12/25 10:44 AM, John Crispin wrote:
Hi,
starting a [VOTE] to get approval allowing me to begin the development of OpenWrt
"Two".
"Two" will have all of the features that "One" has with the following upgrades.
* MT7988
* 10G SFP
* 5G copper
* 4 port 2.5G copper
* 1-2 port 1G copper
* Tri-
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message ---
+1
I was hoping for 5G modem supp
+1
The more the merrier
> On 12. Feb 2025, at 18:46, John Crispin wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> starting a [VOTE] to get approval allowing me to begin the development of
> OpenWrt "Two".
>
> "Two" will have all of the features that "One" has with the following
> upgrades.
>
> * MT7988
> * 10G SFP
>
On 12.02.25 19:44, John Crispin wrote:
Hi,
starting a [VOTE] to get approval allowing me to begin the development
of OpenWrt "Two".
"Two" will have all of the features that "One" has with the following
upgrades.
* MT7988
* 10G SFP
* 5G copper
* 4 port 2.5G copper
* 1-2 port 1G copper
* Tri-ban
61 matches
Mail list logo
